Representing part–whole relations in conceptual spaces

[1]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Multidimensional Models of Perception and Cognition , 2014 .

[2]  Sandro Rama Fiorini,et al.  An approach for grounding ontologies in raw data using foundational ontology , 2013, Inf. Syst..

[3]  Virginio Cantoni,et al.  Human and Machine Perception 2 , 2012, Springer US.

[4]  Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al.  Effects of part-based similarity on visual search: The Frankenbear experiment , 2012, Vision Research.

[5]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Parts and Relations in Young Children's Shape-Based Object Recognition , 2011, Journal of cognition and development : official journal of the Cognitive Development Society.

[6]  Rachel Wu,et al.  Attention to Multiple Cues During Spontaneous Object Labeling. , 2011, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[7]  G. Alvarez.  Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Leonidas A. A. Doumas,et al.  A Computational Account of the Development of the Generalization of Shape Information , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  Benjamin Adams,et al.  Conceptual Space Markup Language (CSML): Towards the Cognitive Semantic Web , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing.

[10]  J. Förster.  Relations between perceptual and conceptual scope: how global versus local processing fits a focus on similarity versus dissimilarity. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  M. Tarr,et al.  Visual object recognition: do we know more now than we did 20 years ago? , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[12]  Gerhard Jäger,et al.  The evolution of convex categories , 2007 .

[13]  P. Simons,et al.  Real wholes, real parts : Mereology without algebra , 2006 .

[14]  Markus Graf,et al.  Coordinate transformations in object recognition. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Independent representation of parts and the relations between them: evidence from integrative agnosia. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  C. Mash,et al.  Multidimensional shape similarity in the development of visual object classification. , 2006, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[17]  Ingvar Johansson,et al.  Formal mereology and ordinary language - Reply to Varzi , 2006, Appl. Ontology.

[18]  Achille C. Varzi.  A note on the transitivity of parthood , 2006, Appl. Ontology.

[19]  Giancarlo Guizzardi,et al.  Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models , 2005 .

[20]  Ali Shokoufandeh,et al.  Indexing hierarchical structures using graph spectra , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[21]  Shimon Edelman,et al.  The interaction of shape- and location-based priming in object categorisation: Evidence for a hybrid “what+where” representation stage , 2005, Vision Research.

[22]  Jean-François Condotta,et al.  On the Relevance of Conceptual Spaces for Spatial and Temporal Reasoning , 2005, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[23]  D. Foster,et al.  Recognizing novel three–dimensional objects by summing signals from parts and views , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Janet Aisbett,et al.  A general formulation of conceptual spaces as a meso level representation , 2001, Artif. Intell..

[25]  Salvatore Gaglio,et al.  Conceptual Spaces for Computer Vision Representations , 2001, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[26]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A Structural Account of Global and Local Processing , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Salience of visual parts , 1997, Cognition.

[28]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Modeling Parts and Wholes , 1996, Data Knowl. Eng..

[29]  Friederike Moltmann,et al.  A New Notion of Part Structure for Natural Language , 1996, Data Knowl. Eng..

[30]  S. Ullman.  High-Level Vision: Object Recognition and Visual Cognition , 1996 .

[31]  S Edelman,et al.  Representation is representation of similarities , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[32]  Simone Pribbenow,et al.  Midwinters, end games, and body parts: a classification of part-whole relations , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[33]  Alan L. Yuille,et al.  FORMS: A flexible object recognition and modelling system , 1995, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[34]  Robert L. Goldstone.  The role of similarity in categorization: providing a groundwork , 1994, Cognition.

[35]  M. Farah.  Is an Object an Object an Object? Cognitive and Neuropsychological Investigations of Domain Specificity in Visual Object Recognition , 1992 .

[36]  I. Biederman,et al.  Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.

[37]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Parts, Partonomies, and Taxonomies. , 1989 .

[38]  Douglas Herrmann,et al.  A Taxonomy of Part-Whole Relations , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[40]  I. Biederman.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[41]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Perceptual Organization and the Representation of Natural Form , 1986, Artif. Intell..

[42]  B. Tversky,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : General VOL . 113 , No . 2 JUNE 1984 Objects , Parts , and Categories , 2005 .

[43]  R. Weale.  Vision. A Computational Investigation Into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. David Marr , 1983 .

[44]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[45]  A. Tversky.  Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[46]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[47]  W. R. Garner.  The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[48]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Using Conceptual Spaces to Model the Dynamics of Empirical Theories , 2011, Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science.

[49]  Erik J Olsson,et al.  Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science , 2011, Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science.

[50]  Angela Schwering,et al.  Conceptual Spaces - The Geometry of Thought , 2008, Künstliche Intell..

[51]  Marc T. Tomlinson,et al.  Learning Abstract Relations Through Analogy to Concrete Exemplars , 2006 .

[52]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  How to make the Semantic Web more semantic , 2004 .

[53]  S. Laurence,et al.  Concepts: Core Readings , 1999 .

[54]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  ' s personal copy Simplicity and generalization : Short-cutting abstraction in children ’ s object categorizations , 1997 .

[55]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Symbolic, Conceptual and Subconceptual Representations , 1997 .

[56]  Robert D. Melara,et al.  The concept of perceptual similarity : from psychophysics to cognitive psychology , 1992 .

[57]  Daniel Algom,et al.  Psychophysical approaches to cognition. , 1992 .

[58]  W. Todd Maddox,et al.  Perceptual and decisional separability. , 1992 .

[59]  Richard G. Kurial,et al.  Representation and recognition , 1990 .

[60]  R. Chaffin,et al.  An empirical taxonomy of part-whole relations: Effects of part-whole relation type on relation identification , 1988 .

[61]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[62]  N. Foo.  Conceptual Spaces—The Geometry of Thought , 2022 .