Discovery of Chromone‐Based Inhibitors of the Transcription Factor STAT5

Molecular signals originating at the cell surface are conveyed by a complex system of interconnected signaling pathways to the nucleus. They converge at transcription factors, which in turn regulate the transcription of sets of genes which ultimately determine the cellular phenotype. Whereas enzymes involved in signaling pathways, that is, intracellular kinases and phosphatases and receptor tyrosine kinases, have been recognized and exploited as intervention points for modulating cellular properties with small organic molecules, transcription factors are often considered “nondruggable” because of their lack of enzymatic activities. However, as many transcription factors require interactions with themselves or other proteins, cell-permeable inhibitors of protein–protein interactions could provide an approach towards the inhibition of this important class of proteins, and would thereby allow for the analysis of transcription factor functions and for therapeutic intervention of diseased states. 3] Initially regarded as unfeasible, a growing body of evidence indicates that the inhibition of protein–protein interactions can be potently and selectively achieved by drug-like molecules, some of which are even undergoing clinical trials. STATs (signal transducers and activators and transcription) are a family of transcription factors, which require their Src-homology 2 (SH2) domain at two steps of the signaling process to be active. Firstly, STATs need to bind via their SH2 domain to activated receptors and nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (NRTKs), and can subsequently be phosphorylated at a conserved tyrosine residue C-terminal of their SH2 domain (Scheme 1). Secondly, upon tyrosine phosphorylation, STATs dissociate from the respective receptor or NRTK, and form dimers via reciprocal interactions between their SH2 domains and the sequences surrounding the phosphorylated tyrosine residue. Therefore, a small molecule which inhibits the protein–protein interactions mediated by the SH2 domain of STATs could inhibit STAT functions efficiently (Scheme 1). Direct inhibition of STATs is less likely to result in unintentional inhibition of additional signaling pathways than the targeting of upstream kinases. Two STAT family members, STAT3 and STAT5, have been recognized as therapeutic targets for many human tumors. 16] We have recently identified a small-molecule inhibitor of STAT3, which acts by selectively inhibiting the function of the STAT3 SH2 domain, thus validating the outlined approach toward STAT inhibition. Two isoforms of STAT5 exist, dubbed STAT5a and STAT5b, which are 93% identical at the amino acid level. STAT5 is overactive in several kinds of leukemias, and also in breast cancer, uterine cancer, prostate cancer, and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). As the inhibition of signaling by STAT5 has been shown to inhibit tumor growth and to induce apoptosis of tumor cells, direct inhibition of the STAT5 protein would be desirable to help dissect and counteract the role of STAT5 in cancer. Smallmolecule inhibitors of STAT5 could furthermore be useful tools to clarify the relevance of STAT5 for various cellular processes in genetically unmodified systems. Despite the significant interest in small-molecule inhibitors of STAT5, to the best of our knowledge, nonpeptidic molecules which inhibit the function of the STAT5 SH2 domain have not been published to date. To identify organic molecules which can inhibit the function of the SH2 domain of STAT5, we used a homogeneous assay based on fluorescence polarization which monitors binding of the peptide 5-carboxyfluorescein-GYACHTUNGTRENNUNG(PO3H2)LVLDKW, which is derived from the erythropoietin (EPO) receptor, to the SH2 domain of STAT5b. Screening of diverse chemical libraries consisting of a total of 17298 molecules for compounds which disrupt the interaction between STAT5b and its binding peptide led to the identification of the chromone-derived acyl hydrazone 1 (Table 1, apparent IC50=47 17 mm). The functions of the SH2 domains of STAT3, STAT1, and of the tyrosine kinase Lck were inhibited to a lesser extent (Table 1, Figure 1). Scheme 1. Simplified model of STAT signaling induced by activated cytokine receptors. The signaling steps indicated by the dashed arrows (phosphorylation and dimerization) could be inhibited by an inhibitor of the SH2 domain of STAT family members.

[1]  Bianca Sperl,et al.  Selective Inhibition of c‐Myc/Max Dimerization by a Pyrazolo[1,5‐a]pyrimidine , 2007, ChemMedChem.

[2]  Steven Fletcher,et al.  Protein-protein interaction inhibitors: small molecules from screening techniques. , 2007, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[3]  W. Guida,et al.  Selective chemical probe inhibitor of Stat3, identified through structure-based virtual screening, induces antitumor activity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Bianca Sperl,et al.  Stattic: a small-molecule inhibitor of STAT3 activation and dimerization. , 2006, Chemistry & biology.

[5]  H. Arndt Kleine Moleküle als Transkriptionsmodulatoren , 2006 .

[6]  Hans‐Dieter Arndt Small molecule modulators of transcription. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[7]  Dirk Eick,et al.  Selective inhibition of c-Myc/Max dimerization and DNA binding by small molecules. , 2006, Chemistry & biology.

[8]  B. Groner,et al.  Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5), a crucial regulator of immune and cancer cells. , 2005, Current drug targets. Immune, endocrine and metabolic disorders.

[9]  L. Vassilev,et al.  Targeting protein–protein interactions for cancer therapy , 2005, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[10]  Arlin G. Cameron,et al.  Investigation of the binding determinants of phosphopeptides targeted to the SRC homology 2 domain of the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3. Development of a high-affinity peptide inhibitor. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[11]  H. Yin,et al.  Strategien zur Modulation von Protein‐Protein‐Wechselwirkungen mit synthetischen Substanzen , 2005 .

[12]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Strategies for targeting protein-protein interactions with synthetic agents. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.

[13]  S. Korsmeyer,et al.  An inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins induces regression of solid tumours , 2005, Nature.

[14]  Michelle Arkin,et al.  Protein-protein interactions and cancer: small molecules going in for the kill. , 2005, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[15]  Renxiao Wang,et al.  A low-molecular-weight compound discovered through virtual database screening inhibits Stat3 function in breast cancer cells. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Jean Chmielewski,et al.  Inhibiting protein-protein interactions using designed molecules. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[17]  K. Audouze,et al.  Emerging classes of protein-protein interaction inhibitors and new tools for their development. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[18]  Michelle R. Arkin,et al.  Small-molecule inhibitors of protein–protein interactions: progressing towards the dream , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[19]  R. Jove,et al.  Roscovitine inhibits STAT5 activity and induces apoptosis in the human leukemia virus type 1-transformed cell line MT-2. , 2003, Cancer research.

[20]  J. Grandis,et al.  Constitutive activation of Stat5b contributes to carcinogenesis in vivo. , 2003, Cancer research.

[21]  A. Ullrich,et al.  Beyond Herceptin and Gleevec. , 2003, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[22]  T. Berg Modulation von Protein‐Protein‐Wechselwirkungen mit niedermolekularen organischen Molekülen , 2003 .

[23]  T. Berg Modulation of protein-protein interactions with small organic molecules. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[24]  T. Mayer,et al.  Chemical genetics: tailoring tools for cell biology. , 2003, Trends in cell biology.

[25]  J. Darnell Transcription factors as targets for cancer therapy , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[26]  J. Darnell,et al.  Signalling: STATs: transcriptional control and biological impact , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[27]  R. Jove,et al.  Activated STAT signaling in human tumors provides novel molecular targets for therapeutic intervention. , 2002, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[28]  D. Lejeune,et al.  STAT5 activation is required for interleukin-9-dependent growth and transformation of lymphoid cells. , 2000, Cancer research.

[29]  Horst Kessler,et al.  N-methylated cyclic RGD peptides as highly active and selective αvβ3 integrin antagonists , 1999 .

[30]  M. Battegay,et al.  Interferon-alpha activates signal transducers and activators of transcription 5 and 6 in Daudi cells. , 1998, European journal of biochemistry.

[31]  P. Heinrich,et al.  Comparative study on the phosphotyrosine motifs of different cytokine receptors involved in STAT5 activation , 1996, FEBS letters.

[32]  J. Ihle,et al.  Erythropoietin induces activation of Stat5 through association with specific tyrosines on the receptor that are not required for a mitogenic response , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.