Validation of single-segment and three-segment spinal models used to represent lumbar flexion.

Changes in spinal posture between the erect and flexed positions were calculated using angular measurements from lateral photographs and radiographs of ten adult male subjects. For photographic measurements, the thoracolumbar vertebral column was modelled as either a single segment or as three segments. In the three-segment model, there was a non-significant correlation between the decrease in lumbar concavity and intervertebral motion. In addition, there was a non-significant negative correlation between the increase in thoracic convexity and lumbar motion determined radiographically. In the single-segment model, the decrease in angulation between the thoracolumbar spine and pelvis was a good representation of lumbar spine flexion as determined by the mean lumbar intervertebral angular change. Therefore, modelling the thoracolumbar vertebral column as a single segment allowed better estimation of lumbar intervertebral angular change during flexion than a three-segment model. The results indicate that large range dynamic motion of the lumbar vertebral column can be represented using photographic analysis of the positions of three easily identified anatomical landmarks: the anterior superior iliac spine, posterior superior iliac spine and the spinous process of the first thoracic vertebra.

[1]  M. Adams,et al.  The Resistance to Flexion of the Lumbar Intervertebral Joint , 1980, Spine.

[2]  K. Klausen,et al.  Lumbar Curve, Trunk Muscles, and Line of Gravity with Different Heel Heights , 1984, Spine.

[3]  W C Hutton,et al.  An electronic inclinometer technique for measuring lumbar curvature. , 1986, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  K. Jacobsen,et al.  Congenital dislocation of the knee. , 1985, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[5]  T Bendix,et al.  Posture of the trunk when sitting on forward inclining seats. , 1983, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  H. V. Skowlund,et al.  Evaluation of mobility of hip and lumbar vertebrae of normal young women. , 1962, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  G. Smidt,et al.  Effect of pelvic tilt on standing posture. , 1984, Physical therapy.

[8]  J D Troup,et al.  Effects on the trunk of erecting pit props at different working heights. , 1966, Ergonomics.

[9]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Basic biomechanics of the spine. , 1980, Neurosurgery.

[10]  J. D. Harris,et al.  THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPES , 1976, The Lancet.

[11]  N D Grew,et al.  A Method of Measuring Human Body Shape and Movement—the ‘Vector Stereograph’ , 1979 .

[12]  T. Beeker,et al.  Recordings of the Movement at the Intervertebral Segment L5-S1: A Technique for the Determination of the Movement in the L5-S1 Spinal Segment by Using Three Specified Postural Positions , 1984, Spine.

[13]  I A Stokes,et al.  Influence of the Hamstring Muscles on Lumbar Spine Curvature in Sitting , 1980, Spine.

[14]  J. J. Keegan,et al.  Alterations of the lumbar curve related to posture and seating. , 1953, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  S. Kumar,et al.  A study of spinal motion during lifting , 1974, Irish journal of medical science.

[16]  W C Hutton,et al.  Has the lumbar spine a margin of safety in forward bending? , 1986, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  M. Pearcy,et al.  Three-Dimensional X-ray Analysis of Normal Movement in the Lumbar Spine , 1984, Spine.

[18]  A. Parker,et al.  Hand positions at possible critical points in the stoop-lift movement. , 1983, Ergonomics.

[19]  A. Parker,et al.  Posture Related to Myoelectric Silence of Erectores Spinae During Trunk Flexion , 1984, Spine.

[20]  M J Pearcy,et al.  Correlation between radiographic and clinical measurement of lumbar spine movement. , 1983, British journal of rheumatology.

[21]  A E Chapman,et al.  Measurements of the sagittal mobility of the lumbar spine and hips. , 1968, Annals of physical medicine.

[22]  D G Wilder,et al.  The Relationship Between Anthropometric, Postural, Muscular, and Mobility Characteristics of Males Ages 18–55 , 1985, Spine.

[23]  M. Fidler,et al.  The effect of four types of support on the segmental mobility of the lumbosacral spine. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  P M Reynolds,et al.  Measurement of spinal mobility: a comparison of three methods. , 1975, Rheumatology and rehabilitation.

[25]  M M Panjabi,et al.  The Basic Kinematics of the Human Spine: A Review of Past and Current Knowledge , 1978, Spine.

[26]  M. Pearcy Stereo radiography of lumbar spine motion. , 1985, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[27]  S D Gertzbein,et al.  Centrode Patterns in the Lumbar Spine: Baseline Studies in Normal Subjects , 1986, Spine.

[28]  M. Flint,et al.  Lumbar Posture: A Study of Roentgenographic Measurement and the Influence of Flexibility and Strength , 1963 .

[29]  Royal,et al.  MOVEMENTS OF THE THORACIC AND LUMBAR SPINE WHEN LIFTING: A CHRONO-CYCLOPHOTOGRAPHIC STUDY. , 1965, Journal of anatomy.