Research Trends in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology in India

This paper attempts to highlight quantitatively the growth and development of Indian research in the field of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology in terms of publication output as per Science Citation Index (1982-2008). The whole database contains 296072 records on the subject and among them USA topped the list with 84561 (28.56 per cent) followed by, China with 43393 (14.66 per cent) publications, Japan with 32431 (10.95 per cent) publications, Germany with 28065 (9.48 per cent) publications, France with 18141 (6.13 per cent) publications, and England with 13850 (4.68 per cent) publications. During 1982-2008, a total of 8326 (2.81 per cent) papers were published by the Indian scientists in the field. The yearly average number of documents published was 308.37. The highest numbers of publications (1890) were published in 2008. The premier Indian institutes engaged in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology research were: Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangaluru with 723 publications followed by IIT Kharagpur with 606 publications; National Chemical Laboratories (NCL), Pune with 589 publications; Indian Association for the Cultivation of science (IACS), Kolkata with 563 publications; and BARC, Mumbai with 434 publications. Major portion of the publications (96.36 per cent) were written in collaboration with more than one authors. India had collaboration with 67 other countries in the field. C.N.R. Rao, M. Sastry and S. Chaudhuri were the three leading researchers in the field. Researchers from Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore and Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore had most number of collaborative publications. When collaboration among institutes situated in different Indian cities was taken into consideration, Bangaluru and Kolkata were found to have the highest number of collaborative publications. Karnataka and West Bengal, the parent states of these cities were the states with the most collaborative publications in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology research. USA, Germany, and Japan had more number of collaborative publications with India. The most preferred journals for publishing the articles by the scientists were: Journal of Applied Physics (293), Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (285), Applied Physics Letters (243), Materials Letters (232), Physical Review B (232), Nanotechnology (194), and Langmuir (182). The highly occurred keywords in SCI records were: Nanoparticles (1244); Particles (756); Films (589); Growth (513); Nanocrystals (501); Thin-Films (484); Nanostructures (427); Optical-Properties (410); Nanocomposites (401); etc. DOI: 10.14429/djlit.30.6

[1]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Domain Study 'Nanotechnology: Analysis of an Emerging Domain of Scientific and Technological Endeavour' , 2003 .

[2]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  International strategy for nanotechnology research and development , 2001 .

[3]  Roland Wiesendanger,et al.  Nanoscience and technology , 1998 .

[4]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Nanoscience and nanotecnology on the balance , 1997, Scientometrics.

[5]  Jingjing Zhang,et al.  Language trends in nanoscience and technology: The case of Chinese-language publications , 2007, Scientometrics.

[6]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[7]  Praveen Sharma,et al.  Activity and Growth of Organic Chemistry Research in India During 1971–1989 , 2000, Scientometrics.

[8]  J. Youtie,et al.  Nanotechnology publications and citations by leading countries and blocs , 2008 .

[9]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  China's emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology: A comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience ‘giants’ , 2007 .

[10]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  Connecting NSF funding to patent innovation in nanotechnology (2001–2004) , 2006 .

[11]  Michael A. Wilson,et al.  Nanotechnology: Basic Science and Emerging Technologies , 2002 .

[12]  Zan Huang,et al.  Longitudinal Nanotechnology Development (1991--2002): National Science Foundation Funding and its Impact on Patents , 2005 .

[13]  Joachim Schummer,et al.  Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology , 2004, Scientometrics.

[14]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Publications and patents in nanotechnology , 2003, Scientometrics.

[15]  M. Meyer,et al.  Nanotechnology-interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application , 1998, Scientometrics.

[16]  Joachim Schummer The global institutionalization of nanotechnology research: A bibliometric approach to the assessment of science policy , 2007, Scientometrics.

[17]  Raymond G. Koytcheff,et al.  Technical structure of the global nanoscience and nanotechnology literature , 2007 .