Cognitive distance in research collaborations

This paper addresses the cognitive dimension of proximity/distance in research collaborations of small biotechnology firms. While the theory of optimal cognitive distance assumes learning as motive of collaborations, we suggest that small specialised firms or sub-units of big diversified organizations tend to collaborate with actors endowed with different specific knowledge, with the purpose of accessing rather than acquiring and assimilating the pieces of knowledge they lack. This leads to the expectation of high cognitive distance between collaborators, who however can understand each other since they share the same basic knowledge. We apply this framework to investigate the research collaborations of a sample of Italian biotech firms, using data on the papers co-authored by individuals belonging to different organizations. In order to measure cognitive distance at a very disaggregated level, we introduce an index originally developed by ecologists to measure distance between different species. As expected, most co-publishing partners have high cognitive distance. Moreover, the knowledge accessing motive is also consistent with the finding that even small firms often engage in extensive networks of collaborations with a remarkable variety of actors and do not tend to enlarge their scope over time.

[1]  Karin Knorr Cetina.  The manufacture of knowledge , 1981 .

[2]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Local Nodes in Global Networks: The Geography of Knowledge Flows in Biotechnology Innovation , 2005 .

[3]  D. Hicks.  Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/Private Character of Knowledge , 1995 .

[4]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[5]  P. Saviotti,et al.  The evolution of R&D networking in the biotech industries , 2005 .

[6]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[7]  P. Muller,et al.  Why do firms disclose knowledge and how does it matter? , 2006 .

[8]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Geography Matter for Science-Based Firms? Epistemic Communities and the Geography of Research and Patenting in Biotechnology , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[9]  Jerker Moodysson,et al.  Knowledge Collaboration and Proximity , 2007 .

[10]  P. Cooke,et al.  Biotechnology Clusters as Regional, Sectoral Innovation Systems , 2002 .

[11]  Sabina Nielsen,et al.  Learning and Innovation in International Strategic Alliances: An Empirical Test of the Role of Trust and Tacitness , 2009 .

[12]  Oscar Hauptman,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation: Ikujiro Nonaka and Hirotaka Takeuchi, Oxford University Press, New York, 1995, 2840 pages + vi, cloth $25.00, ISBN 0-19-509269-4 , 1997 .

[13]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity , 2005 .

[14]  Robert J. W. Tijssen,et al.  Is the commercialisation of scientific research affecting the production of public knowledge?: Global trends in the output of corporate research articles , 2004 .

[15]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[16]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[17]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[18]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[19]  F. Tödtling,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems , 2011 .

[20]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Network Embeddedness and the Exploration of Novel Technologies: Technological Distance, Betweenness Centrality and Density , 2006 .

[21]  B. Nooteboom.  Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies , 2000 .

[22]  Amalya L. Oliver,et al.  Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms , 1994 .

[23]  The role of intermediate structures and regional context for the evolution of knowledge networks and structural change , 2004 .

[24]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Knowledge complementarity and innovation , 1994 .

[25]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance , 2004 .

[26]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[27]  G. Dosi,et al.  The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’ , 2006 .

[28]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Clusters, networks, and innovation , 2005 .

[29]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[30]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[31]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[32]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology , 1996 .

[33]  Salih Zeki Ozdemir,et al.  Vertical alliance networks: The case of university–biotechnology–pharmaceutical alliance chains , 2007 .

[34]  B. Nooteboom,et al.  Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: an analysis of multimedia and biotechnology , 2005 .

[35]  C. Vedovello.  Science parks and university-industry interaction: Geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force , 1997 .

[36]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems , 2006 .

[37]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  Coherence of the Knowledge Base and the Firm's Innovative Performance: Evidence from the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry , 2005 .

[38]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Introduction: Origins of the Concept , 1998 .

[39]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[40]  M. Freel,et al.  Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity , 2003 .

[41]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[42]  Amalya L. Oliver,et al.  Three Levels of Networking for Sourcing Intellectual Capital in Biotechnology , 1997 .

[43]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Innovation and inter-firm linkages: new implications for policy , 1999 .

[44]  J. Christensen.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2008 .

[45]  M. Storper.  The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy , 1997 .

[46]  R. Grant,et al.  A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[47]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .