Guideline‐Recommended Therapies and Clinical Outcomes According to the Risk for Recurrent Cardiovascular Events After an Acute Coronary Syndrome

Background Patients who have had an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular events; however, paradoxically, high‐risk patients who may derive the greatest benefit from guideline‐recommended therapies are often undertreated. The aim of our study was to examine the management, clinical outcomes, and temporal trends of patients after ACS stratified by the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score for secondary prevention, a recently validated clinical tool that incorporates 9 clinical risk factors. Methods and Results Included were patients with ACS enrolled in the biennial Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Surveys (ACSIS) between 2008 and 2016. Patients were stratified by the TIMI risk score for secondary prevention to low (score 0–1), intermediate (2), or high (≥3) risk. Clinical outcomes included 30‐day major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina, stent thrombosis, urgent revascularization) and 1‐year mortality. Of 6827 ACS patients enrolled, 35% were low risk, 27% were intermediate risk, and 38% were high risk. Compared with the other risk groups, high‐risk patients were older, were more commonly female, and had more renal dysfunction and heart failure (P<0.001 for each). High‐risk patients were treated less commonly with guideline‐recommended therapies during hospitalization (percutaneous coronary intervention) and at discharge (statins, dual‐antiplatelet therapy, cardiac rehabilitation). Overall, high‐risk patients had higher rates of 30‐day major adverse cardiac events (7.2% low, 8.2% intermediate, and 15.1% high risk; P<0.001) and 1‐year mortality (1.9%, 4.6%, and 15.8%, respectively; P<0.001). Over the past decade, utilization of guideline‐recommended therapies has increased among all risk groups; however, the rate of 30‐day major adverse cardiac events has significantly decreased among patients at high risk but not among patients at low and intermediate risk. Similarly, the 1‐year mortality rate has decreased numerically only among high‐risk patients. Conclusions Despite an improvement in the management of high‐risk ACS patients, they are still undertreated with guideline‐recommended therapies. Nevertheless, the outcome of high‐risk patients after ACS has significantly improved in the past decade, thus they should not be denied these therapies.

[1]  H. Bueno,et al.  Optimised care of elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome , 2018, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.

[2]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2018, European heart journal.

[3]  R. Giugliano,et al.  Atherothrombotic Risk Stratification and Ezetimibe for Secondary Prevention. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  Marc P. Bonaca,et al.  Atherothrombotic Risk Stratification and the Efficacy and Safety of Vorapaxar in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease and Previous Myocardial Infarction , 2016, Circulation.

[5]  Jackson T. Wright,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Improve-It Investigators Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes , 2015 .

[7]  R. Taylor,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation for people with heart disease: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. , 2014, International journal of cardiology.

[8]  D. Zahger,et al.  Contemporary use and outcome of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with acute coronary syndromes: insights from the 2010 ACSIS and ACSIS-PCI surveys. , 2012, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[9]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2011, European heart journal.

[10]  R. Kornowski The ACSIS Registry and primary angioplasty following coronary bypass surgery , 2011, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[11]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Dose comparisons of clopidogrel and aspirin in acute coronary syndromes. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  David A Morrow,et al.  Risk Prediction in Cardiovascular Medicine Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in Patients With Stable and Unstable Coronary Heart Disease , 2010 .

[13]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Association of Diet, Exercise, and Smoking Modification With Risk of Early Cardiovascular Events After Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2010, Circulation.

[14]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Cardiovascular ischemic event rates in outpatients with symptomatic atherothrombosis or risk factors in the united states: insights from the REACH Registry. , 2009, Critical pathways in cardiology.

[15]  R. Collins,et al.  Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. , 2009, Lancet.

[16]  K. Eagle,et al.  Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE) , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  Christopher P Cannon,et al.  Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  K. Eagle,et al.  Impact of Combination Evidence-Based Medical Therapy on Mortality in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2004, Circulation.

[19]  Karl Swedberg,et al.  Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  B. Pitt,et al.  Eplerenone, a Selective Aldosterone Blocker, in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction after Myocardial Infarction , 2003 .

[21]  H. Dargie,et al.  Effect of carvedilol on outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction: the CAPRICORN randomised trial , 2001, The Lancet.

[22]  E. Antman,et al.  TIMI Risk Score for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Convenient, Bedside, Clinical Score for Risk Assessment at Presentation: An Intravenous nPA for Treatment of Infarcting Myocardium Early II Trial Substudy , 2000, Circulation.

[23]  CIBIS-II Investigators and Committees The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II): a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[24]  E. J. Brown,et al.  Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. The SAVE Investigators. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  C. Escobar Cervantes,et al.  [A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood pressure control]. , 2016, Semergen.

[26]  R. Califf,et al.  Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.