The Slowdown in First-Response Times of Economics Journals: Can it Be Beneficial?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Ching-chong Lai,et al. Is It Worthwhile to Pay Referees , 2001 .
[2] Gary W. Yohe,et al. Current Publication Lags in Economics Journals , 1980 .
[3] Pravin K. Trivedi. An Analysis of Publication Lags in Econometrics , 1993 .
[4] M. McCabe. Journal Pricing and Mergers: A Portfolio Approach , 2002 .
[5] R. Pieters,et al. Working Paper , 1994 .
[6] R. Tollison,et al. Quality Control in Economics , 2002 .
[7] R. Blank. The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review , 1991 .
[8] Raymond D. Sauer,et al. Estimates of the Returns to Quality and Coauthorship in Economic Academia , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.
[9] W. J. Moore,et al. Reputational Capital and Academic Pay , 2001 .
[10] Ofer H. Azar. Evolution of Social Norms with Heterogeneous Preferences: A General Model and an Application to the Academic Review Process , 2008 .
[11] Joshua S. Gans,et al. Why Referees Are Not Paid (Enough) , 1998 .
[12] G. Price,et al. Current Version : February 26 , 2003 THE RETURNS TO SENIORITY IN THE LABOR MARKET FOR ACADEMIC ECONOMISTS , 2003 .
[13] Paul R. Milgrom,et al. Monotone Comparative Statics , 1994 .
[14] T. Bergstrom. Free Labor for Costly Journals , 2001 .
[15] D. Laband. Is There Value-Added from the Review Process in Economics?: Preliminary Evidence from Authors , 1990 .
[16] Ofer H. Azar. Rejections and the Importance of First Response Times , 2003 .
[17] Glenn Ellison. Evolving Standards for Academic Publishing: A q‐r Theory , 2002, Journal of Political Economy.