Transparency for Trust in Government: How Effective is Formal Transparency?

Many countries refer to transparency not only as the right to access information, but also as a tool for enhancing government efficiency and accountability. However, the practice of transparency is still linked to the need to comply with legal obligations, not necessarily meeting citizens’ needs. The purpose of this article is twofold: it measures the levels of transparency of governments and the needs of citizens for government information and consequently assesses whether there is a gap, offering recommendations for reducing it. This should contribute to reaching higher levels of useful rather than formal transparency and may help in facilitating government-constituent relations.

[1]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  PAYOFFS FROM COMPUTERIZATION - LESSONS OVER TIME , 1990 .

[2]  David Osimo.  Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How? , 2008 .

[3]  Luca Lo Schiavo,et al.  Quality Standards in the Public Sector: Differences Between Italy and the UK in the Citizen’s Charter initiative , 2000 .

[4]  Daniel A. Kaufmann,et al.  Transparenting Transparency: Initial Empirics and Policy Applications , 2005 .

[5]  C. Grönroos.  From Scientific Management to Service Management , 1994 .

[6]  Walter J.M. Kickert,et al.  Public management and administrative reform in Western Europe , 1997 .

[7]  J. Ritchie,et al.  Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers , 2013 .

[8]  Alasdair S. Roberts,et al.  Blacked Out: Government Secrecy in the Information Age , 2006 .

[9]  L. Torres.  Trajectories in public administration reforms in European Continental countries , 2004 .

[10]  Walter J.M. Kickert,et al.  Public Management in the United States and Europe , 2001 .

[11]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .

[12]  David Heald,et al.  Varieties of transparency , 2006 .

[13]  T. Bovaird.  Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services , 2007 .

[14]  Nicholas Walliman,et al.  Social research methods , 2006 .

[15]  Renée A. Irvin,et al.  Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the effort? , 2004 .

[16]  C. King,et al.  The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration , 1998 .

[17]  S. Tefft.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2002 .

[18]  Patrick Birkinshaw,et al.  FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AND OPENNESS: FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS? , 2006 .

[19]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  Participation and Development: Perspectives from the Comprehensive Development Paradigm , 2002 .

[20]  Jooho Lee,et al.  E‐Participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government , 2012 .

[21]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[22]  O. Glassey,et al.  A Proximity Indicator for eGovernment: The Smallest Number of Clicks. , 2005 .

[23]  F. Lega.  Strategies for multi-hospital networks: a framework , 2005, Health services management research.

[24]  Thomas Webler,et al.  “Right” Discourse in Citizen Participation: An Evaluative Yardstick , 1995 .

[25]  Jeffrey Zeldman,et al.  Taking Your Talent to the Web: A Guide for the Transitioning Designer , 2001 .

[26]  C. Hood,et al.  Transparency: the Key to Better Governance? , 2006 .

[27]  Yuping Liu,et al.  What is Interactivity and is it Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness , 2002 .

[28]  J.E.J. Prins.  Designing E-Government : On the Crossroads of Technological Innovation and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[29]  Roumeen Islam,et al.  Do More Transparent Governments Govern Better? , 2003 .

[30]  Robert P. McGowan,et al.  Information systems and public management , 1985 .

[31]  Gregg G. Van Ryzin,et al.  Citizen Attitudes Toward Transparency in Local Government , 2007 .

[32]  Pippa Norris,et al.  Draft chapter for the UN World Public Sector Report Deepening Democracy via E-Governance , 2003 .

[33]  C. Demchak,et al.  Democracy and Bureaucracy in the Age of the Web , 2002 .

[34]  Thomas C. Beierle.  USING SOCIAL GOALS TO EVALUATE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL DECISIONS , 2005 .

[35]  Ivar Kolstad,et al.  Is Transparency the Key to Reducing Corruption in Resource-Rich Countries? , 2009 .

[36]  Subhash Bhatnagar,et al.  Transparency and Corruption: Does E-Government Help? , 2010 .

[37]  Jeannine E. Relly,et al.  Perceptions of transparency of government policymaking: A cross-national study , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[38]  Melvin J. Dubnick,et al.  Issues of Accountability in Flexible Personnel Systems , 1994 .

[39]  Kerry Rodden,et al.  Smartback: supporting users in back navigation , 2004, WWW '04.

[40]  Peter Gyngell,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology , 1994 .

[41]  Helen Margetts.  Transparency and Digital Government , 2006 .

[42]  Valentina Mele,et al.  The Modena e-network for strengthening local governance and citizen participation , 2002 .

[43]  J. Prins.  Electronic Government, Variations on a concept , 2001 .

[44]  A. Meijer.  Understanding modern transparency , 2009 .

[45]  D. Day.  Citizen Participation in the Planning Process: An Essentially Contested Concept? , 1997 .

[46]  O. O’neill,et al.  Transparency and the Ethics of Communication , 2006 .

[47]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Development Informatics Working Paper Series the Tyranny of Participation in Information Systems: Learning from Development Projects the Tyranny of Participation in Information Systems: Learning from Development Projects , 2022 .

[48]  Sonia Royo,et al.  ARE ICTs IMPROVING TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE EU REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS? AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 2007 .

[49]  Maria Cucciniello,et al.  Assessing Transparency in Government: Rhetoric, Reality and Desire , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[50]  John Randolph,et al.  IMPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION-MAKING THROUGH COLLABORATIVE METHODS , 2005 .

[51]  R. Mulgan.  'Accountability': an ever-expanding concept? , 2000 .

[52]  Nancy S. Lind,et al.  Faces and Phases of Transparency Reform in Local Government , 2004 .

[53]  V. Frissen,et al.  Public Services 2.0: The Impact of Social Computing on Public Services , 2010 .

[54]  Vicente Pina,et al.  Are ICTs promoting government accountability?: A comparative analysis of e-governance developments in 19 OECD countries , 2007 .

[55]  Denis Osborne,et al.  Transparency and accountability reconsidered , 2004 .

[56]  J. Enns,et al.  What competition? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  Vicente Pinilla,et al.  Is E-Government Leading to More Accountable and Transparent Local Governments? An Overall View , 2010 .

[58]  D. West.  E‐Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes , 2004 .

[59]  Zoe Radnor,et al.  A New Theory for Public Service Management? Toward a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach , 2013 .

[60]  Linda Deleon,et al.  Accountability In A ‘Reinvented’ Government , 1998 .

[61]  Valentina Ndou,et al.  E – Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges , 2004, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[62]  Jonathan G. S. Koppell.  Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of “Multiple Accountabilities Disorder” , 2005 .

[63]  Tara Vishwanath,et al.  Towards Transparency in Finance and Governance , 1999 .

[64]  Jorge M. Valadez.  Deliberative Democracy, Political Legitimacy, And Self-determination In Multi-cultural Societies , 2000 .