Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer.

CONTEXT Although prostate cancer (PCa) screening reduces the incidence of advanced disease and mortality, trade-offs include overdiagnosis and resultant overtreatment. OBJECTIVE To review primary data on PCa overdiagnosis and overtreatment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Electronic searches were conducted in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Embase from inception to July 2013 for original articles on PCa overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Supplemental articles were identified through hand searches. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The lead-time and excess-incidence approaches are the main ways used to estimate overdiagnosis in epidemiological studies, with estimates varying widely. The estimated number of PCa cases needed to be diagnosed to save a life has ranged from 48 down to 5 with increasing follow-up. In clinical studies, generally lower rates of overdiagnosis have been reported based on the frequency of low-grade minimal tumors at radical prostatectomy (1.7-46.8%). Autopsy studies have reported PCa in 18.5-38.5%, although not all are low grade or low volume. Factors influencing overdiagnosis include the study population, screening protocol, and background incidence, limiting generalizability between settings. Reported rates of overtreatment vary widely in the literature, although contemporary international studies suggest increasing use of conservative management. CONCLUSIONS Epidemiological, clinical, and autopsy studies have been used to examine PCa overdiagnosis, with estimates ranging widely from 1.7% to 67%. Correspondingly, estimates of overtreatment vary widely based on patient features and may be declining internationally. Careful patient selection for screening and reducing overtreatment are important to preserve the benefits and reduce the downstream harms of prostate-specific antigen testing. Because all of these estimates are extremely population and context specific, this must be considered when using these data to inform policy. PATIENT SUMMARY Screening reduces spread and death from prostate cancer (PCa) but overdiagnoses some low-risk tumors that may not have caused harm. Because treatment has potential side effects, it is critical that not all patients with PCa receive aggressive treatment.

[1]  D. Grignon,et al.  High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and prostatic adenocarcinoma between the ages of 20-69: an autopsy study of 249 cases. , 1994, In vivo.

[2]  M. Zelen,et al.  Overdiagnosis in early detection programs. , 2004, Biostatistics.

[3]  T. Tammela,et al.  Results of the three rounds of the Finnish Prostate Cancer Screening Trial—The incidence of advanced cancer is decreased by screening , 2010, International journal of cancer.

[4]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  The changing face of low-risk prostate cancer: trends in clinical presentation and primary management. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Quality-of-life effects of prostate-specific antigen screening. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  H. Welch,et al.  Overdiagnosis in cancer. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  S. Greenfield,et al.  Overtreatment of men with low‐risk prostate cancer and significant comorbidity , 2011, Cancer.

[8]  T. Tammela,et al.  Prostate cancer mortality in the Finnish randomized screening trial. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  P. Peele,et al.  Cost comparison between watchful waiting with active surveillance and active treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2010, Urology.

[10]  A. Haese*,et al.  Critical assessment of tools to predict clinically insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy in contemporary men , 2008, Cancer.

[11]  Ruth Etzioni,et al.  Long-term projections of the harm-benefit trade-off in prostate cancer screening are more favorable than previous short-term estimates. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  G. Draisma,et al.  A note on the catch-up time method for estimating lead or sojourn time in prostate cancer screening , 2013, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  E. Gillanders,et al.  Genome‐wide screen for prostate cancer susceptibility genes in men with clinically significant disease , 2005, The Prostate.

[14]  E. Metter,et al.  What is the true number needed to screen and treat to save a life with prostate-specific antigen testing? , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  Prevalence of prostate cancer on autopsy: cross-sectional study on unscreened Caucasian and Asian men. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  A. Costello,et al.  Patterns of care for men diagnosed with prostate cancer in Victoria from 2008 to 2011 , 2013, The Medical journal of Australia.

[17]  Barnett S Kramer,et al.  Prostate biopsy following a positive screen in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[18]  John T. Wei,et al.  Incidence of initial local therapy among men with lower-risk prostate cancer in the United States. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Comorbidity and mortality results from a randomized prostate cancer screening trial. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  Erik Holmberg,et al.  Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[21]  Manuel Sánchez-Chapado,et al.  Prevalence of prostate cancer and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in Caucasian Mediterranean males: An autopsy study , 2003, The Prostate.

[22]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Treatment of local–regional prostate cancer detected by PSA screening: benefits and harms according to prognostic factors , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[23]  John W. Davis,et al.  Retracted: Many young men with prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) screen‐detected prostate cancers may be candidates for active surveillance , 2013, BJU international.

[24]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Under diagnosis and over diagnosis of prostate cancer in a screening population with serum PSA 2 to 10 ng/ml. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[25]  Peter C Albertsen,et al.  Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment after the introduction of prostate-specific antigen screening: 1986-2005. , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[26]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  2131 DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE BIOPSY-BASED GENOMIC PROSTATE SCORE (GPS) AS A PREDICTOR OF HIGH GRADE OR EXTRACAPSULAR PROSTATE CANCER TO IMPROVE PATIENT SELECTION FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE , 2013 .

[27]  J A Hanley,et al.  Screening for prostate cancer: estimating the magnitude of overdetection. , 1998, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[28]  Adam S. Kibel,et al.  Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European Study , 2009 .

[29]  B. G. Blijenberg,et al.  Screening for prostate cancer: results of the Rotterdam section of the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. , 2013, European urology.

[30]  Ruth Etzioni,et al.  Influence of Study Features and Methods on Overdiagnosis Estimates in Breast and Prostate Cancer Screening , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[31]  E. Metter,et al.  Prostate‐specific antigen velocity (PSAV) risk count improves the specificity of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer , 2012, BJU international.

[32]  I. Davis,et al.  Are we over-diagnosing and over-treating prostate cancer? , 2013 .

[33]  S. Rosso,et al.  Changes in incidence, survival and mortality of prostate cancer in Europe and the United States in the PSA era: additional diagnoses and avoided deaths. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[34]  B. Jeong,et al.  Detection rate of clinically insignificant prostate cancer increases with repeat prostate biopsies. , 2013, Asian journal of andrology.

[35]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Lead-time in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[36]  A. Dicker,et al.  Patterns of Care for Elderly Men Diagnosed With Favorable-risk Prostate Cancer From 2004 to 2008: A Population-based Analysis , 2013, American journal of clinical oncology.

[37]  B. Dezső,et al.  The prevalence of prostate carcinoma and its precursor in Hungary: an autopsy study. , 2005, European urology.

[38]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  Prostate Cancer Mortality following Active Surveillance versus Immediate Radical Prostatectomy , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[39]  T. Tammela,et al.  Lead-time in prostate cancer screening (Finland) , 2002, Cancer Causes & Control.

[40]  Nicolas Barry Delongchamps,et al.  Needle biopsies on autopsy prostates: sensitivity of cancer detection based on true prevalence. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[41]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Over‐diagnosis and under‐diagnosis of screen‐ vs non‐screen‐detected prostate cancers with in men with prostate‐specific antigen levels of 2.0–10.0 ng/mL , 2008, BJU international.

[42]  L. Irwig,et al.  Effects of study methods and biases on estimates of invasive breast cancer overdetection with mammography screening: a systematic review. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.

[43]  A. Tubaro Stage migration in clinically localized prostate cancer , 2001 .

[44]  S. Duffy,et al.  Mean sojourn time, overdiagnosis, and reduction in advanced stage prostate cancer due to screening with PSA: implications of sojourn time on screening , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[45]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  Cancer detection and cancer characteristics in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)--Section Rotterdam. A comparison of two rounds of screening. , 2007, European urology.

[46]  A. Vickers,et al.  Empirical Estimates of the Lead Time Distribution for Prostate Cancer Based on Two Independent Representative Cohorts of Men Not Subject to Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening , 2010, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[47]  Ruth Etzioni,et al.  Estimating Lead Time and Overdiagnosis Associated with PSA Screening from Prostate Cancer Incidence Trends , 2008, Biometrics.

[48]  Angela Mariotto,et al.  Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context. , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[49]  K. Stamatiou,et al.  Frequency of impalpable prostate adenocarcinoma and precancerous conditions in Greek male population: an autopsy study , 2006, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[50]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[51]  H. Ahmed,et al.  Multi-Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Rule-In and Rule-Out Clinically Important Prostate Cancer in Men at Risk: A Cohort Study , 2011, Urologia Internationalis.

[52]  T. Wilt,et al.  There is more to life than death. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[53]  R. DiPaola,et al.  Risk profiles and treatment patterns among men diagnosed as having prostate cancer and a prostate-specific antigen level below 4.0 ng/ml. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.

[54]  E. Feuer,et al.  Reconstructing PSA testing patterns between black and white men in the US from Medicare claims and the National Health Interview Survey , 2007, Cancer.

[55]  Hartwig Huland,et al.  Counseling men with prostate cancer: a nomogram for predicting the presence of small, moderately differentiated, confined tumors. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[56]  T. Guzzo,et al.  Repeat prostate biopsy and the incremental risk of clinically insignificant prostate cancer. , 2010, Urology.

[57]  P. Stattin,et al.  Population based study of use and determinants of active surveillance and watchful waiting for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[58]  William J Catalona,et al.  Under diagnosis and over diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[59]  David C. Miller,et al.  Prostate cancer severity among low income, uninsured men. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[60]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Interpreting Overdiagnosis Estimates in Population-based Mammography Screening , 2011, Epidemiologic reviews.

[61]  P. Carroll,et al.  Sociodemographic predictors of prostate cancer risk category at diagnosis: unique patterns of significant and insignificant disease. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[62]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Clinical and pathological features of screen vs non‐screen‐detected prostate cancers: is there a difference? , 2008, BJU international.

[63]  Eugenio Paci,et al.  Overdiagnosis in Mammographic Screening for Breast Cancer in Europe: A Literature Review , 2012, Journal of medical screening.

[64]  Ruth Etzioni,et al.  Comparative Effectiveness of Alternative Prostate-Specific Antigen–Based Prostate Cancer Screening Strategies , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[65]  W. Shih,et al.  The impact of PSA testing frequency on prostate cancer incidence and treatment in older men , 2011, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[66]  A. Cesinaro,et al.  Immediate radical prostatectomy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation. Over treatment? , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[67]  P. Boyle,et al.  Critical role of prostate biopsy mortality in the number of years of life gained and lost within a prostate cancer screening programme , 2012, BJU international.

[68]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[69]  B. G. Blijenberg,et al.  Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.