Analysis of effectiveness of R1-nj anthocyanin marker for in vivo haploid identification in maize and molecular markers for predicting the inhibition of R1-nj expression

Key messageR1-nj anthocyanin marker inhibition is highly frequent in tropical maize germplasm considerably affecting efficiency of haploid identification. Molecular markers reliably differentiating germplasm with anthocyanin color inhibitor have been identified in this study.AbstractThe R1-Navajo (R1-nj) color marker facilitates easy and quick identification of haploid kernels at the seed stage during in vivo haploid induction process in maize. However, the Navajo phenotype can be completely suppressed or poorly expressed in some germplasm, making it impossible or inefficient to identify haploids at the seed stage. In this study, we characterized the expression of R1-nj marker in a large array of tropical/subtropical inbred lines, breeding populations and landraces by crossing with the R1-nj-based tropicalized haploid inducer. There was a high frequency of inhibition of the Navajo phenotype in the maize inbred lines, which are used in tropical breeding programs. Genome-wide association mapping showed that the C1 anthocyanin regulatory locus is the most significant genetic factor influencing inhibition of the Navajo phenotype. Molecular marker assays were designed based on polymorphism in the C1 vs C1-I alleles. Analysis of a set of 714 inbred lines demonstrated that a combination of two gene-specific markers—8 bp C1-I InDel and C1-I SNP—could predict with high accuracy the presence of anthocyanin color inhibition in the germplasm analyzed. Information generated in this study aids in making informed decisions on the constitution of source populations for doubled haploid (DH) line development in tropical germplasm, particularly those derived from elite maize lines from CIMMYT. The C1-I gene-specific molecular markers identified and validated will facilitate high-throughput and cost-effective evaluation of a large pool of germplasm for the presence of the dominant color inhibitor in maize germplasm.

[1]  W. Jin,et al.  Morphological and molecular evidences for DNA introgression in haploid induction via a high oil inducer CAUHOI in maize , 2009, Planta.

[2]  H. Saedler,et al.  The duplicated chalcone synthase genes C2 and Whp (white pollen) of Zea mays are independently regulated; evidence for translational control of Whp expression by the anthocyanin intensifying gene in. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[3]  S. S. Chase,et al.  An Embryo Marker for Detecting Monoploids Of Maize (Zea Mays L.)1 , 1966 .

[4]  A. Melchinger,et al.  Development of in vivo haploid inducers for tropical maize breeding programs , 2012, Euphytica.

[5]  M. Warburton.  Laboratory Protocols CIMMYT Applied Molecular Genetics Laboratory , 2005 .

[6]  John Doebley,et al.  Maize association population: a high-resolution platform for quantitative trait locus dissection. , 2005, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[7]  G. Dicu,et al.  New inducers of maternal haploids in maize. , 2010 .

[8]  T. Lübberstedt,et al.  Application of doubled haploids for target gene fixation in backcross programmes of maize , 2012 .

[9]  Albrecht E. Melchinger,et al.  Effect of source germplasm and season on the in vivo haploid induction rate in tropical maize , 2011, Euphytica.

[10]  Albrecht E. Melchinger,et al.  Rapid and accurate identification of in vivo-induced haploid seeds based on oil content in maize , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[11]  I. Greenblatt,et al.  A Commercially Desirable Procedure for Detection of Monoploids in Maize , 1967 .

[12]  Sarah Hake,et al.  Handbook of Maize , 2009 .

[13]  J. Gowen,et al.  Monoploids in maize. , 1952 .

[14]  E. Buckler,et al.  Genetic association mapping and genome organization of maize. , 2006, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[15]  E. Coe.  Spontaneous Mutation of the Aleurone Color Inhibitor in Maize. , 1962, Genetics.

[16]  I. M. Greenblatt,et al.  DIFFUSE, A PATTERN GENE IN ZEA MAYS Epistatic to Red Pericarp , 1954 .

[17]  Hartwig H. Geiger,et al.  In vivo haploid induction in maize - performance of new inducers and significance of doubled haploid lines in hybrid breeding , 2005 .

[18]  D G Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic plots , 1994, BMJ.

[19]  P. Ruckenbauer,et al.  Hybrid maize breeding at KWS Saat AG. , 2004 .

[20]  E. Coe,et al.  White pollen in maize , 1981 .

[21]  B. Burr,et al.  The maize repressor-like gene intensifier1 shares homology with the r1/b1 multigene family of transcription factors and exhibits missplicing. , 1996, The Plant cell.

[22]  R. Jorgensen,et al.  Genetic and developmental control of anthocyanin biosynthesis. , 1991, Annual review of genetics.

[23]  M. Balestre,et al.  Production and identification of doubled haploids in tropical maize. , 2013, Genetics and molecular research : GMR.

[24]  Albrecht E. Melchinger,et al.  In Vivo Haploid Induction in Maize: Identification of Haploid Seeds by Their Oil Content , 2014 .

[25]  B. Burr,et al.  Molecular analysis of the maize anthocyanin regulatory locus C1. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  J. Reif,et al.  Unlocking the Genetic Diversity of Maize Landraces with Doubled Haploids Opens New Avenues for Breeding , 2013, PloS one.

[27]  S. Goff,et al.  Identification of functional domains in the maize transcriptional activator C1: comparison of wild-type and dominant inhibitor proteins. , 1991, Genes & development.

[28]  M. Sachs,et al.  The identification and characterization of two dominant r1 haplotype-specific inhibitors of aleurone color in Zea mays. , 2002, The Journal of heredity.

[29]  M. Ouzunova,et al.  Testcross performance of doubled‐haploid lines developed from European flint maize landraces , 2010 .

[30]  H. Kang,et al.  Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[31]  R. Fisher.  On the Interpretation of χ2 from Contingency Tables, and the Calculation of P , 2010 .

[32]  D. Weber,et al.  Chapter Three – Today's Use of Haploids in Corn Plant Breeding , 2014 .

[33]  Robert J. Elshire,et al.  A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species , 2011, PloS one.

[34]  H. Saedler,et al.  Molecular analysis of the C1‐I allele from Zea mays: a dominant mutant of the regulatory C1 locus. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[35]  S. S. Chase.  Monoploids and monoploid-derivatives of maize (Zea mays L.) , 1969, The Botanical Review.

[36]  Albrecht E. Melchinger,et al.  Doubled Haploids in Tropical Maize: I. Effects of Inducers and Source Germplasm on in vivo Haploid Induction Rates , 2011 .

[37]  Edward H. Coe,et al.  The Genetics of Corn , 1988 .

[38]  Int. Cimmyt.  Laboratory protocols: CIMMYT Applied molecular genetics laboratory , 2005 .

[39]  R. Fisher.  On the Interpretation of χ2 from Contingency Tables, and the Calculation of P , 2018, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society).

[40]  Boddupalli M. Prasanna,et al.  Doubled haploid technology in maize breeding: theory and practice , 2012 .

[41]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values , 1994, BMJ.

[42]  Prasanna Bm,et al.  Doubled haploid (DH) technology in maize breeding: an overview. , 2012 .

[43]  Alisher Touraev,et al.  The resurgence of haploids in higher plants. , 2007, Trends in plant science.

[44]  H. Geiger,et al.  Doubled haploids in hybrid maize breeding. , 2009 .