Subunit architecture of multimeric complexes isolated directly from cells

Recent developments in purification strategies, together with mass spectrometry (MS)‐based proteomics, have identified numerous in vivo protein complexes and suggest the existence of many others. Standard proteomics techniques are, however, unable to describe the overall stoichiometry, subunit interactions and organization of these assemblies, because many are heterogeneous, are present at relatively low cellular abundance and are frequently difficult to isolate. We combine two existing methodologies to tackle these challenges: tandem affinity purification to isolate sufficient quantities of highly pure native complexes, and MS of the intact assemblies and subcomplexes to determine their structural organization. We optimized our protocol with two protein assemblies from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (scavenger decapping and nuclear cap‐binding complexes), establishing subunit stoichiometry and identifying substoichiometric binding. We then targeted the yeast exosome, a nuclease with ten different subunits, and found that by generating subcomplexes, a three‐dimensional interaction map could be derived, demonstrating the utility of our approach for large, heterogeneous cellular complexes.

[1]  Frank Sobott,et al.  Protein complexes gain momentum. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[2]  R. Kraft,et al.  Importin Provides a Link between Nuclear Protein Import and U snRNA Export , 1996, Cell.

[3]  G. Pruijn,et al.  Protein-protein interactions of hCsl4p with other human exosome subunits. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  C. Robinson,et al.  A tandem mass spectrometer for improved transmission and analysis of large macromolecular assemblies. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  K. Breunig,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Elongator mutations confer resistance to the Kluyveromyces lactis zymocin , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[6]  P. Bork,et al.  Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery , 2006, Nature.

[7]  M. Kiledjian,et al.  Functional Link between the Mammalian Exosome and mRNA Decapping , 2001, Cell.

[8]  E. Conti,et al.  The archaeal exosome core is a hexameric ring structure with three catalytic subunits , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[9]  R. Ozawa,et al.  A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  G. Pruijn,et al.  Protein-protein interactions between human exosome components support the assembly of RNase PH-type subunits into a six-membered PNPase-like ring. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  D. Tollervey,et al.  The 'scavenger' m7GpppX pyrophosphatase activity of Dcs1 modulates nutrient-induced responses in yeast. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[13]  K. Hopfner,et al.  Structural framework for the mechanism of archaeal exosomes in RNA processing. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[14]  Xinfu Jiao,et al.  The scavenger mRNA decapping enzyme DcpS is a member of the HIT family of pyrophosphatases , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[15]  B. Séraphin,et al.  A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  Ben Lehner,et al.  The Roles of Intersubunit Interactions in Exosome Stability* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  Carla C Oliveira,et al.  Temperature-sensitive mutants of the exosome subunit Rrp43p show a deficiency in mRNA degradation and no longer interact with the exosome. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  B. Séraphin,et al.  The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. , 2001, Methods.

[19]  D. Görlich,et al.  A yeast cap binding protein complex (yCBC) acts at an early step in pre-mRNA splicing. , 1996, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  Peer Bork,et al.  A complex prediction: three‐dimensional model of the yeast exosome , 2002, EMBO reports.

[21]  C. Clayton,et al.  The exosome of Trypanosoma brucei , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[22]  P. Mitchell,et al.  Musing on the structural organization of the exosome complex , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[23]  S. Cusack,et al.  Large‐scale induced fit recognition of an m7GpppG cap analogue by the human nuclear cap‐binding complex , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[24]  P. Bork,et al.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.

[25]  Roger D Kornberg,et al.  Complete, 12-subunit RNA polymerase II at 4.1-Å resolution: Implications for the initiation of transcription , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  I. Mian,et al.  Arabidopsis thaliana exosome subunit AtRrp4p is a hydrolytic 3'-->5' exonuclease containing S1 and KH RNA-binding domains. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  B. Luisi,et al.  Running rings around RNA: a superfamily of phosphate-dependent RNases. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[28]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[29]  M. Mann,et al.  The Exosome: A Conserved Eukaryotic RNA Processing Complex Containing Multiple 3′→5′ Exoribonucleases , 1997, Cell.

[30]  Ben Lehner,et al.  A protein interaction framework for human mRNA degradation. , 2004, Genome research.

[31]  Frank Alber,et al.  A structural perspective on protein-protein interactions. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.