Comparison of Canopy Cover Estimations From Airborne LiDAR, Aerial Imagery, and Satellite Imagery

Canopy cover is an important forest structure parameter for many applications in ecology, hydrology, and forest management. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is a promising tool for estimating canopy cover because it can penetrate forest canopy. Various algorithms have been developed to calculate canopy cover from LiDAR data. However, little attention was paid to evaluating how different factors, such as estimation algorithm, LiDAR point density and scan angle, influence canopy cover estimates; and how LiDAR-derived canopy cover differs from estimates using traditional methods, such as field measurements, aerial and satellite imagery. In this study, we systematically compared canopy cover estimations from LiDAR data, quick field measurements, aerial imagery, and satellite imagery using different algorithms. The results show that LiDAR-derived canopy cover estimates are marginally influenced by the estimation algorithms. LiDAR data with a point density of 1 point/m2 can generate comparable canopy cover estimates to data with a higher density. The uncertainty of canopy cover estimates from LiDAR data increased drastically as scan angles exceed 12°. Plot-level canopy cover estimates derived from quick field measurements do not have strong correlation with LiDAR-derived estimations. Both the aerial imagery-derived and satellite imagery-derived canopy cover estimates are comparable to LiDAR-derived canopy cover estimates at the forest stand scale, but tend to be overestimated in sparse forests and be underestimated in dense forests, particularly for the aerial imagery-derived estimates. The results from this study can provide practical guidance for the selection of data sources, sampling schemes, and estimation methods in regional canopy cover mapping.

[1]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Land cover change assessment using decision trees, support vector machines and maximum likelihood classification algorithms , 2010, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[2]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Lidar with multi-temporal MODIS provide a means to upscale predictions of forest biomass , 2015 .

[3]  M. Maltamo,et al.  Effects of pulse density on predicting characteristics of individual trees of Scandinavian commercial species using alpha shape metrics based on airborne laser scanning data , 2008 .

[4]  K. O. Niemann,et al.  Simulated impact of sample plot size and co-registration error on the accuracy and uncertainty of LiDAR-derived estimates of forest stand biomass , 2011 .

[5]  Matti Maltamo,et al.  Airborne discrete-return LIDAR data in the estimation of vertical canopy cover, angular canopy closure and leaf area index , 2011 .

[6]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[7]  Na Li,et al.  Estimation of Individual Tree Parameters Using Small-Footprint LiDAR with Different Density in a Coniferous Forest , 2012 .

[8]  Demetrios Gatziolis,et al.  CoMPArISon oF lIDAr- AnD PHoToInTerPreTATIon-BASeD eSTIMATeS oF CAnoPy Cover , 2012 .

[9]  Kevin Lim,et al.  LiDAR Sampling Density for Forest Resource Inventories in Ontario, Canada , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[10]  A. Lister,et al.  Assessing alternative measures of tree canopy cover: Photo-interpreted NAIP and ground-based estimates , 2012 .

[11]  Zheng Niu,et al.  Geostatistical modeling using LiDAR-derived prior knowledge with SPOT-6 data to estimate temperate forest canopy cover and above-ground biomass via stratified random sampling , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[12]  Håkan Olsson,et al.  Simulating the effects of lidar scanning angle for estimation of mean tree height and canopy closure , 2003 .

[13]  Demetrios Gatziolis,et al.  A Guide to LIDAR Data Acquisition and Processing for the Forests of the Pacific Northwest , 2008 .

[14]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Airborne Lidar-derived volume metrics for aboveground biomass estimation: A comparative assessment for conifer stands , 2014 .

[15]  Max P. Bleiweiss,et al.  Estimation of the fractional canopy cover of pecan orchards using Landsat 5 satellite data, aerial imagery, and orchard floor photographs , 2013 .

[16]  D. Sheil,et al.  Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures , 1999 .

[17]  Geoffrey J. Hay,et al.  A multiscale geographic object-based image analysis to estimate lidar-measured forest canopy height using Quickbird imagery , 2011, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[18]  Nick Reid,et al.  Comparison of Canopy Volume Measurements of Scattered Eucalypt Farm Trees Derived from High Spatial Resolution Imagery and LiDAR , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[19]  J. Wickham,et al.  Completion of the 2001 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States , 2007 .

[20]  E. Næsset.  Effects of different sensors, flying altitudes, and pulse repetition frequencies on forest canopy metrics and biophysical stand properties derived from small-footprint airborne laser data , 2009 .

[21]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  A Vegetation Mapping Strategy for Conifer Forests by Combining Airborne LiDAR Data and Aerial Imagery , 2016 .

[22]  Gang Chen,et al.  When Big Data are Too Much: Effects of LiDAR Returns and Point Density on Estimation of Forest Biomass , 2016, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[23]  Warren B. Cohen,et al.  Modeling Percent Tree Canopy Cover: A Pilot Study , 2012 .

[24]  Marek K. Jakubowski,et al.  Tradeoffs between lidar pulse density and forest measurement accuracy , 2013 .

[25]  Lindsey S. Smart,et al.  Three-dimensional characterization of pine forest type and red-cockaded woodpecker habitat by small-footprint, discrete-return lidar , 2012 .

[26]  Jungho Im,et al.  Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review , 2011 .

[27]  Christopher A. Barnes,et al.  Completion of the 2006 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States. , 2011 .

[28]  K. Lim,et al.  Examining the effects of sampling point densities on laser canopy height and density metrics , 2008 .

[29]  Wenkai Li,et al.  SRTM DEM Correction in Vegetated Mountain Areas through the Integration of Spaceborne LiDAR, Airborne LiDAR, and Optical Imagery , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[30]  Wenkai Li,et al.  Delineating Individual Trees from Lidar Data: A Comparison of Vector- and Raster-based Segmentation Approaches , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[31]  C. Hopkinson.  The influence of flying altitude, beam divergence, and pulse repetition frequency on laser pulse return intensity and canopy frequency distribution , 2007 .

[32]  Janne Heiskanen,et al.  Modelling lidar-derived boreal forest canopy cover with SPOT 4 HRVIR data , 2013 .

[33]  S. Franklin,et al.  Integration of Lidar and Landsat Data to Estimate Forest Canopy Cover in Coastal British Columbia , 2014 .

[34]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Testing LiDAR models of fractional cover across multiple forest ecozones , 2009 .

[35]  Ute Beyer,et al.  Remote Sensing And Image Interpretation , 2016 .

[36]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[37]  Paul F. Hopkins,et al.  Urban cover mapping using digital, high-spatial resolution aerial imagery , 2001, Urban Ecosystems.

[38]  Aniruddha Ghosh,et al.  Assessment of pan-sharpened very high-resolution WorldView-2 images , 2013 .

[39]  M. Rautiainen,et al.  Estimation of forest canopy cover: A comparison of field measurement techniques , 2006 .

[40]  Thomas T. Veblen,et al.  Detection of spruce beetle-induced tree mortality using high- and medium-resolution remotely sensed imagery , 2015 .

[41]  M. D. Nelson,et al.  Mapping U.S. forest biomass using nationwide forest inventory data and moderate resolution information , 2008 .

[42]  Gang Chen,et al.  Article in Press G Model International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation a Geobia Framework to Estimate Forest Parameters from Lidar Transects, Quickbird Imagery and Machine Learning: a Case Study in Quebec, Canada , 2022 .

[43]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Global, 30-m resolution continuous fields of tree cover: Landsat-based rescaling of MODIS vegetation continuous fields with lidar-based estimates of error , 2013, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[44]  A. Hudak,et al.  A cross-comparison of field, spectral, and lidar estimates of forest canopy cover , 2009 .

[45]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[46]  Ross K. Meentemeyer,et al.  Effects of LiDAR point density and landscape context on estimates of urban forest biomass , 2015 .

[47]  Felix Morsdorf,et al.  Estimation of Canopy Cover, Gap Fraction and Leaf Area Index with Airborne Laser Scanning , 2014 .

[48]  G. Hay,et al.  A Support Vector Regression Approach to Estimate Forest Biophysical Parameters at the Object Level Using Airborne Lidar Transects and QuickBird Data , 2011 .

[49]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Forest fuel treatment detection using multi-temporal airborne lidar data and high-resolution aerial imagery: a case study in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, California , 2016 .

[50]  Yun Zhang,et al.  Texture-Integrated Classification of Urban Treed Areas in High-Resolution Color-Infrared Imagery , 2001 .

[51]  Toshinori Kojima,et al.  Stand biomass estimation method by canopy coverage for application to remote sensing in an arid area of Western Australia , 2006 .

[52]  K. Itten,et al.  Estimation of LAI and fractional cover from small footprint airborne laser scanning data based on gap fraction , 2006 .

[53]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Comparison of Laser and Stereo Optical, SAR and InSAR Point Clouds from Air- and Space-Borne Sources in the Retrieval of Forest Inventory Attributes , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[54]  Y. Changa,et al.  AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF LIDAR DATA INTO GROUND AND NON-GROUND POINTS , 2008 .

[55]  R. Pu,et al.  A comparative analysis of high spatial resolution IKONOS and WorldView-2 imagery for mapping urban tree species , 2012 .

[56]  Q. Guo,et al.  Effects of Topographic Variability and Lidar Sampling Density on Several DEM Interpolation Methods , 2010 .

[57]  Yong Pang,et al.  Characterizing forest canopy structure with lidar composite metrics and machine learning , 2011 .

[58]  Huadong Guo,et al.  Retrieval of forest canopy attributes based on a geometric-optical model using airborne LiDAR and optical remote-sensing data , 2012 .

[59]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Lidar sampling for large-area forest characterization: A review , 2012 .