Group size affects social relationships in yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris)

Demographic variation, such as changes in population size, affects group-living conditions and thus creates new opportunities for individuals to interact socially. To understand how this variation in the social environment affects social structure, we used social network analysis to explore affiliative behaviors of nonpup (i.e., 1 year or older), female, yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris). We examined 4 social attributes (outdegree, indegree, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality) to measure social plasticity in response to group size variation. We found that, in response to increases in group size, individuals established fewer social connections than possible, which suggests that marmots experience constraints on sociality. Similarly, closeness and betweenness centrality decreased as group size increased, suggesting that females are expected to lose influence over other members of the group as group size increases, and there are substantial constraints on marmots transmitting information to others in large groups. Our results also suggest that group-level responses, such as behavioral plasticity, can be explained by individual-level mechanisms that evaluate the costs and benefits of sociality. Interestingly, the mechanistic basis of these group-level responses may, at times, follow patterns expected by chance. We propose that further research is necessary to uncover the mechanisms underlying the individual-level behavioral response. Like group size effects studied in other domains, formally considering group size effects on social structure may shed novel light on the constraints on sociality.

[1]  J. Krause,et al.  Exploring Animal Social Networks , 2008 .

[2]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Rodent sociality and parasite diversity , 2007, Biology Letters.

[3]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[4]  M. Newman,et al.  Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[6]  A. D. Bradshaw,et al.  Evolutionary Significance of Phenotypic Plasticity in Plants , 1965 .

[7]  D. Blumstein Yellow-bellied marmots: insights from an emergent view of sociality , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  D. Lusseau,et al.  Animal social networks: an introduction , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  Martin Rosvall,et al.  Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Massimo Pigliucci,et al.  Phenotypic Plasticity: Beyond Nature and Nurture , 2001 .

[11]  R. G. Butler Population size, social behaviour, and dispersal in house mice: A quantitative investigation , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  R. A. Hinde,et al.  Interactions, Relationships and Social Structure , 1976 .

[13]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[14]  Tina W. Wey,et al.  Patterns of parasite prevalence and individual infection in yellow‐bellied marmots , 2013 .

[15]  Daniel T. Blumstein,et al.  Social attributes and associated performance measures in marmots: bigger male bullies and weakly affiliating females have higher annual reproductive success , 2012, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  D. Koons,et al.  Is life-history buffering or lability adaptive in stochastic environments? , 2009 .

[17]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Applying the coalitionary-traits metric: sociality without cooperation in male yellow-bellied marmots , 2010 .

[18]  A. Magurran,et al.  Schooling preferences for familiar fish vary with group size in a wild guppy population , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  J. Silk Social Components of Fitness in Primate Groups , 2007, Science.

[20]  R. R. Krausz Living in Groups , 2013 .

[21]  D.,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR , 2002 .

[22]  Daniel T. Blumstein,et al.  Time allocation and the evolution of group size , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  S. Stearns The Evolutionary Significance of Phenotypic PlasticityPhenotypic sources of variation among organisms can be described by developmental switches and reaction norms , 1989 .

[24]  Environmentally induced phenotypic variation in wild yellow-bellied marmots , 2015 .

[25]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[26]  M. West-Eberhard Phenotypic Plasticity and the Origins of Diversity , 1989 .

[27]  M. A. Noordwijk,et al.  The effects of dominance rank and group size on female lifetime reproductive success in wild long-tailed macaques,Macaca fascicularis , 2007, Primates.

[28]  Daniel T. Blumstein,et al.  Social cohesion in yellow-bellied marmots is established through age and kin structuring , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  Steven J. Schwager,et al.  A comparison of association indices , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  Tina W. Wey,et al.  Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  J. B. Calhoun The social aspects of population dynamics. , 1952 .

[32]  Jonathan R. Potts,et al.  Animal Interactions and the Emergence of Territoriality , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[33]  Jens Krause,et al.  The evolutionary and ecological consequences of animal social networks: emerging issues. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Group size, grooming and social cohesion in primates , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  João Ricardo Sato,et al.  Discriminating Different Classes of Biological Networks by Analyzing the Graphs Spectra Distribution , 2012, PloS one.

[36]  Martin Rosvall,et al.  Maps of Information Flow Reveal Community Structure In Complex Networks , 2007 .

[37]  J. Silk,et al.  The benefits of social capital: close social bonds among female baboons enhance offspring survival , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  Bourke Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects , 1999 .

[39]  Daniel T Blumstein,et al.  A test of the social cohesion hypothesis: interactive female marmots remain at home , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  D. Nussey,et al.  The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[41]  C. Schradin Intraspecific variation in social organization by genetic variation, developmental plasticity, social flexibility or entirely extrinsic factors , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  The Evolutionary Significance of Phenotypic Plasticity , 2008 .

[43]  Niels J. Dingemanse,et al.  Between-individual differences in behavioural plasticity within populations: causes and consequences , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[44]  J. Mitani Orangutan activity budgets: Monthly variations and the effects of body size, parturition, and sociality , 1989, American journal of primatology.

[45]  C. Boesch,et al.  Sociality of the dispersing sex: the nature of social bonds in West African female chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  C. P. Schaik,et al.  The hidden costs of sociality: intra-group variation in feeding strategies in Sumatran long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) , 1986 .

[47]  Peter M. Kappeler,et al.  Evolution of Primate Social Systems , 2002, International Journal of Primatology.

[48]  R. D. Alexander,et al.  The evolution of social behavior , 1974 .

[49]  P. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package) , 2014 .

[50]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  The map equation , 2009, 0906.1405.

[51]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Centrality in Social Networks , 1993 .

[52]  Arpat Ozgul,et al.  Coupled dynamics of body mass and population growth in response to environmental change , 2010, Nature.

[53]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Time: a hidden constraint on the behavioural ecology of baboons , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[54]  J. Höglund,et al.  Lek centre attracts black grouse females , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Time as an ecological constraint , 2009, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[56]  Robin I. M. Dunbar Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates , 1992 .

[57]  J. Eisenberg,et al.  Howlers: variations in group size and demography , 1987 .

[58]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Constraints and flexibility in mammalian social behaviour: introduction and synthesis , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[59]  Claudio J. Tessone,et al.  How Random Is Social Behaviour? Disentangling Social Complexity through the Study of a Wild House Mouse Population , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[60]  Hal Whitehead,et al.  SOCPROG programs: analysing animal social structures , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[61]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Group size, grooming and fission in primates: a modeling approach based on group structure. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[62]  J. Silk,et al.  The adaptive value of sociality in mammalian groups , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.