A Mobility Framework for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks

Mobility management in ad hoc wireless networks faces many challenges. Mobility constantly causes the network topology to change. In order to keep accurate routes, the routing protocols must dynamically readjust to such changes. Thus, routing update traffic overhead is significantly high. Different mobility patterns have in general different impact on a specific network protocol or application. Consequently the network performance will be strongly influenced by the nature of the mobility pattern. In the past, mobility models were rather casually used to evaluate network performance under different routing protocols. Here, we propose a universal mobility framework, Mobility Vector Model, which can be used for recreating the various mobility patterns produced in different applications. Case studies on optimal transmission range as a function of mobility and on network performance under various mobility models are presented in the paper. Simulation results show that excessively large transmission range will not improve network performance significantly because of the increased collisions. There is an optimal range between 1.5 - 2 times the mean node distance for free space channel. Also, simulation results show that different mobility models will have different impact on the network performance for a variety of routing protocols (AODV, DSR, FSR). When choosing routing protocols for ad hoc network applications, performance studies under multiple mobility models are recommended. The Mobility Vector model can provide a realistic and flexible framework for reproducing various models.

[1]  Mineo Takai,et al.  Parssec: A Parallel Simulation Environment for Complex Systems , 1998, Computer.

[2]  Prem Dassanayake,et al.  User Mobility Modeling and Characterization of Mobility Patterns , 1997, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[3]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[4]  Atsushi Iwata,et al.  Scalable routing strategies for ad hoc wireless networks , 1999, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[5]  Mario Gerla,et al.  Clustering with power control , 1999, MILCOM 1999. IEEE Military Communications. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36341).

[6]  David A. Maltz,et al.  Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 1994, Mobidata.

[7]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks , 2001, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[8]  Mario Gerla,et al.  GloMoSim: A Scalable Network Simulation Environment , 2002 .

[9]  Bartosz Mielczarek,et al.  Scenario-based performance analysis of routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks , 1999, MobiCom.

[10]  Mario Gerla,et al.  A simulation study of table-driven and on-demand routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks , 1999, IEEE Netw..

[11]  Xiaoyan Hong,et al.  A group mobility model for ad hoc wireless networks , 1999, MSWiM '99.

[12]  David A. Maltz,et al.  A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols , 1998, MobiCom '98.