PB: A Message Transmission Method Based on Area Layer Division in UAV Networks

A search and rescue mission is a typical UAV network application scenario. In this case, it is necessary to deliver messages quickly and efficiently to the ground station through mutual cooperation between UAVs. Many methods used in this case have problems such as unbalanced popularity (the ratio of the relayed message number to the total message number) of nodes, large proportion of ping-pong effect, and long delay. In view of the above problems, this paper proposes a method named PB (Popularity Balance Method for UAVs in the same area layer) based on division of the whole search area. The method divides the search area into multiple area layers. Message transmission between area layers adopts a geographical routing manner, that is, messages are transmitted to the area layer closer to the ground station. The division of the search area changes the pattern of message transmission. Messages are delivered to the area layer closer to the destination node rather than the node closer to the destination. The pattern causes messages’ passing direction to be replaced by “point-to-point closer” to “point-to-face closer.” On the basis of message transmission at area layers, reasonable planning of UAVs’ distribution can effectively improve the network performance deterioration caused by a “hot spot.” Both analysis and experiments show that PB is superior to some existing methods in popularity balance of nodes and ping-pong effect. In addition, experiments also show that it gets better results in targets of delay, delivery rate, and hop count.

[1]  Sofie Pollin,et al.  Micro aerial vehicle networks: an experimental analysis of challenges and opportunities , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Mario Gerla,et al.  GeoDTN+Nav: A Hybrid Geographic and DTN Routing with Navigation Assistance in Urban Vehicular Networks , 2008 .

[3]  Karin Anna Hummel,et al.  Route or Carry: Motion-Driven Packet Forwarding in Micro Aerial Vehicle Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[4]  Danda B. Rawat,et al.  EA-Epidemic : An Energy Aware Epidemic-Based Routing Protocol for Delay Tolerant Networks , 2017 .

[5]  Khaldoun Al Agha,et al.  QOLSR, QoS routing for ad hoc wireless networks using OLSR , 2005, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[6]  Rahul Jain,et al.  Geographical routing using partial information for wireless ad hoc networks , 2001, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[7]  Karin Anna Hummel,et al.  UAV networks in rescue missions , 2013, WiNTECH '13.

[8]  Walid Saad,et al.  Wireless communications, networking, and positioning with unmanned aerial vehicles [Guest Editorial] , 2016, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[9]  Bernhard Rinner,et al.  An Autonomous Multi-UAV System for Search and Rescue , 2015, DroNet@MobiSys.

[10]  Paul Thompson,et al.  System Development and Demonstration of a Cooperative UAV Team for Mapping and Tracking , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[11]  Liu Yang,et al.  A Game Theoretic Approach for Balancing Energy Consumption in Clustered Wireless Sensor Networks , 2017, Sensors.

[12]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones , 2015, Nature.

[13]  Evsen Yanmaz,et al.  Trajectory-aware Ad hoc Routing Protocol for Micro Aerial Vehicle Networks , 2014 .

[14]  Ozgur Koray Sahingoz,et al.  Networking Models in Flying Ad-Hoc Networks (FANETs): Concepts and Challenges , 2013, Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems.

[15]  Karin Anna Hummel,et al.  Routing in a fleet of micro aerial vehicles: first experimental insights , 2014, AIRBORNE '14.

[16]  Wei Wayne Li,et al.  Multipath multihop routing analysis in mobile ad hoc networks , 2010, Wirel. Networks.

[17]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Implementation of a wireless mesh network of ultra light MAVs with dynamic routing , 2012, 2012 IEEE Globecom Workshops.

[18]  F. Barrero,et al.  An Intelligent Strategy for Tactical Movements of UAVs in Disaster Scenarios , 2016, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[19]  Danda B. Rawat,et al.  Performance evaluation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle ad hoc networks , 2015, SoutheastCon 2015.

[20]  Rostam Shirani,et al.  Quadratic Estimation of Success Probability of Greedy Geographic Forwarding in Unmanned Aeronautical Ad-Hoc Networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE 75th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[21]  Abdul Jabbar,et al.  Protocols for highly-dynamic airborne networks , 2012, Mobicom '12.

[22]  Rajesh Kumar,et al.  A Cooperative Network Framework for Multi-UAV Guided Ground Ad Hoc Networks , 2015, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[23]  Arun Venkataramani,et al.  R3: robust replication routing in wireless networks with diverse connectivity characteristics , 2011, MobiCom '11.

[24]  Stephen Farrell,et al.  DTN: an architectural retrospective , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[25]  Ilker Bekmezci,et al.  Flying Ad-Hoc Networks (FANETs): A survey , 2013, Ad Hoc Networks.

[26]  Bernhard Rinner,et al.  Drone networks: Communications, coordination, and sensing , 2018, Ad Hoc Networks.

[27]  Lav Gupta,et al.  Survey of Important Issues in UAV Communication Networks , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[28]  Qingqing Wu,et al.  Joint Trajectory and Communication Design for Multi-UAV Enabled Wireless Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[29]  Yi Zhou,et al.  Multi-UAV-Aided Networks: Aerial-Ground Cooperative Vehicular Networking Architecture , 2015, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[30]  Bill Canis Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS): Commercial Outlook for a New Industry , 2015 .