Evaluation of GRAMM low‐resolution docking methodology on the hemagglutinin‐antibody complex

A single protein–protein pair, the complex of the influenza virus hemagglutinin with an antibody (Fab BH151), was suggested for prediction at the second experiment on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction. To predict the structure of the complex, we applied our docking program GRAMM at a decreased resolution (to accommodate the conformational inaccuracies). The lowest‐energy match showed a remarkable “low‐resolution” surface complementarity between the molecular structures. After receiving the experimental structure of the complex we had a chance to verify our assumptions and results. The analysis of the hemagglutinin–antibody interface revealed several significant conformational changes in the side chains, which resulted in deep interpenetrations of the hemagglutinin and the antibody structures. This confirmed our initial assumption that the structural changes will be beyond the tolerance of high‐resolution rigid‐body docking. The comparison of the predicted low‐resolution match, submitted as the solution, and the experimentally determined complex showed significant structural discrepancies in the orientation of the antibody, due to the low‐resolution character of the docking. Because of the severe structural errors, no residue–residue contacts were predicted correctly. However, a significant part of the antigenic site was determined. This illustrates the practical value of the present methodology for the initial prediction of the binding site, as well as points out the problem of transition from the low‐resolution predictions of protein–protein complexes to the accurate structure. Proteins, Suppl. 1:226–230, 1997. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J. S. Dixon,et al.  Evaluation of the CASP2 docking section , 1997, Proteins.

[2]  J. Janin,et al.  Principles of protein-protein recognition from structure to thermodynamics. , 1995, Biochimie.

[3]  C. Frömmel,et al.  The automatic search for ligand binding sites in proteins of known three-dimensional structure using only geometric criteria. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  C. Aflalo,et al.  Hydrophobic docking: A proposed enhancement to molecular recognition techniques , 1994, Proteins.

[5]  M. Lawrence,et al.  Shape complementarity at protein/protein interfaces. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  I. Vakser.  Protein docking for low-resolution structures. , 1995, Protein engineering.

[7]  A. Olson,et al.  Approximation and characterization of molecular surfaces , 1993, Biopolymers.

[8]  D. Eisenberg.  Into the black of night , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[9]  J. Janin,et al.  Protein-protein recognition. , 1995, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[10]  J. Cherfils,et al.  Molecular docking programs successfully predict the binding of a β-lactamase inhibitory protein to TEM-1 β-lactamase , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[11]  Chris M. W. Ho,et al.  Cavity search: An algorithm for the isolation and display of cavity-like binding regions , 1990, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[12]  Ilya A. Vakser,et al.  Protein Docking in the Absence of Detailed Molecular Structures , 1995 .

[13]  G. Rose,et al.  Antigenic determinants in proteins coincide with surface regions accessible to large probes (antibody domains). , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  E. Katchalski‐Katzir,et al.  Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  B C Finzel,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of an antibody-antigen complex. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  I A Vakser.  Long-distance potentials: an approach to the multiple-minima problem in ligand-receptor interaction. , 1996, Protein engineering.

[17]  I. Vakser.  Low-resolution docking: prediction of complexes for underdetermined structures. , 1998, Biopolymers.

[18]  M. Swindells,et al.  Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function. , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[19]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Protein-protein interfaces: architectures and interactions in protein-protein interfaces and in protein cores. Their similarities and differences. , 1996, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[20]  I. Vakser,et al.  Main-chain complementarity in protein-protein recognition. , 1996, Protein engineering.