Micro- and nanostructure of the adhesive material secreted by the tube feet of the sea star Asterias rubens.

To attach to underwater surfaces, sea stars rely on adhesive secretions produced by specialised organs, the tube feet. Adhesion is temporary and tube feet can also voluntarily become detached. The adhesive material is produced by two types of adhesive secretory cells located in the epidermis of the tube foot disc, and is deposited between the disc surface and the substratum. After detachment, this material remains on the substratum as a footprint. Using LM, SEM, and AFM, we described the fine structure of footprints deposited on various substrata by individuals of Asterias rubens. Ultrastructure of the adhesive layer of attached tube feet was also investigated using TEM. Whatever the method used, the adhesive material appeared as made up of globular nanostructures forming a meshwork deposited on a thin homogeneous film. This appearance did not differ according to whether the footprints were fixed or not, and whether they were observed hydrated or dry. TEM observations suggest that type 2 adhesive cells would be responsible for the release of the material constituting the homogeneous film whereas type 1 adhesive cells would produce the material forming the meshwork. This reticulated pattern would originate from the arrangement of the adhesive cell secretory pores on the disc surface.

[1]  P. Gatenholm,et al.  The barnacle adhesive plaque: morphological and chemical differences as a response to substrate properties , 2003 .

[2]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Sticky Feet: From Animals to Materials , 2007 .

[3]  edited by Lidia Scalera-Liaci Calogero Canicatti.  Echinoderm Research 1991 , 1992 .

[4]  J. Waite.  Mussel glue fromMytilus californianus Conrad: a comparative study , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology B.

[5]  Kei Kamino,et al.  Underwater Adhesive of Marine Organisms as the Vital Link Between Biological Science and Material Science , 2008, Marine Biotechnology.

[6]  M. Jangoux,et al.  The Role of Podial Secretions in Adhesion in Two Species of Sea Stars (Echinodermata). , 1994, The Biological bulletin.

[7]  SenLi Guo,et al.  Surface elastic modulus of barnacle adhesive and release characteristics from silicone surfaces , 2004, Biofouling.

[8]  Russell J Stewart,et al.  Multiscale structure of the underwater adhesive of Phragmatopoma californica: a nanostructured latex with a steep microporosity gradient. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[9]  P. Mulvaney,et al.  THE STRUCTURE AND NANOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE ADHESIVE MUCILAGE THAT MEDIATES DIATOM‐SUBSTRATUM ADHESION AND MOTILITY 1 , 2003 .

[10]  B. Watermann,et al.  Peculiarities of barnacle adhesive cured on non-stick surfaces , 2003 .

[11]  P. Mulvaney,et al.  Characterization of the adhesive mucilages secreted by live diatom cells using atomic force microscopy. , 2002, Protist.

[12]  R. Stewart,et al.  The tube cement of Phragmatopoma californica: a solid foam , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[13]  J. Werkmeister,et al.  Characterization of a protein-based adhesive elastomer secreted by the Australian frog Notaden bennetti. , 2005, Biomacromolecules.

[14]  Kellar Autumn,et al.  Properties, Principles, and Parameters of the Gecko Adhesive System , 2006 .

[15]  T. Nishino,et al.  Identification and functional characterization of a novel barnacle cement protein , 2007, The FEBS journal.

[16]  M. Stanley,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies to adhesive cell coat glycoproteins secreted by zoospores of the green alga Enteromorpha , 1999, Planta.

[17]  A. Chiovitti,et al.  Diatom Adhesives: Molecular and Mechanical Properties , 2006 .

[18]  P. Mulvaney,et al.  The application of atomic force microscopy to topographical studies and force measurements on the secreted adhesive of the green alga Enteromorpha , 2000, Planta.

[19]  Maureen E. Callow,et al.  Use of environmental scanning electron microscopy to image the spore adhesive of the marine alga Enteromorpha in its natural hydrated state , 2003 .

[20]  D. Haesaerts,et al.  Echinoderm adhesive secretions: from experimental characterization to biotechnological applications. , 2005, Progress in molecular and subcellular biology.

[21]  P. Mulvaney,et al.  The topography of soft, adhesive diatom ‘trails’ as observed by Atomic Force Microscopy , 2000 .

[22]  L. A. Thomas,et al.  ADHESIVE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE TUBE FEET OF A STARFISH, LEPTASTERIAS HEXACTIS, AND SUBSTRATA , 1985 .

[23]  G. Vancso,et al.  Towards a nanomechanical basis for temporary adhesion in barnacle cyprids (Semibalanus balanoides) , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[24]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Adhesion mechanisms of the mussel foot proteins mfp-1 and mfp-3. , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  F. Roberto,et al.  Understanding Marine Mussel Adhesion , 2007, Marine Biotechnology.

[26]  S. Gorb,et al.  From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  B. Cribb,et al.  Preliminary characterisation and extraction of anterior adhesive secretion in monogenean (platyhelminth) parasites. , 2002, Folia parasitologica.

[28]  Cyprien Gay,et al.  Stickiness—Some Fundamentals of Adhesion1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[29]  M. Naldrett,et al.  The importance of sulphur cross-links and hydrophobic interactions in the polymerization of barnacle cement , 1993, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[30]  J. Herbert Waite,et al.  Mussel Adhesion: Finding the Tricks Worth Mimicking , 2005 .

[31]  P. Dubois,et al.  Ultrastructure of the echinoderm cuticle after fast‐freezing / freeze substitution and conventional chemical fixations , 2000, Microscopy research and technique.

[32]  Delphine Gourdon,et al.  Adhesion mechanisms of the mussel foot proteins mfp-1 and mfp-3 , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  J. Waite,et al.  Polyphosphoprotein from the adhesive pads of Mytilus edulis. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[34]  B. Cribb,et al.  Simultaneous fixation using glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide or potassium ferricyanide‐reduced osmium for the preservation of monogenean flatworms: An assessment for Merizocotyle icopae , 2004, Microscopy research and technique.

[35]  Alexandre,et al.  A study of the temporary adhesion of the podia in the sea star asterias rubens (Echinodermata, asteroidea) through their footprints , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.