Adaptive Power Controlled Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks

Energy efficiency and mobility robustness are two of the main performance metrics to be addressed when designing any routing protocol for underwater sensor network (UWSN). Energy efficiency leads to a prolonged network life time, while mobility robustness ensures high and stable delivery ratio. Most of the routing strategies designed for UWSN require a full knowledge of the three dimensional location of nodes. In this paper, we introduce an energy efficient routing schema that does not require any location information, and achieves high packet delivery ratio for both static and mobile scenarios in sparse or dense networks. In our routing strategy, nodes assign themselves to concentric layers. A node to layer assignment is determined by signal power of a received interest packet broadcast by sink nodes. Routing paths are determined on the fly, and a forwarder is chosen based on its layer number and residual energy. Nodes are assumed to be able to adjust their transmission power to a finite set of values. Low power level is most likely selected by nodes when the network is dense, whereas a higher power level is selected when the network is sparse or when nodes at layers closer to the sink has more residual energy. Simulation results shows that our routing protocol achieves a high delivery ratio and a low energy consumption while reducing the delay when compared with other routing strategies for both sparse and dense networks.

[1]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  On Joint Frequency and Power Allocation in a Cross-Layer Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Networks , 2010 .

[2]  Amitabha Das NETWORKING 2008, Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks, Wireless Networks, Next Generation Internet , 7th International IFIP-TC6 Networking Conference, Singapore, May 5-9, 2008, Proceedings , 2008, Networking.

[3]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  On the Design of Energy-efficient Routing Protocols in Underwater Networks , 2007, 2007 4th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks.

[4]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Focused beam routing protocol for underwater acoustic networks , 2008, Underwater Networks.

[5]  Jun-Hong Cui,et al.  DBR: Depth-Based Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2008, Networking.

[6]  S. Singh,et al.  The WHOI micro-modem: an acoustic communications and navigation system for multiple platforms , 2005, Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE.

[7]  Willis F. Kern,et al.  Solid mensuration : with proofs , 1938 .

[8]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  On the Relationship between Transmission Power and Capacity of an Underwater Acoustic Communication Channel , 2008, OCEANS 2008 - MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Ocean.

[9]  Li De-shi A Routing Protocol Based on Underwater Acoustic Channel , 2009 .

[10]  Uday B. Desai,et al.  PULRP: Path Unaware Layered Routing Protocol for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[11]  Shengli Zhou,et al.  Aqua-Sim: An NS-2 based simulator for underwater sensor networks , 2009, OCEANS 2009.

[12]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Energy-Efficient Routing Schemes for Underwater Acoustic Networks , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[13]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Challenges for efficient communication in underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2004, SIGBED.

[14]  Peng Xie,et al.  VBF: Vector-Based Forwarding Protocol for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2006, Networking.

[15]  Jiejun Kong,et al.  The challenges of building mobile underwater wireless networks for aquatic applications , 2006, IEEE Network.