A Risk Assessment Method of Bridge Facilities Damage in the Aspect of Potential Terrorist Attacks

The question of terrorism is becoming a principal problem which influences social safety. Terrorist acts are aimed at frightening people and destabilisation of normal functioning of the state. Terrorists are trying to achieve this goal by bombing civilians and public utility facilities including transport system facilities. One of the elements of a transport system is its infrastructure consisting of roads, railways and bridge facilities. This last element encompasses for example bridges, viaducts, flyovers and culverts. Taking into account the fact that bridge facilities are extremely sensitive to terrorist attacks, the authors of this article decided to focus on them in this study. The work presents an original method of damage risk assessment in engineering facilities in the aspect of potential terrorist attacks. The method is based on two selected multi-criteria optimisation methods. The subject of analyses were four selected bridge facilities. The results of the conducted research and analyses were risk assessments of selected bridges. An advantage of the presented solution is the possibility to justify the adopted hierarchy of decision variants. Using the proposed method one can obtain specific numerical values. They can be used in further analyses conducted on a wider scale and to build a hierarchized database of facilities prone to terrorist attacks.

[1]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[2]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey , 2004 .

[3]  Dariusz Skorupka,et al.  Evaluation of Probability of Bridge Damage as a Result of Terrorist Attack , 2013 .

[4]  Oleg Kapliński,et al.  Three phases of multifactor modelling of construction processes , 2006 .

[5]  Makarand Hastak,et al.  ICRAM-1: Model for International Construction Risk Assessment , 2000 .

[6]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DERIVING THE AHP 1-9 SCALE FROM FIRST PRINCIPLES , 2001 .

[7]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2012 .

[8]  M. Połoński,et al.  Impact of Baseline Terms on the Course of Critical Paths and Time Buffers in the Modified Goldratt’s Method , 2013 .

[9]  Dariusz Skorupka Method of Construction Projects Risk Assessment , 2012 .

[10]  Agnieszka Leśniak,et al.  Overhead costs and profit calculation by Polish contractors , 2013 .

[11]  Tadeusz Kasprowicz,et al.  COST-TIME SCHEDULING OF CONSTRUCTION WORKS EXECUTION , 2000 .

[12]  Dariusz Skorupka,et al.  Ocena ryzyka uszkodzenia obiektów mostowych , 2013 .

[13]  Zhijian Lu,et al.  The Study on Venture Capital Project Appraisal using AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Methods , 2011 .

[14]  Dariusz Skorupka,et al.  Identification and Initial Risk Assessment of Construction Projects in Poland , 2008 .

[15]  Yu Jing,et al.  A discussion on Extent Analysis Method and applications of fuzzy AHP , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Allan Herbert Willett,et al.  The Economic Theory Of Risk And Insurance , 2022 .

[17]  T. Saaty Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2005 .

[18]  James C. Ray Risk-Based Prioritization of Terrorist Threat Mitigation Measures on Bridges , 2007 .

[19]  Agata Czarnigowska,et al.  Analysis of supply system models for planning construction project logistics , 2005 .

[20]  Xiao-Jun Yang,et al.  How to handle uncertainties in AHP: The Cloud Delphi hierarchical analysis , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[21]  F. Knight The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .