Collagen/heparin sulfate scaffolds fabricated by a 3D bioprinter improved mechanical properties and neurological function after spinal cord injury in rats.

Effective treatments promoting axonal regeneration and functional recovery for spinal cord injury (SCI) are still in the early stages of development. Most approaches have been focused on providing supportive substrates for guiding neurons and overcoming the physical and chemical barriers to healing that arise after SCI. Although collagen has become a promising natural substrate with good compatibility, its low mechanical properties restrict its potential applications. The mechanical properties mainly rely on the composition and pore structure of scaffolds. For the composition of a scaffold, we used heparin sulfate to react with collagen by crosslinking. For the structure, we adopted a three-dimensional (3D) printing technology to fabricate a scaffold with a uniform pore distributions. We observed that the internal structure of the scaffold printed with a 3D bioprinter was regular and porous. We also found that both the compression modulus and strengths of the scaffold were significantly enhanced by the collagen/heparin sulfate composition compared to a collagen scaffold. Meanwhile, the collagen/heparin sulfate scaffold presented good biocompatibility when it was co-cultured with neural stem cells in vitro. We also demonstrated that heparin sulfate modification significantly improved bFGF immobilization and absorption to the collagen by examining the release kinetics of bFGF from scaffolds. Two months after implantating the scaffold into transection lesions in T10 of the spinal cord in rats, the collagen/heparin sulfate group demonstrated significant recovery of locomotor function and according to electrophysiological examinations. Parallel to functional recovery, collagen/heparin sulfate treatment further ameliorated the pathological process and markedly increased the number of neurofilament (NF) positive cells compared to collagen treatment alone. These data suggested that a collagen/heparin sulfate scaffold fabricated by a 3D bioprinter could enhance the mechanical properties of collagen and provide continuous guidance channels for axons, which would improve the neurological function after SCI. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 105A: 1324-1332, 2017.

[1]  S. Soker,et al.  Heparin-modified gelatin scaffolds for human corneal endothelial cell transplantation. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[2]  D. Basso,et al.  A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. , 1995, Journal of neurotrauma.

[3]  Yunliang Chen,et al.  Perturbation of the heparin/heparin-sulfate interactome of human breast cancer cells modulates pro-tumourigenic effects associated with PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK signalling , 2013, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[4]  Byung-Soo Kim,et al.  Comparison between heparin-conjugated fibrin and collagen sponge as bone morphogenetic protein-2 carriers for bone regeneration , 2012, Experimental & Molecular Medicine.

[5]  J. Kellerth,et al.  Biopolymers and biodegradable smart implants for tissue regeneration after spinal cord injury , 2003, Current opinion in neurology.

[6]  Ying Mei,et al.  3D printing facilitated scaffold-free tissue unit fabrication , 2014, Biofabrication.

[7]  Byung-Soo Kim,et al.  Heparin-conjugated fibrin as an injectable system for sustained delivery of bone morphogenetic protein-2. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[8]  Siobhan McMahon,et al.  Current tissue engineering and novel therapeutic approaches to axonal regeneration following spinal cord injury using polymer scaffolds , 2009, Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology.

[9]  G. Biswas,et al.  Some characteristics of collagen-heparin complex. , 1983, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  Gregory R. D. Evans,et al.  Clinical long-term in vivo evaluation of poly(L-lactic acid) porous conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration , 2000, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[11]  Jesús Avila,et al.  Functional Recovery of Paraplegic Rats and Motor Axon Regeneration in Their Spinal Cords by Olfactory Ensheathing Glia , 2000, Neuron.

[12]  Robert Langer,et al.  Functional recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury mediated by a unique polymer scaffold seeded with neural stem cells , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  S. Ricard-Blum,et al.  Structural Requirements for Heparin/Heparan Sulfate Binding to Type V Collagen* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  G. Moonen,et al.  Poly(D,L-lactide) foams modified by poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(D,L-lactide) copolymers and a-FGF: in vitro and in vivo evaluation for spinal cord regeneration. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[15]  Eric A Nauman,et al.  Mechanical characterization of collagen fibers and scaffolds for tissue engineering. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[16]  E. J. Miller,et al.  Effect of physical crosslinking methods on collagen-fiber durability in proteolytic solutions. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[17]  D. Mcallister,et al.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of heparin mediated growth factor release from tissue‐engineered constructs for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2015, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  J. Lee,et al.  Biocompatibility and remodeling potential of pure arterial elastin and collagen scaffolds , 2005 .

[19]  Charles Tator,et al.  Bioengineered strategies for spinal cord repair. , 2006, Journal of neurotrauma.

[20]  Gilberto Goissis,et al.  Biocompatibility of anionic collagen matrix as scaffold for bone healing. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[21]  Yandong Gao,et al.  Multilayered Heparin Hydrogel Microwells for Cultivation of Primary Hepatocytes , 2014, Advanced healthcare materials.

[22]  C. Cao,et al.  Cytocompatibility and blood compatibility of multifunctional fibroin/collagen/heparin scaffolds. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[23]  R. Iozzo.  Matrix proteoglycans: from molecular design to cellular function. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.

[24]  S. Andreadis,et al.  Crosslinking of discrete self-assembled collagen threads: Effects on mechanical strength and cell-matrix interactions. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[25]  J. Schwab,et al.  Experimental strategies to promote spinal cord regeneration—an integrative perspective , 2006, Progress in Neurobiology.

[26]  Derek H. Rosenzweig,et al.  3D-Printed ABS and PLA Scaffolds for Cartilage and Nucleus Pulposus Tissue Regeneration , 2015, International journal of molecular sciences.

[27]  Albert J Banes,et al.  Novel system for engineering bioartificial tendons and application of mechanical load. , 2003, Tissue engineering.

[28]  Fred H. Gage,et al.  Therapeutic interventions after spinal cord injury , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  Jason A Inzana,et al.  3D printing of composite calcium phosphate and collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[30]  A. Ori,et al.  The heparanome and regulation of cell function: structures, functions and challenges. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[31]  S. Heilshorn,et al.  Biomaterial design strategies for the treatment of spinal cord injuries. , 2010, Journal of neurotrauma.

[32]  C H Tator,et al.  Objective clinical assessment of motor function after experimental spinal cord injury in the rat. , 1977, Journal of neurosurgery.