The perception of finger motions

In this paper, we explore the perception of finger motions of virtual characters. In three experiments, designed to investigate finger animations, we asked the following questions: When are errors in finger motion noticeable? What are the consequences of these errors? What animation method should we recommend? We found that synchronization errors of as little as 0.1s can be detected, but that the perceptibility of errors is highly dependent on the type of motion. Errors in finger animations can change the interpretation of a scene even without altering its perceived quality. Finally, out of the four conditions tested -- original motion capture, no motions, keyframed animation and randomly selected motions -- the original motion captured movements were rated as having the highest quality.

[1]  C. Karen Liu Dextrous manipulation from a grasping pose , 2009, SIGGRAPH 2009.

[2]  Carol O'Sullivan,et al.  Talking bodies: Sensitivity to desynchronization of conversations , 2009, TAP.

[3]  Matthew Stone,et al.  Speaking with hands: creating animated conversational characters from recordings of human performance , 2004, ACM Trans. Graph..

[4]  A. Young,et al.  Emotion Perception from Dynamic and Static Body Expressions in Point-Light and Full-Light Displays , 2004, Perception.

[5]  G. Mather,et al.  Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Perception of Human Motion With Different Geometric Models , 1998, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[7]  Justine Cassell,et al.  BEAT: the Behavior Expression Animation Toolkit , 2001, Life-like characters.

[8]  C W Hutton,et al.  Anatomy and Human Movement: Structure and Function , 1990 .

[9]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Animated conversation: rule-based generation of facial expression, gesture & spoken intonation for multiple conversational agents , 1994, SIGGRAPH.

[10]  Nancy S. Pollard,et al.  Perceptual metrics for character animation: sensitivity to errors in ballistic motion , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[11]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues , 1977 .

[12]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[13]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Construction and animation of anatomically based human hand models , 2003, SCA '03.

[14]  C. Creider Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought , 1994 .

[15]  Dinesh K. Pai,et al.  Musculotendon simulation for hand animation , 2008, SIGGRAPH 2008.

[16]  Victor B. Zordan,et al.  Automatic splicing for hand and body animations , 2006, SCA '06.

[17]  N. Palastanga,et al.  Anatomy and Human Movement: Structure and Function , 1989 .

[18]  Karan Singh,et al.  Eurographics/siggraph Symposium on Computer Animation (2003) Handrix: Animating the Human Hand , 2003 .