The Effect of Knowledge Management Context on Knowledge Management Practices: an Empirical Investigation

This paper presents recent research findings on the effects of organizational knowledge management (KM) context on KM practices. Data were collected at a large Canadian law firm via a Web-based survey instrument from over 400 participants comprising professional and support staff working in various office locations. The purpose of the study was to gain insight on the antecedents of knowledge management behaviors in organizations. A theoretical model explicating the impact of an organization’s KM environment on both organizational and individual KM behaviors was developed and tested using structural equation modeling techniques. The moderating effects of age, biological sex, job category, and years spent in the organization were also examined. Results indicate that an organization’s knowledge management environment impacts on both organizational as well as personal knowledge management behaviors. Furthermore, we show that organizational KM behavior also influences personal KM behavior, thus acting as a mediator between the overarching organizational knowledge management policies and practices and the employees’ individual practices. Based on this empirical evidence, recommendations are suggested for organizations wishing to institutionalize knowledge management initiatives in their firms.

[1]  Marzena Cedzynski,et al.  Partial Least Squares: a Critical Review and a Potential Alternative , 2005 .

[2]  Brian Detlor.  Towards Knowledge Portals: From Human Issues to Intelligent Agents , 2004 .

[3]  Jagdip Singh,et al.  Tackling measurement problems with Item Response Theory: Principles, characteristics, and assessment, with an illustrative example , 2004 .

[4]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  David C. Blair,et al.  Knowledge management: Hype, hope, or help? , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Ganesh D. Bhatt,et al.  Management strategies for individual knowledge and organizational knowledge , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  Suliman Al-Hawamdeh,et al.  Knowledge management: re-thinking information management and facing the challenge of managing tacit knowledge , 2002, Inf. Res..

[8]  Kathleen Shearer,et al.  Understanding knowledge management and information management: the need for an empirical perspective , 2002, Inf. Res..

[9]  K. Bollen.  Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  Roger S. White,et al.  Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know , 2001 .

[11]  Roy J. Byrd,et al.  Knowledge portals and the emerging digital knowledge workplace , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[12]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Making the Invisible Visible: How Companies Win with the Right Information, People and IT , 2001 .

[13]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Information Orientation: The Link to Business Performance , 2001 .

[14]  Howard Rosenbaum,et al.  The information environment of electronic commerce: information imperatives for the firm , 2000, J. Inf. Sci..

[15]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  T. Brooks.  Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart , 1999 .

[17]  H. Rosenbaum.  Towards a Theory of the Digital Information Environment. , 1999 .

[18]  George A. Marcoulides,et al.  Modern methods for business research , 1998 .

[19]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[20]  W. Saffady.  Knowledge management : a manager's briefing , 1998 .

[21]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Information Ecology: Mastering the Information and Knowledge Environment , 1997 .

[22]  J. Tacq.  Multivariate Analysis Techniques in Social Science Research: From Problem to Analysis , 1997 .

[23]  J. Fox.  Applied Regression Analysis, Linear Models, and Related Methods , 1997 .

[24]  Howard Rosenbaum,et al.  Managers and information in organizations : towards a structurational concept of the information use environment of managers , 1997 .

[25]  Timothy R. Hinkin.  A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations , 1995 .

[26]  Steven Kerr,et al.  Creating the boundaryless organization: The radical reconstruction of organization capabilities , 1995 .

[27]  Howard Rosenbaum,et al.  Information Use Environments and Structuration: Towards an Integration of Taylor and Giddens. , 1993 .

[28]  Jeffrey Katzer,et al.  The information environment of managers , 1992 .

[29]  Elazar J. Pedhazur,et al.  Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[30]  Robert S. Taylor,et al.  Information use environments. , 1991 .

[31]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[32]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[33]  D. E. Patterson,et al.  Crossvalidation, Bootstrapping, and Partial Least Squares Compared with Multiple Regression in Conventional QSAR Studies , 1988 .

[34]  R. Daft,et al.  The information environments of organizations , 1987 .

[35]  Robert S. Taylor,et al.  Value-Added Processes in Information Systems , 1987 .

[36]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[37]  N. Roberts,et al.  Value-added processes in information systems , 1986 .

[38]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[39]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .