FORAGING IN A PATCHY AND DYNAMIC LANDSCAPE: HUMAN LAND USE AND THE WHITE STORK

In the agricultural landscapes of Europe, the White Stork (Ciconia ciconia) prefers to forage on meadows with short vegetation. Thus, food supply for the nestlings and, consequently, breeding success of this central-place forager depend on the temporal and spatial mowing activities of farmers around the nest to generate a patchy and dynamic food availability. Using a spatially explicit model, we study the impact of different land use patterns on food supply and breeding success of a central-place forager. The conclusions of our model are twofold. First, for the White Stork, our model suggests that sequential (asynchronous) mowing increases breeding success compared to the synchronous mowing activities presently applied by farmers. Second and more generally, we conclude that, with increasing heterogeneity and dynamics of the landscape, the patch selection strategy be- comes increasingly important for predicting food supply. Thus, landscape-oriented behavior is an important, but often neglected, component of conservation biology and management, especially in agricultural landscapes.

[1]  John R. Krebs,et al.  INDIVIDUAL DECISIONS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF PREDATORS IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT. II. THE INFLUENCE OF TRAVEL COSTS AND STRUCTURE OF THE ENVIRONMENT , 1991 .

[2]  Karin Johst,et al.  Evolution of complex dynamics in spatially structured populations , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  R. Peters The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .

[4]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution , 1997 .

[5]  C. Clark,et al.  Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology , 2019 .

[6]  J. Roland,et al.  Insect parasitoid species respond to forest structure at different spatial scales , 1997, Nature.

[7]  A. Gigon Agricultural sustainability does not imply biocenotic sustainability , 1999 .

[8]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Influence of Conspecific Attraction on the Spatial Distribution of Learning Foragers in a Patchy Habitat. , 1997 .

[9]  Marc Mangel,et al.  Individuals on the landscape : behavior can mitigate landscape differences among habitats , 1997 .

[10]  E. Charnov Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[11]  T. Caro,et al.  The behaviour-conservation interface. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  M. McPeek,et al.  The Evolution of Dispersal in Spatially and Temporally Varying Environments , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[13]  N. B. Kotliar,et al.  Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity , 1990 .

[14]  J. K. Wetterer Central place foraging theory: When load size affects travel time , 1989 .

[15]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  William W. Hargrove,et al.  Predicting spatial distribution of foragers over large resource landscapes : a modeling analysis of the Ideal Free Distribution , 1997 .

[17]  K. Johst,et al.  Evolution of dispersal: the importance of the temporal order of reproduction and dispersal , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  J. Wiens,et al.  FORAGING PATCH SELECTION BY SHRUBSTEPPE SPARROWS , 1998 .

[19]  Karin Johst,et al.  The effect of dispersal on local population dynamics , 1997 .

[20]  J. Alonso,et al.  Habitat selection by foraging White Storks, Ciconia ciconia, during the breeding season , 1991 .

[21]  B. Danielson,et al.  Spatially Explicit Population Models: Current Forms and Future Uses , 1995 .