Maximum Likelihood Approach to the Estimation and Discrimination of Exoatmospheric Active Phantom Tracks using Motion Features

An optimal kinematics-based discrimination algorithm is presented for the nearly real-time discrimination of exoatmospheric active phantom (deception) tracks against other physical targets (PTs). The new approach uses a batch-processing maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) to precisely estimate the deception range of decoys from raw radar tracking measurements by using motion features. Hence once these parameters are estimated, they can serve as direct statistics to initiate a discrimination. By augmenting the state vector with deception parameters, explicit expressions of motion models of decoys in the radar centered East-North-Up (ENU) coordinate system (CS) and spherical-CS are derived. Based on these models, the theoretical Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) and the observability of the deception parameters are also analyzed. A Levenberg-Marquardt method is employed to obtain more robust estimate of these parameters, and the estimated parameters combined with the CRLB are used for designing discrimination algorithm. The simulations verify the feasibility of the algorithm. Furthermore, the discrimination performance due to the influence of radar position, data rate, and radar measurement error are also covered. The advantage of the algorithm lies in that it can position the warhead precisely as well as discriminating active decoys simultaneously when compared with the traditional 6-dimensional orbit determination methods.

[1]  Thomas H. Kerr,et al.  Streamlining measurement iteration for EKF target tracking , 1991 .

[2]  F. Regan,et al.  Dynamics of atmospheric re-entry , 1993 .

[3]  P. Minvielle Tracking a ballistic re-entry vehicle with a sequential Monte-Carlo filter , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[4]  A. Farina,et al.  Tracking a ballistic target: comparison of several nonlinear filters , 2002 .

[5]  Thia Kirubarajan,et al.  Probabilistic data association techniques for target tracking in clutter , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[6]  J. E. Glynn,et al.  Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[7]  Sherman Frankel Defeating theater missile defense radars with active decoys , 1997 .

[8]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[9]  Thia Kirubarajan,et al.  Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation: Theory, Algorithms and Software , 2001 .

[10]  W. Farrell,et al.  Interacting multiple model filter for tactical ballistic missile tracking , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[11]  X. R. Li,et al.  Survey of maneuvering target tracking: II. Ballistic target models , 2001 .

[12]  D. D. Mueller,et al.  Fundamentals of Astrodynamics , 1971 .

[13]  Philip D. West,et al.  Tracking in the presence of range deception ECM and clutter by decomposition and fusion , 1999, Optics & Photonics.

[14]  D. Curtis Schleher,et al.  Electronic Warfare in the Information Age , 1999 .

[15]  Yaakov Bar-Shalom,et al.  Multitarget-Multisensor Tracking: Applications and Advances , 1992 .

[16]  William Z. Lemnios,et al.  Radars for Ballistic Missile Defense Research , 2001 .

[17]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd Edition , 2007 .

[18]  Steve Fetter,et al.  Countermeasures: A Technical Evaluation of the Operational Effectiveness of the Planned US National Missile Defense System , 2000 .

[19]  G.M. Siouris,et al.  Tracking an incoming ballistic missile using an extended interval Kalman filter , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[20]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[21]  P. Minvielle,et al.  Decades of improvements in re-entry ballistic vehicle tracking , 2005, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[22]  X. Rong Li,et al.  A Survey of Maneuvering Target Tracking — Part II : Ballistic Target Models , 2001 .

[23]  S. Buzzi,et al.  Track-before-detect procedures in a multi-target environment , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[24]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[25]  LI X.RONG,et al.  Survey of Maneuvering Target Tracking. Part II: Motion Models of Ballistic and Space Targets , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[26]  C. Chang,et al.  Ballistic trajectory estimation with angle-only measurements , 1979, 1979 18th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[27]  A. Farina,et al.  Tracking of a Ballistic Missile with A-Priori Information , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[28]  A. V. Mrstik,et al.  A track filter for reentry objects with uncertain drag , 1999 .

[29]  G. A. Watson,et al.  IMMPDAF for radar management and tracking benchmark with ECM , 1998 .

[30]  M.G.S. Bruno,et al.  Improved sequential Monte Carlo filtering for ballistic target tracking , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[31]  Yaakov Bar-Shalom,et al.  Ballistic missile track initiation from satellite observations , 1994, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[32]  Wang Xue-song,et al.  Conservation-law based discrimination method of exoatmosphere range false targets , 2009 .

[33]  Samuel S. Blackman,et al.  Multiple-Target Tracking with Radar Applications , 1986 .

[34]  Edward J. Chrzanowski Active Radar Electronic Countermeasures , 1990 .