Auditory inspection time and intelligence

Abstract The relationship of intelligence to auditory inspection time (AIT) was investigated using tasks derived from the spatial-location method reported by Parker, Crawford, and Stephen (1999). Stereo tone bursts were phase-shifted to create lateralized auditory stimuli, and a high-efficiency staircase was used to systematically vary the duration of the stimulus and determine reliable identification thresholds. As reported by Parker et al., all subjects could complete the task and log(AIT) correlated significantly with the general ability (assessed using Ravens Matrices: r =−0.53). This was independent of pitch discrimination ability. A second experiment examined the reliability of the task in a test–retest design. Test–retest reliability was 0.88, and there was no evidence for learning or practice effects on the task. A modified version of the task was constructed which cued location using binaural differences in volume instead of phase. While the volume and phase-coding methods derive from distinct brain systems, volume IT correlated with phase IT ( r =0.75). It is concluded that auditory inspection time for spatial location is able to be assessed rapidly, reliably, and with high precision, and lends support to the role of processing speed differences as basic to differences in intelligence.

[1]  G. Miller,et al.  Mental Traits as Fitness Indicators: Expanding Evolutionary Psychology's Adaptationism , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Ian J. Deary,et al.  Auditory inspection time, intelligence and pitch discrimination , 1989 .

[3]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Dual streams of auditory afferents target multiple domains in the primate prefrontal cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Functional Specialization in Rhesus Monkey Auditory Cortex , 2001, Science.

[5]  Mm. Liabre Standard Progressive Matrices , 1984 .

[6]  R. Engle,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. , 1999 .

[7]  D. Wechsler Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. , 1955 .

[8]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Modular organization of frequency integration in primary auditory cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  E. Miller Intelligence and brain myelination: A hypothesis , 1994 .

[10]  Timothy C. Bates,et al.  Personality and information processing speed: Independent influences on intelligent performance , 2004 .

[11]  T Nettelbeck,et al.  Intelligence, reaction time, and inspection time. , 1977, American journal of mental deficiency.

[12]  Timothy C. Bates,et al.  Oral creatine monohydrate supplementation improves brain performance: a double–blind, placebo–controlled, cross–over trial , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Con Stough,et al.  Examining neurochemical determinants of inspection time: Development of a biological model , 2001 .

[14]  J. Kaas,et al.  Auditory processing in primate cerebral cortex , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[15]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Space and attention in parietal cortex. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[16]  T. Imig,et al.  Binaural columns in the primary field (A1) of cat auditory cortex , 1977, Brain Research.

[17]  J. Kranzler,et al.  Meta-analysis of the relationship between intelligence and inspection time , 2001 .

[18]  Timothy C. Bates,et al.  Crystallized intelligence as a product of speed and drive for experience: the relationship of inspection time and openness to g and Gc , 2003 .

[19]  H. Eysenck,et al.  A Model for intelligence , 1982 .

[20]  Ian J. Deary,et al.  Intelligence and inspection time: Achievements, prospects, and problems. , 1996 .

[21]  I. Deary,et al.  Intelligence and ‘Inspection Time’ , 1982 .

[22]  Ted Nettelbeck,et al.  Inspection time and IQ: Evidence for a mental speed—ability association , 1986 .

[23]  G. Recanzone Response profiles of auditory cortical neurons to tones and noise in behaving macaque monkeys , 2000, Hearing Research.

[24]  K A Razak,et al.  A systematic representation of interaural intensity differences in the auditory cortex of the pallid bat , 2000, Neuroreport.

[25]  T Nettelbeck,et al.  Perceptual Indices of Performance: The Measurement of ‘Inspection Time’ and ‘Noise’ in the Visual System , 1972, Perception.

[26]  M M Merzenich,et al.  Representation of cochlea within primary auditory cortex in the cat. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Timothy C. Bates,et al.  Intelligence, inspection time, and decision time , 1993 .

[28]  L. Resnick The Nature of Intelligence , 2024 .

[29]  John R. Crawford,et al.  Auditory inspection time and intelligence : A new spatial localization task , 1999 .

[30]  C. Grady,et al.  “What” and “where” in the human auditory system , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Virginia M. Richards,et al.  Stimulus step size and heterogeneous stimulus conditions in adaptive psychophysics , 1989 .

[32]  D. Massaro,et al.  Perceptual Development and Auditory Backward Recognition Masking. , 1991 .

[33]  T. Imig,et al.  Organization of the thalamocortical auditory system in the cat. , 1983, Annual review of neuroscience.

[34]  Dori LeCroy,et al.  Evolutionary perspectives on human reproductive behavior , 2000 .

[35]  G H Recanzone,et al.  Spatial processing in the auditory cortex of the macaque monkey. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  A. Miyake,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control , 1999 .

[37]  G. Miller,et al.  Sexual selection for indicators of intelligence. , 2008, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[38]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  An auditory domain in primate prefrontal cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  R. J. Irwin Inspection Time and Its Relation to Intelligence. , 1984 .

[40]  Henrik Olsson,et al.  Auditory inspection time: on the importance of selecting the appropriate sensory continuum , 1998 .

[41]  D. Massaro,et al.  Backward Recognition Masking in Relative Pitch Judgments , 1977, Perceptual and motor skills.

[42]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions , 1967 .