Is this Question Real? Dataset Collection on Perceived Intentions and Implicit Attack Detection

The proliferation of social media and online communication platforms has made social interactions more accessible, leading to a significant expansion of research into language use with a particular focus on toxic behavior and hate speech. Few studies, however, have focused on the tacit information that may imply a negative intention and the perspective that impacts the interpretation of such intention. Conversation is a joint activity that relies on coordination between what one party expresses and how the other party construes what has been expressed. Thus, how a message is perceived becomes equally important regardless of whether the sent message includes any form of explicit attack or offense. This study focuses on identifying the implicit attacks and negative intentions in text-based conversation from the reader’s point of view. We focus on questions in conversations and investigate the underlying perceived intention. We introduce our dataset that includes questions, intention polarity, and type of attacks. We conduct a meta-analysis on the data to demonstrate how a question may be used as a means of attack and how different perspectives can lead to multiple interpretations. We also report benchmark results of several models for detecting instances of tacit attacks in questions with the aim of avoiding latent or manifest conflict in conversations.

[1]  Suma Bhat,et al.  Abusive Language Detection in Heterogeneous Contexts: Dataset Collection and the Role of Supervised Attention , 2021, AAAI.

[2]  Dumitru-Clementin Cercel,et al.  UPB at SemEval-2020 Task 12: Multilingual Offensive Language Detection on Social Media by Fine-tuning a Variety of BERT-based Models , 2020, SEMEVAL.

[3]  Viviana Patti,et al.  Resources and benchmark corpora for hate speech detection: a systematic review , 2020, Language Resources and Evaluation.

[4]  Cristiano André da Costa,et al.  Intelligent personal assistants: A systematic literature review , 2020, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  Tommaso Caselli,et al.  I Feel Offended, Don’t Be Abusive! Implicit/Explicit Messages in Offensive and Abusive Language , 2020, LREC.

[6]  Justin Cheng,et al.  Don’t Let Me Be Misunderstood:Comparing Intentions and Perceptions in Online Discussions , 2020, WWW.

[7]  Bettina Braun,et al.  The Processing of Prosodic Cues to Rhetorical Question Interpretation: Psycholinguistic and Neurolinguistics Evidence , 2019, INTERSPEECH.

[8]  Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil,et al.  Trouble on the Horizon: Forecasting the Derailment of Online Conversations as they Develop , 2019, EMNLP.

[9]  Omer Levy,et al.  RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach , 2019, ArXiv.

[10]  Ricardo Ribeiro,et al.  Automatic cyberbullying detection: A systematic review , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  Cullen S. Hendrix,et al.  Ethnicity, nonviolent protest, and lethal repression in Africa , 2019, Journal of Peace Research.

[12]  Preslav Nakov,et al.  Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Media , 2019, NAACL.

[13]  Maryam Sadat Mirzaei,et al.  Language learning through conversation envisioning in virtual reality: a sociocultural approach , 2018, Future-proof CALL: language learning as exploration and encounters – short papers from EUROCALL 2018.

[14]  Shivakant Mishra,et al.  International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining ( ASONAM ) Are They Our Brothers ? Analysis and Detection of Religious Hate Speech in the Arabic Twittersphere , 2018 .

[15]  Sérgio Nunes,et al.  A Survey on Automatic Detection of Hate Speech in Text , 2018, ACM Comput. Surv..

[16]  Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil,et al.  Conversations Gone Awry: Detecting Early Signs of Conversational Failure , 2018, ACL.

[17]  Ping Liu,et al.  Forecasting the presence and intensity of hostility on Instagram using linguistic and social features , 2018, ICWSM.

[18]  Dan Mercea,et al.  Parametrizing Brexit: mapping Twitter political space to parliamentary constituencies , 2018 .

[19]  I. Poggi,et al.  Feeling Offended: A Blow to Our Image and Our Social Relationships , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[20]  Shervin Malmasi,et al.  Detecting Hate Speech in Social Media , 2017, RANLP.

[21]  Adrian Hernandez-Mendez,et al.  Evaluating Natural Language Understanding Services for Conversational Question Answering Systems , 2017, SIGDIAL Conference.

[22]  Pascale Fung,et al.  One-step and Two-step Classification for Abusive Language Detection on Twitter , 2017, ALW@ACL.

[23]  Ingmar Weber,et al.  Understanding Abuse: A Typology of Abusive Language Detection Subtasks , 2017, ALW@ACL.

[24]  Ingmar Weber,et al.  Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language , 2017, ICWSM.

[25]  Ellery Wulczyn,et al.  Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scale , 2016, WWW.

[26]  Christian Rauh,et al.  Reading Between the Lines: Prediction of Political Violence Using Newspaper Text , 2016, American Political Science Review.

[27]  Dirk Hovy,et al.  Hateful Symbols or Hateful People? Predictive Features for Hate Speech Detection on Twitter , 2016, NAACL.

[28]  Katharine Gelber,et al.  Evidencing the harms of hate speech , 2016 .

[29]  Joel R. Tetreault,et al.  Abusive Language Detection in Online User Content , 2016, WWW.

[30]  Wojciech Zaremba,et al.  An Empirical Exploration of Recurrent Network Architectures , 2015, ICML.

[31]  Joonsuk Park,et al.  Automatic Identification of Rhetorical Questions , 2015, ACL.

[32]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[33]  H. Wellman Making Minds: How Theory of Mind Develops , 2014 .

[34]  Jeffrey Pennington,et al.  GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation , 2014, EMNLP.

[35]  Fabio Valente,et al.  Predicting Continuous Conflict Perceptionwith Bayesian Gaussian Processes , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[36]  Maciek Lipinski-Harten,et al.  Attitude moderation: A comparison of online chat and face-to-face conversation , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  T. Stivers,et al.  A coding scheme for question-response sequences in conversation , 2010 .

[38]  T. Stivers,et al.  An overview of the question-response system in American English conversation , 2010 .

[39]  A. Galinsky,et al.  Why It Pays to Get Inside the Head of Your Opponent The Differential Effects of Perspective Taking and Empathy in Strategic Interactions , 2022 .

[40]  Andrea Bartoli,et al.  The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice , 2006 .

[41]  D. Winter,et al.  Peace, Conflict, and Violence: Peace Psychology for the 21st Century , 2000 .

[42]  Alice F. Freed The form and function of questions in informal dyadic conversation , 1994 .

[43]  C. K. Grant,et al.  On Using Language , 1956 .

[44]  Ming-Wei Chang,et al.  BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding , 2019, NAACL.

[45]  Torsten Zesch,et al.  Do Women Perceive Hate Differently: Examining the Relationship Between Hate Speech, Gender, and Agreement Judgments , 2018, KONVENS.

[46]  Cristina Bosco,et al.  Hate Speech Annotation: Analysis of an Italian Twitter Corpus , 2017, CLiC-it.

[47]  Suresh Manandhar,et al.  A Chatbot-based Interactive Question Answering System , 2007 .

[48]  Ivano Caponigro,et al.  RHETORICAL QUESTIONS AS QUESTIONS , 2007 .

[49]  C. Creswell CRITICIZING WITH A QUESTION , 1996 .

[50]  Roland Hausser,et al.  Principles of Pragmatics , 1989 .