Using Nested Average Electricity Allocation Protocols to Characterize Electrical Grids in Life Cycle Assessment

This study explored the impacts of electricity allocation protocols on the life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of electricity consumption. The selection of appropriate electricity allocation protocols, methodologies that assign pools of electricity generators to electricity consumers, has not been well standardized. This can lead to very different environmental profiles of similar, electricity-intensive processes. In an effort to better represent the interconnected nature of the U.S. electrical grid, we propose two new protocols that utilize inter-regional trade information and localized emission factors to combine generating pools that are sub- or supersets of one another. This new nested approach increases the likelihood of capturing important inter-regional electricity trading and the appropriate assignment of generator emissions to consumers of local and regional electricity. We applied the new and existing protocols to the U.S. primary aluminum industry, an industry whose environmental impact is heavily tied to its electricity consumption. Our analysis found GHG emission factors that were dramatically different than those reported in previous literature. We calculated production-weighted average emission factors of 19.0 and 19.9 kilograms carbon dioxide equivalent per kilogram of primary aluminum ingot produced when using our two nested electricity allocation protocols. Previous studies reported values of 10.5 and 11.0, at least 42% lower than those found by our study.

[1]  Terry Norgate,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from aluminium production - a life cycle approach , 2001 .

[2]  Andrew Burnham,et al.  Updated Life-Cycle Assessment of Aluminum Production and Semi-fabrication for the GREET Model , 2015 .

[3]  Daniel Müller,et al.  Addressing sustainability in the aluminum industry: a critical review of life cycle assessments , 2012 .

[4]  J. Kiviluoma,et al.  The complexity and challenges of determining GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions from grid electricity consumption and conservation in LCA (life cycle assessment) – A methodological review , 2011 .

[5]  C. Weber,et al.  Life cycle assessment and grid electricity: what do we know and what can we know? , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Ellen H.M. Moors,et al.  Technology strategies for sustainable metals production systems: a case study of primary aluminium production in The Netherlands and Norway , 2006 .

[7]  Sampo Soimakallio,et al.  CO2 emissions attributed to annual average electricity consumption in OECD (the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries , 2012 .

[8]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Evaluation of Life Cycle Assessment Recycling Allocation Methods , 2013 .

[9]  Gang Liu,et al.  Unearthing potentials for decarbonizing the U.S. aluminum cycle. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  G. Keoleian,et al.  Not all primary aluminum is created equal: life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from 1990 to 2005. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Nate Blair,et al.  Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS) , 2011 .

[12]  Frank R. Field,et al.  End-of-life LCA allocation methods: Open loop recycling impacts on robustness of material selection decisions , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology.

[13]  Jochen Harnisch,et al.  CO2 emissions related to the electricity consumption in the european primary aluminium production a comparison of electricity supply approaches , 2002 .

[14]  T. Wilbanks,et al.  Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[15]  H Scott Matthews,et al.  Environmental effects of interstate power trading on electricity consumption mixes. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.