Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex

What chiefly distinguishes cerebral cortex from other parts of the central nervous system is the great diversity of its cell types and interconnexions. It would be astonishing if such a structure did not profoundly modify the response patterns of fibres coming into it. In the cat's visual cortex, the receptive field arrangements of single cells suggest that there is indeed a degree of complexity far exceeding anything yet seen at lower levels in the visual system. In a previous paper we described receptive fields of single cortical cells, observing responses to spots of light shone on one or both retinas (Hubel & Wiesel, 1959). In the present work this method is used to examine receptive fields of a more complex type (Part I) and to make additional observations on binocular interaction (Part II). This approach is necessary in order to understand the behaviour of individual cells, but it fails to deal with the problem of the relationship of one cell to its neighbours. In the past, the technique of recording evoked slow waves has been used with great success in studies of functional anatomy. It was employed by Talbot & Marshall (1941) and by Thompson, Woolsey & Talbot (1950) for mapping out the visual cortex in the rabbit, cat, and monkey. Daniel & Whitteiidge (1959) have recently extended this work in the primate. Most of our present knowledge of retinotopic projections, binocular overlap, and the second visual area is based on these investigations. Yet the method of evoked potentials is valuable mainly for detecting behaviour common to large populations of neighbouring cells; it cannot differentiate functionally between areas of cortex smaller than about 1 mm2. To overcome this difficulty a method has in recent years been developed for studying cells separately or in small groups during long micro-electrode penetrations through nervous tissue. Responses are correlated with cell location by reconstructing the electrode tracks from histological material. These techniques have been applied to

[1]  F. Recklinghausen Zum körperlichen Sehen , 2022 .

[2]  M. Minkowski Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Beziehungen der Grosshirnrinde und der Netzhaut zu den primären optischen Zentren, besonders zum Corpus geniculatum externum , 1913 .

[3]  G. H. Bishop FIBER GROUPS IN THE OPTIC NERVE , 1933 .

[4]  G. H. Bishop,et al.  ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY OF THE LATERAL GENICULATE OF CATS FOLLOWING OPTIC NERVE STIMULI , 1940 .

[5]  J. O'leary,et al.  Structure of the area striata of the cat , 1941 .

[6]  S. A. Talbot,et al.  Physiological Studies on Neural Mechanisms of Visual Localization and Discrimination , 1941 .

[7]  S. A. Talbot,et al.  Visual areas I and II of cerebral cortex of rabbit. , 1950, Federation proceedings.

[8]  R. W. DITCHBURN,et al.  Vision with a Stabilized Retinal Image , 1952, Nature.

[9]  L. Riggs,et al.  The disappearance of steadily fixated visual test objects. , 1953, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[10]  S. W. Kuffler Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. , 1953, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  P. S. Silva,et al.  Some anatomical and physiological aspects of the lateral geniculate body , 1956 .

[12]  D. Hubel Tungsten Microelectrode for Recording from Single Units. , 1957, Science.

[13]  V. Mountcastle Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's somatic sensory cortex. , 1957, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  W. Hayhow The cytoarchitecture of the lateral geniculate body in the cat in relation to the distribution of crossed and uncrossed optic fibers , 1958, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  D H HUBEL,et al.  Cortical unit responses to visual stimuli in nonanesthetized cats. , 1958, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  Paul G. Roofe,et al.  The Vertebrate Visual System , 1958, Neurology.

[17]  D. Hubel Single unit activity in striate cortex of unrestrained cats , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  W. Burke,et al.  Activation of Single Lateral eniculate Cells by Stimulation of Either Optic Nerve , 1959, Science.

[19]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Some aspects of the functional organization of the cortex of the postcentral gyrus of the monkey: a correlation of findings obtained in a single unit analysis with cytoarchitecture. , 1959, Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital.

[21]  W. Pitts,et al.  What the Frog's Eye Tells the Frog's Brain , 1959, Proceedings of the IRE.

[22]  W. Pitts,et al.  Anatomy and Physiology of Vision in the Frog (Rana pipiens) , 1960, The Journal of general physiology.

[23]  B. Burns,et al.  Responses of cerebral cortex to diffuse monocular and binocular stimulation. , 1960, The American journal of physiology.

[24]  D. Hubel Single unit activity in lateral geniculate body and optic tract of unrestrained cats , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of optic nerve fibres in the spider monkey , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  S. Erulkar,et al.  Single‐unit activity in the lateral geniculate body of the cat , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  D. Hubel,et al.  Integrative action in the cat's lateral geniculate body , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  P. M. Daniel,et al.  The Representation of the Visual Field on the Calcarine Cortex , 1961 .