Indirect Reciprocity Game Modelling for Cooperation Stimulation in Cognitive Networks

In cognitive networks, since nodes generally belong to different authorities and pursue different goals, they will not cooperate with others unless cooperation can improve their own performance. Thus, how to stimulate cooperation among nodes in cognitive networks is very important. However, most of existing game-theoretic cooperation stimulation approaches rely on the assumption that the interactions between any pair of players are long-lasting. When this assumption is not true, according to the well-known Prisoner's Dilemma and the backward induction principle, the unique Nash equilibrium (NE) is to always play non-cooperatively. In this paper, we propose a cooperation stimulation scheme for the scenario where the number of interactions between any pair of players are finite. The proposed algorithm is based on indirect reciprocity game modelling where the key concept is "I help you not because you have helped me but because you have helped others". We formulate the problem of finding the optimal action rule as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) and propose a modified value iteration algorithm to find the optimal action rule. Using the packet forwarding game as an example, we show that with an appropriate cost-to-gain ratio, the strategy of forwarding the number of packets that is equal to the reputation level of the receiver is an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS). Finally, simulations are shown to verify the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

[1]  Zhu Han,et al.  Information theoretic framework of trust modeling and evaluation for ad hoc networks , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[2]  Sheng Zhong,et al.  Sprite: a simple, cheat-proof, credit-based system for mobile ad-hoc networks , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[3]  Debao Xiao,et al.  Understanding Peer Behavior and Designing Incentive Mechanism in Peer-to-Peer Networks: An Analytical Model Based on Game Theory , 2007, ICA3PP.

[4]  Silvia Giordano,et al.  Modelling cooperation in mobile ad hoc networks: a formal description of selfishness , 2003 .

[5]  Pietro Michiardi,et al.  A game theoretical approach to evaluate cooperation enforcement mechanisms in mobile ad hoc networks , 2003 .

[6]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  Attack-resistant cooperation stimulation in autonomous ad hoc networks , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[7]  Allen B. MacKenzie,et al.  Cognitive networks: adaptation and learning to achieve end-to-end performance objectives , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .

[9]  J.-P. Hubaux,et al.  Enforcing service availability in mobile ad-hoc WANs , 2000, 2000 First Annual Workshop on Mobile and Ad Hoc Networking and Computing. MobiHOC (Cat. No.00EX444).

[10]  Stephan Eidenbenz,et al.  Ad hoc-VCG: a truthful and cost-efficient routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks with selfish agents , 2003, MobiCom '03.

[11]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[12]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  Game Theoretic Analysis of Cooperation Stimulation and Security in Autonomous Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[13]  Sheng Zhong,et al.  On designing incentive-compatible routing and forwarding protocols in wireless ad-hoc networks: an integrated approach using game theoretical and cryptographic techniques , 2005, MobiCom '05.

[14]  Jean-Yves Le Boudec,et al.  Performance analysis of the CONFIDANT protocol , 2002, MobiHoc '02.

[15]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  Incentive Cooperation Strategies for Peer-to-Peer Live Multimedia Streaming Social Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[16]  Refik Molva,et al.  Core: a collaborative reputation mechanism to enforce node cooperation in mobile ad hoc networks , 2002, Communications and Multimedia Security.

[17]  Levente Buttyán,et al.  Nash equilibria of packet forwarding strategies in wireless ad hoc networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[18]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Indirect reciprocity provides a narrow margin of efficiency for costly punishment , 2008, Nature.

[19]  Kevin Leyton-Brown,et al.  Incentives for sharing in peer-to-peer networks , 2001, EC '01.

[20]  John Maynard Smith Evolution and the Theory of Games: Mixed strategies – II. Examples , 1982 .

[21]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity , 2005, Nature.

[22]  Emin Gün Sirer,et al.  KARMA : A Secure Economic Framework for Peer-to-Peer Resource Sharing , 2003 .

[23]  Vikram Srinivasan,et al.  Cooperation in wireless ad hoc networks , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[24]  Jon Crowcroft,et al.  Modelling incentives for collaboration in mobile ad hoc networks , 2004, Perform. Evaluation.

[25]  Mary Baker,et al.  Mitigating routing misbehavior in mobile ad hoc networks , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[26]  Hector Garcia-Molina,et al.  Limited reputation sharing in P2P systems , 2004, EC '04.

[27]  Mostafa H. Ammar,et al.  A reputation system for peer-to-peer networks , 2003, NOSSDAV '03.