VoIP Diffusion among New Entrants: A Path Dependent Process

The path dependency literature provides insights on the dynamic allocation processes in which events are non-ergodic and have multiple absorbing states. Technological change belongs to this class of processes. This paper contributes to this conceptual framework by analysing the distinction between path and past dependence. The aim is to investigate how firms implement new innovations in localized technological changes. This conceptual framework is developed to present a longitudinal case study describing the history of VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) diffusion using data triangulation. From the empirical findings, it emerges that new entrants have applied the technology with creativity, following a path dependent process, offering free voice communication, while incumbents have applied the technology within a past dependent pattern and thus the benefits to their customers have been reduced and delayed.

[1]  Richard K. Blundel.  ‘Little Ships’: The Co‐evolution of Technological Capabilities and Industrial Dynamics in Competing Innovation Networks , 2006 .

[2]  D. North.  Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[3]  R. Cowan,et al.  Sprayed to Death: Path Dependence, Lock-in and Pest Control Strategies , 1996 .

[4]  Alain Rallet,et al.  Nouvelle économie et commerce électronique: mesure et démesure , 2003, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[5]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The Evolution of New Industries and the Determinants of Market Structure , 1990 .

[6]  A. Atkinson,et al.  A New View of Technological Change , 1969 .

[7]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Exploring the black box: Telecommunications: complex, uncertain, and path dependent , 1994 .

[8]  L. Dibiaggio.  Design complexity, vertical disintegration and knowledge organization in the semiconductor industry , 2007 .

[9]  E. Penrose,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[10]  George Strauss,et al.  Tracking the Giant Corporation@@@Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. , 1991 .

[11]  P. David.  Path dependence: a foundational concept for historical social science , 2007 .

[12]  Maureen McKelvey,et al.  What are Innovative Opportunities? , 2007 .

[13]  Bo Carlsson,et al.  The Digital Economy: what is new and what is not? , 2004 .

[14]  Dominique Foray,et al.  The dynamic implications of increasing returns: Technological change and path dependent inefficiency , 1997 .

[15]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[16]  N. Rosenberg.  Schumpeter and the Endogeneity of Technology: Some American Perspectives , 2000 .

[17]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[18]  P. Klemperer.  Competition when Consumers have Switching Costs: An Overview with Applications to Industrial Organization, Macroeconomics, and International Trade , 1992 .

[19]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  The economics of path-dependence in industrial organization , 1997 .

[20]  Davide Consoli,et al.  The Dynamics of Technological Change in UK Retail Banking Services: An Evolutionary Perspective , 2005 .

[21]  Jaber F. Gubrium,et al.  Introduction: inside qualitative research , 2002 .

[22]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[23]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[24]  Ulrich Witt,et al.  "Lock-in" vs. "critical masses" -- Industrial change under network externalities , 1997 .

[25]  C. Antonelli.  Path Dependence, Localised Technological Change and the Quest for Dynamic Efficiency , 2006 .

[26]  Douglas Sicker,et al.  Leveraging the EU regulatory framework to improve a layered policy model for US telecommunications markets , 2006 .

[27]  S. Brouse.  Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction, 2nd edition by David Silverman. Sage, London, 2001, 325 pages, £17·99, ISBN 0 761 96865 2. , 2002 .

[28]  Japan's computer and communications industry. The evolution of industrial giants and global competitiveness: by Martin Fransmann Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995, 540 pp. £30.00 , 1996 .

[29]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Industrial Dynamics and the Evolution of Firms' and Nations' Competitive Capabilities in the World Computer Industry , 1997 .

[30]  P. David,et al.  Technical choice innovation and economic growth , 1975 .

[31]  Jackie Krafft,et al.  Vertical structure of the industry and competition: an analysis of the evolution of the info-communications industry , 2003 .

[32]  Tommaso M. Valletti,et al.  Competition in telecommunications: an introduction , 2004, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[33]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[34]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[35]  John Metcalfe,et al.  Evolutionary Economics and Technology Policy , 1994 .

[36]  C. Antonelli.  Models of knowledge and systems of governance , 2005, Journal of Institutional Economics.

[37]  Richard A. Cawley.  Internet, lies and telephony , 1997 .

[38]  D. Silverman.  Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[39]  Mats Magnusson,et al.  What are innovation opportunities , 2004 .

[40]  M. Einhorn.  Internet Voice, ‘Cyberbypass’, Competitive Efficiency , 1996 .

[41]  A. Davies.  Innovation in Large Technical Systems: The Case of Telecommunications , 1996 .

[42]  C. Freeman.  Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[43]  Edwin Blake,et al.  VoIP deregulation in South Africa: Implications for underserviced areas , 2006 .

[44]  C. A. Benavides-Velasco,et al.  Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification , 2008 .

[45]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .

[46]  Vernon W. Ruttan,et al.  INDUCED INNOVATION, EVOLUTIONARY THEORY AND PATH DEPENDENCE: SOURCES OF TECHNICAL CHANGE* , 1997 .

[47]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[48]  S. Laestadius.  The relevance of science and technology indicators: the case of pulp and paper , 1998 .

[49]  R. Cowan,et al.  Sprayed to Death: Pest Control Strategies and Technological Lock-In , 1994 .

[50]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Sources of Industrial Leadership , 1999 .

[51]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  Localized Technological Change in the Network of Networks: the Interaction between Regulation and the Evolution of Technology in Telecommunications , 1995 .

[52]  H. Tikkanen,et al.  Changing sources of competitive advantage: cognition and path dependence in the Finnish retail industry 1945–1995 , 2006 .

[53]  David H. Helman,et al.  Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge , 1989 .

[54]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Neoclassical vs. Evolutionary Theories of Economic Growth: Critique and Prospectus , 1974 .

[55]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[56]  Ioanna D. Constantiou,et al.  Economic factors and diffusion of IP telephony: Empirical evidence from an advanced market , 2008 .

[57]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development: Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111–125 (Summer 1992) , 1992 .

[58]  P. David.  Path Dependence, its Critics, and the Quest for ‘Historical Economics’ , 2005 .

[59]  S. Winter,et al.  Evolutionary theorizing in economics , 2002 .

[60]  M. Meeus,et al.  Firm behaviour and innovative performance: An empirical exploration of the selection–adaptation debate , 2000 .

[61]  K Aoki,et al.  Convergence and new regulatory frameworks: A comparative study of regulatory approaches to Internet telephony , 1998 .

[62]  K. Pavitt,et al.  The technological competencies of the world''s largest firms , 1997 .

[63]  Paul A. David,et al.  The Beginnings and Prospective Ending of “End-to-End” , 2001 .

[64]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  The Business Governance of Localized Knowledge: An Information Economics Approach for the Economics of Knowledge , 2006 .

[65]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Is the Internet a US invention?—an economic and technological history of computer networking , 2002 .

[66]  Nicoletta Corrocher,et al.  The diffusion of Internet telephony among consumers and firms , 2003 .

[67]  Martin Fransman,et al.  Mapping the evolving telecoms industry: the uses and shortcomings of the layer model , 2002 .

[68]  L. McKnight,et al.  Internet Telephony: Effects on the Universal Service Program in the United States , 2005 .

[69]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[70]  C. Seale.  Qualitative research practice , 2004 .

[71]  Peter Galvin,et al.  The Changing Technological Profile of the Leading ICT Firms: Evidence from US Patent Data, 1981-2000 , 2004 .

[72]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[73]  Peter Galvin,et al.  MODULARITY ON INDUSTRY STRUCTURE: THE CASE OF THE WORLD THE EFFECT OF PRODUCT BICYCLE INDUSTRY , 2001 .