Spinal loading when lifting from industrial storage bins

The study documented three-dimensional spinal loading during lifting from an industrial bin. Two lifting styles and two bin design factors were examined in Phase I. The lifting style measures in Phase I were one hand versus two hand and standing on one foot versus two feet. The bin design variables were region of load in the bin and bin height. The Phase II study examined one-handed lifting styles with and without supporting body weight with the free hand on the bin as well as region and the number of feet. Twelve male and 12 female subjects lifted an 11.3 kg box from the bin. Spinal compression, lateral shear and anterior - posterior shear forces were estimated using a validated EMG-assisted biomechanical model. Phase I results indicated that the bin design factor of region had the greatest impact on spinal loading. The upper front region minimized spinal loading for all lifting styles. Furthermore, the lifting style of two hands and two feet minimized spinal loading. However, comparing Phase I two-handed lifting with Phase II one-handed supported lifting, the one-handed supported lifting techniques had lower compressive and anterior - posterior shear loads in the lower regions as well as the upper back region of the bin. A bin design that facilitates lifting from the upper front region of the bin reduces spinal loading more effectively than specific lifting styles. Furthermore, a bin design with a hand hold may facilitate workers using a supported lifting style that reduces spinal loading.

[1]  Avis,et al.  EŒects of box features on spine loading during warehouse order selecting , 2001 .

[2]  Alwin Luttmann,et al.  Lumbar load during one-handed bricklaying , 1991 .

[3]  N. Özkaya,et al.  Fundamentals of Biomechanics: Equilibrium, Motion, and Deformation , 1991 .

[4]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[5]  W. Marras,et al.  A Biomechanical Assessment and Model of Axial Twisting in the Thoracolumbar Spine , 1995, Spine.

[6]  T. Waters,et al.  Evaluation of spinal loading during lowering and lifting. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  K P Granata,et al.  Female and male trunk geometry: size and prediction of the spine loading trunk muscles derived from MRI. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  William S. Marras,et al.  Industrial electromyography (EMG) , 1990 .

[9]  Gary A. Mirka,et al.  Accuracy of a three-dimensional lumbar motion monitor for recording dynamic trunk motion characteristics , 1992 .

[10]  T. M. Cook,et al.  Dynamic comparison of the two-hand stoop and assisted one-hand lift methods , 1990 .

[11]  A Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[12]  W. Marras,et al.  An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  W S Marras,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Motion Model of Loads on the Lumbar Spine: I. Model Structure , 1991, Human factors.

[14]  M. Pope,et al.  The relationship between trunk muscle electromyography and lifting moments in the sagittal and frontal planes. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  W. G. Allread,et al.  Spine loading and probability of low back disorder risk as a function of box location on a pallet , 1997 .

[16]  W S Marras,et al.  Networks of internal trunk-loading activities under controlled trunk-motion conditions. , 1988, Spine.

[17]  W S Marras,et al.  A stochastic model of trunk muscle coactivation during trunk bending. , 1993, Spine.

[18]  K P Granata,et al.  Effects of box features on spine loading during warehouse order selecting. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[20]  K P Granata,et al.  A method for measuring external spinal loads during unconstrained free-dynamic lifting. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  W. Marras,et al.  Spine loading during trunk lateral bending motions. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  K P Granata,et al.  MRI-derived moment-arms of the female and male spine loading muscles. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[23]  W. Marras,et al.  The Influence of Trunk Muscle Coactivity on Dynamic Spinal Loads , 1995, Spine.

[24]  W S Marras,et al.  Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[25]  W. Marras,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Motion Model of Loads on the Lumbar Spine: II. Model Validation , 1991, Human factors.

[26]  W. Marras,et al.  An EMG-assisted model of loads on the lumbar spine during asymmetric trunk extensions. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  W S Marras,et al.  Simulift: A Simulation Model of Human Trunk Motion , 1989, Spine.