FROM FLOW TO FISH TO DOLLARS: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO WATER ALLOCATION 1

This paper details a case study of economic and natural system responses to alternative water management policies in the Cache La Poudre River basin, Colorado, 1980-1994. The case study is presented to highlight the value and application of a conceptual integration of economic, salmonid population, physical habitat, and water allocation models. Five alternative regimes, all intended to increase low winter flows, were investigated. Habitat enhancements created by alternative regimes were translated to population responses and economic benefits. Analysis concluded that instream flows cannot compete on the northern Colorado water rental market; cooperative agreements offer an economically feasible way to enhance instream flows; and establishing an instream flow program on the Cache La Poudre River mainstem is a potentially profitable opportunity. The alliance of models is a dynamic multidisciplinary tool for use in professional settings and offers valuable insight for decision-making processes involved in water management.

[1]  John M. Bartholow,et al.  Conceptual model for quantifying pre‐smolt production from flow‐dependent physical habitat and water temperature , 1993 .

[2]  L. Douglas James,et al.  Economics of water resources planning , 1971 .

[3]  Arthur V. Brown,et al.  The Role of Disturbance in Stream Ecology , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[4]  N. Poff,et al.  Physical habitat template of lotic systems: Recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatiotemporal heterogeneity , 1990 .

[5]  T. Brown,et al.  Instream Flow Protection: Seeking A Balance In Western Water Use , 1997 .

[6]  R. Adams,et al.  Benefits of increased streamflow: The case of the John Day River Steelhead Fishery , 1988 .

[7]  John M. Bartholow,et al.  A salmonid population model with emphasis on habitat limitations , 1993 .

[8]  K. Bovee,et al.  IMPORTANCE OF THE TEMPORAL ASPECTS OF HABITAT HYDRAULICS TO FISH POPULATION STUDIES , 1996 .

[9]  David A. Harpman,et al.  A methodology for quantifying and valuing the impacts of flow changes on a fishery , 1993 .

[10]  S. Weisberg,et al.  Effects of Flow Alteration on Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities below the Brighton Hydroelectric Dam , 1991 .

[11]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Implications of Streamflow Variability and Predictability for Lotic Community Structure: A Regional Analysis of Streamflow Patterns , 1989 .

[12]  Jack A. Taylor,et al.  Evaluation of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Field Users , 1991 .

[13]  T. F. Glover,et al.  Water Markets In Theory And Practice: Market Transfers, Water Values, And Public Policy , 1987 .

[14]  D. Walling,et al.  Complex summer water temperature behaviour below a UK regulating reservoir , 1997 .

[15]  Robert A. Young,et al.  Recreational Demands for Maintaining Instream Flows: A Contingent Valuation Approach , 1981 .

[16]  J. Cooper.  Economic Benefits of Instream Flow to Fisheries: A Case Study of California's Feather River , 1990 .

[17]  K. Cheng,et al.  Generation of Synthetic and Missing Climatic Data for Puerto Rico , 1989 .

[18]  H. Landis Gabel,et al.  Principles of Environmental and Resource Economics: A Guide for Students and Decision-Makers , 1995 .

[19]  Thomas C. Brown,et al.  Recreation benefits of instream flow: Application to Montana's Big Hole and Bitterroot Rivers , 1992 .