Measuring the Economic Benefits of Water Quality Improvement with Benefit Transfer: An Introduction for Non-Economists

In this paper we provide an introduction to water quality benefit estimation for non- economists. Net water quality benefits are typically measured using the concept of consumer surplus, which can be estimated using a number of economic valuation methodologies. These can be divided into direct and indirect methods. Direct methods involve questioning survey respondents to determine their consumer surplus. Indirect methods use data from consumer market behavior to estimate economic values. When limited time or funding preclude costly data collection and the development of new consumer surplus estimates, the method of benefit transfer can be used to tailor pre-existing consumer surplus estimates to fit new policy situations. We provide an example of benefit transfer by estimating the value of water quality improvements for the Cape Fear River in North Carolina. Benefit transfer methods are used with three valuation approaches to estimate the benefits of water quality improvement.

[1]  Robert D. Willig,et al.  Consumer's Surplus Without Apology , 1976 .

[2]  Daniel R. Feenberg,et al.  Measuring the benefits of water pollution abatement , 1980 .

[3]  John R. Stoll,et al.  Consumer's Surplus in Commodity Space , 1980 .

[4]  Jon R. Miller.  Disproportionate sampling and recreation demand estimation with the 1980 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. , 1987 .

[5]  Per-Olov Johansson,et al.  The Economic Theory and Measurement of Environmental Benefits , 1987 .

[6]  Y. Kaoru,et al.  Signals or noise , 1988 .

[7]  J J Louviere,et al.  CONJOINT ANALYSIS MODELLING OF STATE OF PREFERENCES. A REVIEW OF THEORY, METHODS, RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND EXTERNAL VALIDITY , 1988 .

[8]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[9]  N. Bockstael,et al.  A Random Utility Model for Sportfishing: Some Preliminary Results for Florida , 1989, Marine Resource Economics.

[10]  V. Kerry Smith,et al.  What have we learned since hotelling's letter?: A meta-analysis , 1990 .

[11]  V. Kerry Smith,et al.  Signals or Noise? Explaining the Variation in Recreation Benefit Estimates , 1990 .

[12]  Robert W Hartman.  One thousand points of light seeking a number: A case study of CBO's search for a discount rate policy , 1990 .

[13]  S. F. Edwards.  A Critique of Three “Economics” Arguments Commonly Used to Influence Fishery Allocations , 1991 .

[14]  John C. Bergstrom,et al.  Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality , 1991 .

[15]  Richard G. Walsh,et al.  Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation demand studies, 1968–1988 , 1992 .

[16]  V. Smith,et al.  On separating defensible benefit transfers from “smoke and mirrors” , 1992 .

[17]  Helen R. Neill,et al.  Benefit Transfers: Conceptual and Empirical Issues , 1992 .

[18]  John B. Loomis,et al.  The Evolution of a More Rigorous Approach to Benefit Transfer: Benefit Function Transfer , 1992 .

[19]  George R. Parsons,et al.  Benefits transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies , 1992 .

[20]  F. Reed Johnson,et al.  Benefits and costs of pulp and paper effluent controls under the Clean Water Act , 1992 .

[21]  V. Kerry Smith,et al.  Hedonic models and air pollution: Twenty-five years and counting , 1993 .

[22]  Mary Jo Kealy,et al.  Benefits Transfer in a Random Utility Model of Recreation , 1994 .

[23]  V. Smith,et al.  Can Markets Value Air Quality? A Meta-Analysis of Hedonic Property Value Models , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Testing Transferability of Recreation Demand Models Across Regions: A Study of Corps of Engineer Reservoirs , 1995 .

[25]  V. Smith,et al.  Do Contingent Valuation Estimates Pass a "Scope" Test? A Meta Analysis , 1996 .

[26]  Daniel L. Rubinfeld,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies : Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public Goods , 1997 .

[27]  Teofilo Ozuna,et al.  Testing the Reliability of the Benefit Function Transfer Approach , 1996 .

[28]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis , 1996 .

[29]  V. Kerry Smith,et al.  Do Contingent Valuation Estimates Pass a "Scope" Test? A Meta-analysis , 1996 .

[30]  A. Boardman,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice , 1996 .

[31]  Bonnie G. Colby,et al.  Evaluating the Performance of Benefit Transfer: An Empirical Inquiry , 1997 .

[32]  N. Bockstael,et al.  EVIDENCE OF THE EFFECTS OF WATER QUALITY ON RESIDENTIAL LAND PRICES , 2000 .

[33]  Roy Brouwer,et al.  The Validity of Environmental Benefits Transfer: Further Empirical Testing , 1999 .

[34]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Benefit Transfer as Preference Calibration , 1999 .

[35]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Using meta‐analysis for benefit transfer: In‐sample convergent validity tests of an outdoor recreation database , 2000 .

[36]  Roy Brouwer,et al.  Environmental value transfer: state of the art and future prospects , 2000 .

[37]  J. Whitehead,et al.  Measuring Recreation Benefits of Quality Improvements with Revealed and Stated Behavior Data , 2000 .

[38]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Testing a meta-analysis model for benefit transfer in international outdoor recreation , 2001 .

[39]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and developing Countries , 2001 .

[40]  Yong-Suhk Wui,et al.  The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis , 2001 .

[41]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Is Meta-Analysis a Noah's Ark for Non-Market Valuation? , 2002 .

[42]  R. Kramer,et al.  Estimating the economic value of water quality protection in the Catawba River basin , 2002 .

[43]  David N. Barton,et al.  The transferability of benefit transfer: contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica , 2002 .

[44]  A COST‐BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF WATER QUALITY PROTECTION IN THE CATAWBA BASIN 1 , 2002 .

[45]  George Van Houtven,et al.  Benefit Transfer via Preference Calibration: “Prudential Algebra” for Policy , 2002, Land Economics.

[46]  Daniel J. Phaneuf,et al.  A random utility model for total maximum daily loads: Estimating the benefits of watershed‐based ambient water quality improvements , 2002 .