Patterns of Interactive Learning in a High-tech Region

This paper aims at developing a theoretical framework that explains levels of interactive learning. Interactive learning is defined as the exchange and sharing of knowledge resources conducive to innovation between an innovator firm, its suppliers, and/or its customers. Our research question is: Why do levels of interactive learning of innovator firms, their customers, and/or suppliers vary? Our theoretical framework combines a resource-based perspective with an activity-based account of interactive learning. It starts with a resource-based argument, which is specified by introducing competing and complementary theoretical arguments such as the complexity and structuring of innovative activities, and sectoral technological dynamics. The strength of internal knowledge resources can either hamper or facilitate levels of interactive learning. We assume that more complex innovative activities urge firms to co-ordinate and exchange information between users and producers, which implies a higher level of interactive learning. The structuring of innovative activities, as well as sectoral technological dynamics can foster interactive learning. To test our theoretical claims, we estimated six models predicting the level of interactive learning of innovator firms with: (1) their customers (here the innovating firms are the producers); (2) their suppliers (here the innovating firms are the customers); (3) with customers and suppliers split by size (four separate models). These analyses allow a comparison of the antecedents of interactive learning of innovator firms performing dual roles, and having a different size. Both monotonic and non-monotonic effects of the complexity of innovative activities, the strength of the internal knowledge base, and monotonic effects of the structuring of innovative activities are tested. Our findings suggest that our theoretical model best fits the interactive learning of small- and medium-sized innovator firms. Interactive learning with customers is positively associated with the complexity and structuring of innovative activities, and with moderate scores of the cross-product term of `complexity of innovative activities and the strength of knowledge resources'. Interactive learning with customers is positively affected by higher technological dynamics. Stronger internal knowledge resources yield positive effects on interactive learning with suppliers up to a threshold point. Once this threshold is crossed, the effects of stronger knowledge resources become negative. Interactive learning with suppliers as well as with customers is positively associated with internal and external structuring of innovative activities, but is not affected by sectoral technological dynamics.

[1]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[2]  James G. Combs,et al.  Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics , 1999 .

[3]  John T. Scott,et al.  Market Structure and Technological Change , 1987 .

[4]  R. Gulati Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis , 1995 .

[5]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Empirical studies of innovation and market structure , 1989 .

[6]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[7]  W. Evan Organization Theory: Research and Design , 1993 .

[8]  G. Becker,et al.  A Theory of Social Interactions , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  E. Hippel Cooperation between Rivals: Informal Know-How Trading , 1987 .

[10]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[11]  Amalya L. Oliver,et al.  Networking Network Studies: An Analysis of Conceptual Configurations in the Study of Inter-organizational Relationships , 1998 .

[12]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Using academic technology: Transfer methods and licensing incidence in the commercialization of American diagnostic imaging equipment research, 1954-1988 , 1991 .

[13]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[14]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[15]  Roel Rutten,et al.  Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Growth: The Theory and Practice of Learning Regions , 2001 .

[16]  David J. Teece,et al.  Technology, Organization, and Competitiveness: Perspectives on Industrial and Corporate Change , 1998 .

[17]  H. Simon Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[18]  E. Hippel The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process , 1993 .

[19]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[20]  R. Grant Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[21]  David F. Midgley,et al.  The effect of network structure in industrial diffusion processes , 1992 .

[22]  G. Pisano The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[23]  P. Windrum,et al.  Simulation Models of Technological Innovation , 1999 .

[24]  R. Walker,et al.  Simulation models , 1999 .

[25]  Christopher Freeman,et al.  Technology and the wealth of nations : the dynamics of constructed advantage , 1993 .

[26]  E. Andersen,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[27]  Rod Coombs,et al.  Technological collaboration : the dynamics of cooperation in industrial innovation , 1996 .

[28]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[29]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[30]  A. Gambardella Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s * , 1992 .

[31]  R. Duncan Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. , 1972 .

[32]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation , 2000 .

[33]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Firm Size and Participation in R&D , 1996 .

[34]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  Why do firms cooperate on R&D? an empirical study , 1992 .

[35]  D. Dougherty Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[36]  P. Cooke,et al.  The governance of innovation in Europe : regional perspectives on global competitiveness , 2000 .

[37]  M. Aiken,et al.  Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. , 1968 .

[38]  Philip Cooke,et al.  The governance of innovation in Europe , 2000 .

[39]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[40]  Jerald Hage,et al.  Sectoral Patterns of Interactive Learning: An Empirical Exploration of a Case in a Dutch Region , 2001, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[41]  S. Borgatti,et al.  A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms , 1997 .

[42]  J. Hage,et al.  A Typology of Interorganizational Relationships and Networks , 1997 .

[43]  Danny Miller,et al.  SOURCES AND CONSEQUENCES OF COMPETITIVE INERTIA: A STUDY OF THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY. , 1994 .

[44]  Jan Fagerberg,et al.  User-Producer Interaction, Learning and Comparative Advantage , 1993 .

[45]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[46]  Morris Teubal,et al.  Paradigmatic Shifts in National Innovation Systems , 1997 .

[47]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Technological Discontinuties, Organizational Capabilities, and Strategic Commitments , 1994 .

[48]  Håkan Håkansson,et al.  Industrial technological development : a network approach , 1987 .

[49]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum , 1982 .

[50]  A. Lin Knowledge Assets: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy , 2001 .

[51]  L. Oerlemans,et al.  Economic network research: a methodological state of the art , 1993 .

[52]  A. Grandori An Organizational Assessment of Interfirm Coordination Modes , 1997 .

[53]  Morris Teubal,et al.  On User Needs and Need Determination: Aspects of the Theory of Technological Innovation , 1979 .

[54]  J. Turner A theory of social interaction , 1988 .

[55]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .

[56]  O. Persson,et al.  Communication within a national R&D-system: A study of iron and steel in Sweden , 1987 .

[57]  John Hagedoorn,et al.  Leading companies and networks of strategic alliances in information technologies , 1992 .

[58]  Leon A.G. Oerlemans,et al.  Do networks matter for innovation? The usefulness of the network approach in analysing innovation , 1998 .

[59]  Keith Smith,et al.  Interactions in knowledge systems: Foundations, policy implications and empirical methods , 1994 .

[60]  C. Oliver,et al.  Organizations Working Together , 1992 .

[61]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[62]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  University-industry relationships: How does the Belgian academic community feel about it?☆ , 1990 .

[63]  Eugene F. Stone,et al.  "Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables": Correction to Stone and Hollenbeck (1989). , 1990 .

[64]  Alice Lam Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures , 1997 .

[65]  Bjørn Johnson,et al.  Learning Economies, Innovation Systems and European Integration , 1997 .

[66]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[67]  K. Pavitt Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[68]  Beverly B. Tyler,et al.  Evaluating technological collaborative opportunities: A cognitive modeling perspective , 1995 .

[69]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[70]  C. Edquist Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[71]  Joseph Galaskiewicz,et al.  Interorganizational relations : implications for community development , 1985 .

[72]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[73]  M Lee,et al.  The economics of innovation. , 1968, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[74]  K. Green National innovation systems: a comparative analysis , 1996 .

[75]  Leon A.G. Oerlemans,et al.  The competitiveness of firms in the region of North Brabant , 1995 .

[76]  M. Dodgson Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures , 1993 .

[77]  B. Lundvall Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction , 1985 .

[78]  R Dewar,et al.  Size, technology, complexity, and structural differentiation: toward a theoretical synthesis. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[79]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  Determinants of innovation : the message from new indicators , 1996 .

[80]  R. Stough,et al.  Learning and Learning Capability in the Fordist and Post-Fordist Age: An Integrative Framework , 1998 .