Passive state preparation in the Gaussian-modulated coherent-states quantum key distribution

In the Gaussian-modulated coherent states (GMCS) quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol, Alice prepares quantum states \emph{actively}: for each transmission, Alice generates a pair of Gaussian-distributed random numbers, encodes them on a weak coherent pulse using optical amplitude and phase modulators, and then transmits the Gaussian-modulated weak coherent pulse to Bob. Here we propose a \emph{passive} state preparation scheme using a thermal source. In our scheme, Alice splits the output of a thermal source into two modes using a beam splitter. She measures one mode locally using conjugate optical homodyne detectors, and transmits the other mode to Bob after applying appropriate optical attenuation. Under normal condition, Alice's measurement results are correlated to Bob's, and they can work out a secure key as in the active state preparation scheme. Given the initial thermal state generated by the source is strong enough, this scheme can tolerate high detector noise at Alice's side. Furthermore, the output of the source does not need to be single mode, since an optical homodyne detector can selectively measure a single mode determined by the local oscillator. Preliminary experimental results suggest that the proposed scheme could be implemented using an off-the-shelf amplified spontaneous emission source.

[1]  Zhu Cao,et al.  Quantum random number generation , 2015, npj Quantum Information.

[2]  N. Lutkenhaus,et al.  Passive sources for the Bennett-Brassard 1984 quantum-key-distribution protocol with practical signals , 2010, 1009.3830.

[3]  Radim Filip Continuous-variable quantum key distribution with noisy coherent states , 2008 .

[4]  Christian Weedbrook,et al.  Quantum cryptography without switching. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[5]  Yi Zhao,et al.  Experimental quantum key distribution with active phase randomization , 2006, quant-ph/0611059.

[6]  E. Diamanti,et al.  Analysis of Imperfections in Practical Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution , 2012, 1206.6357.

[7]  Xiang Peng,et al.  Continuous-variable quantum key distribution with Gaussian source noise , 2011, 1101.0871.

[8]  Miguel Herrero-Collantes,et al.  Quantum random number generators , 2016, 1604.03304.

[9]  C. Silberhorn,et al.  Quantum key distribution with passive decoy state selection , 2007 .

[10]  T. Ralph,et al.  Continuous variable quantum cryptography , 1999, quant-ph/9907073.

[11]  Hao Qin,et al.  Coexistence of continuous variable QKD with intense DWDM classical channels , 2014, 1412.1403.

[12]  Bing Qi,et al.  Practical challenges in quantum key distribution , 2016, npj Quantum Information.

[13]  Guo Guangcan,et al.  Experimental demonstration of passive decoy state quantum key distribution , 2012 .

[14]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[15]  V. Scarani,et al.  The security of practical quantum key distribution , 2008, 0802.4155.

[16]  T. Moroder,et al.  Passive decoy-state quantum key distribution with practical light sources , 2009, 0911.2815.

[17]  E. Diamanti,et al.  Improvement of continuous-variable quantum key distribution systems by using optical preamplifiers , 2008, 0812.4314.

[18]  Radim Filip,et al.  Continuous-variable quantum key distribution with a leakage from state preparation , 2017 .

[19]  Valerio Pruneri,et al.  Passive decoy state quantum key distribution with coherent light , 2010, 2010 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication (OFC/NFOEC), collocated National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[20]  H. Lo,et al.  Quantum key distribution with triggering parametric down-conversion sources , 2008, 0803.2543.

[21]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[22]  H A Haus,et al.  Photon statistics of amplified spontaneous emission noise in a 10-Gbit/s optically preamplified direct-detection receiver. , 1998, Optics letters.

[23]  Masato Koashi,et al.  Simple and efficient quantum key distribution with parametric down-conversion. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[24]  H. Lo,et al.  Experimental study on the Gaussian-modulated coherent-state quantum key distribution over standard telecommunication fibers , 2007, 0709.3666.

[25]  Xiang‐Bin Wang,et al.  Beating the PNS attack in practical quantum cryptography , 2004 .

[26]  Ekert,et al.  Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[27]  Shi-Hai Sun,et al.  Experimental demonstration of passive-decoy-state quantum key distribution with two independent lasers , 2016 .

[28]  Yang Wang,et al.  Tight finite-key analysis for passive decoy-state quantum key distribution under general attacks , 2014, 1406.0387.

[29]  Eleni Diamanti,et al.  Distributing Secret Keys with Quantum Continuous Variables: Principle, Security and Implementations , 2015, Entropy.

[30]  Bing Qi,et al.  True randomness from an incoherent source. , 2016, The Review of scientific instruments.

[31]  Andrew G. Glen,et al.  APPL , 2001 .

[32]  M. Curty,et al.  Secure quantum key distribution , 2014, Nature Photonics.

[33]  Peng Huang,et al.  Long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution by controlling excess noise , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[34]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Quantum cryptography approaching the classical limit. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[35]  Vladyslav C. Usenko,et al.  Feasibility of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with noisy coherent states , 2009, 0904.1694.

[36]  Xiongfeng Ma,et al.  Decoy state quantum key distribution. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[37]  Won-Young Hwang Quantum key distribution with high loss: toward global secure communication. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[38]  R. Glauber The Quantum Theory of Optical Coherence , 1963 .

[39]  G. Guo,et al.  Practical non-Poissonian light source for passive decoy state quantum key distribution. , 2010, Optics letters.

[40]  M. Hillery Quantum cryptography with squeezed states , 1999, quant-ph/9909006.

[41]  Xiang Peng,et al.  Source monitoring for continuous-variable quantum key distribution , 2012 .

[42]  M. Fejer,et al.  Experimental passive decoy-state quantum key distribution , 2014, 2014 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO) - Laser Science to Photonic Applications.

[43]  Yang Wang,et al.  Passive decoy-state quantum key distribution using weak coherent pulses with intensity fluctuations , 2013, 1312.7383.

[44]  Zach DeVito,et al.  Opt , 2017 .

[45]  S. McLaughlin,et al.  Quantum key distribution over 25 km with an all-fiber continuous-variable system , 2007, 0706.4255.

[46]  Eleni Diamanti,et al.  Experimental demonstration of long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution , 2012, Nature Photonics.

[47]  N. Cerf,et al.  Quantum key distribution using gaussian-modulated coherent states , 2003, Nature.

[48]  Premjeet Kumar,et al.  Photon statistics of single-mode zeros and ones from an erbium-doped fiber amplifier measured by means of homodyne tomography , 2000 .

[49]  Vladyslav C. Usenko,et al.  Trusted Noise in Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution: A Threat and a Defense , 2016, Entropy.

[50]  Bing Qi,et al.  Generating the local oscillator "locally" in continuous-variable quantum key distribution based on coherent detection , 2015, 1503.00662.

[51]  T. Moroder,et al.  Non-Poissonian statistics from Poissonian light sources with application to passive decoy state quantum key distribution. , 2009, Optics letters.