Adhesion of Self-Compacting Overlays Applied to Different Concrete Substrates and Its Prediction by Fuzzy Logic

An experimental and analytical study was performed to evaluate the adhesion between concrete and overlays using five different substrate surfaces and six different mixtures of self-compacting concrete and mortar. Saw cut surfaces of high strength concrete slabs were used as substrate. After the application of self-compacting concrete or mortar layers to dry, saturated surface dry, saturated surface wet, dry with bonding grout, and saturated with bonding grout surfaces of concrete slabs, they were covered with wet hessian and polythene sheets for curing. At the age of 28 days, friction-transfer tests were performed to evaluate the adhesion. The results indicate that while dry and saturated wet surfaces produced the lowest bond strength, the application of cement bonding grout improved the bond strength significantly. The results also showed that despite the noticeable correlations between the adhesion and the results of different flow tests, aggregate/cement ratio, fly ash/cement ratio, compressive strength, and water/powder ratio, the effect of the other constituents of the employed self-compacting overlays on their adhesion were not so significant. In order to predict the adhesion of self-compacting mixtures applied to concrete substrates, a fuzzy logic model was also devised. The results obtained from the fuzzy logic prediction model were compared with the average results of the friction-transfer method and found to be in very close agreement. The results show that fuzzy logic can be used to predict adhesion of self-compacting overlays.

[1]  J. Silfwerbrand,et al.  Better Bonding of Bridge Deck Overlays , 1998 .

[2]  J.A.H. Oates,et al.  Construction and Building , 2007 .

[3]  M. Naderi Analysis of the Slant Shear Test , 2009 .

[4]  L. Courard Adhesion of repair systems to concrete: influence of interfacial topography and transport phenomena , 2005 .

[5]  M. Naderi Effects of Cyclic Loading, Freeze-Thaw and Temperature Changes on Shear Bond Strengths of Different Concrete Repair Systems , 2008 .

[6]  M. Naderi Friction-transfer test for the assessment of in situ strength and adhesion of cementitious materials , 2005 .

[7]  Fernando A. Branco,et al.  CONCRETE-TO-CONCRETE BOND STRENGTH. INFLUENCE OF THE ROUGHNESS OF THE SUBSTRATE SURFACE , 2004 .

[8]  Norbert J. Delatte,et al.  Laboratory and Field Testing of Concrete Bond Development for Expedited Bonded Concrete Overlays , 2000 .

[9]  Norbert J. Delatte,et al.  BOND STRENGTH DEVELOPMENT WITH MATURITY OF HIGH-EARLY-STRENGTH BONDED CONCRETE OVERLAYS , 2000 .

[10]  D. R. Morgan,et al.  Compatibility of concrete repair materials and systems , 1996 .

[11]  J. L. Granju Thin bonded overlays: About the role of fiber reinforcement on the limitation of their debonding , 1996 .

[12]  David A Lange,et al.  EFFECTS OF SHRINKAGE AND TEMPERATURE IN BONDED CONCRETE OVERLAYS , 2004 .

[13]  Vincent Sabathier,et al.  Interface Between an Old Concrete and a Bonded Overlay: Debonding Mechanism , 2004 .

[14]  M Sherman,et al.  CONTROLLING CONCRETE CRACKING AND CURLING , 2004 .

[15]  Luc Courard,et al.  Effect of concrete surface treatment on adhesion in repair systems , 2005 .

[16]  Zongjin Li,et al.  New Understanding of Cement Hydration Mechanism through Electrical Resistivity Measurement and Microstructure Investigations , 2009 .