Automated Assessment of Paragraph Quality: Introduction, Body, and Conclusion Paragraphs

Natural language processing and statistical methods were used to identify linguistic features associated with the quality of student-generated paragraphs. Linguistic features were assessed using Coh-Metrix. The resulting computational models demonstrated small to medium effect sizes for predicting paragraph quality: introduction quality r2 = .25, body quality r2 = .10, and conclusion quality r2 = .11. Although the variance explained was somewhat low, the linguistic features identified were consistent with the rhetorical goals of paragraph types. Avenues for bolstering this approach by considering individual writing styles and techniques are considered.

[1]  Lawrence M. Rudner,et al.  An Evaluation of IntelliMetric™ Essay Scoring System , 2006 .

[2]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[3]  Semire Dikli,et al.  An Overview of Automated Scoring of Essays. , 2006 .

[4]  L. Thompson,et al.  Learning to Teach the Five-Paragraph Theme. , 2003 .

[5]  Martin Chodorow,et al.  Automated Essay Evaluation: The Criterion Online Writing Service , 2004, AI Mag..

[6]  Marti A. Hearst The debate on automated essay grading , 2000 .

[7]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Coh-Metrix: Capturing Linguistic Features of Cohesion , 2010 .

[8]  D. McNamara,et al.  Cohesion, coherence, and expert evaluations of writing proficiency , 2010 .

[9]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Classifying paragraph types using linguistic features: Is paragraph positioning important? , 2011 .

[10]  T. Landauer Automatic Essay Assessment , 2003 .

[11]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[12]  S. Graham,et al.  A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. , 2007 .

[13]  Doris V. Gunderson Research in the Teaching of English , 1971, English Journal.

[14]  Lawrence M. Rudner,et al.  An Evaluation of the IntelliMetric[SM] Essay Scoring System. , 2006 .

[15]  Saul Geiser,et al.  UC and the SAT: Predictive Validity and Differential Impact of the SAT I and SAT II at the University of California , 2001 .

[16]  Bonnie Albertson,et al.  Organization and Development Features of Grade 8 and Grade 10 Writers: A Descriptive Study of Delaware Student Testing Program (DSTP) Essays. , 2007 .

[17]  R. T. Kellogg,et al.  Improving the writing skills of college students , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Philip M. McCarthy,et al.  Linguistic Features of Writing Quality , 2010 .

[19]  Organization and Development , 1972 .

[20]  Muddying Boundaries: Mixing Genres with Five Paragraphs. , 2000 .