Personal Familiarity Influences the Processing of Upright and Inverted Faces in Infants

Infant face processing becomes more selective during the first year of life as a function of varying experience with distinct face categories defined by species, race, and age. Given that any individual face belongs to many such categories (e.g. A young Caucasian man's face) we asked how the neural selectivity for one aspect of facial appearance was affected by category membership along another dimension of variability. 6-month-old infants were shown upright and inverted pictures of either their own mother or a stranger while event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded. We found that the amplitude of the P400 (a face-sensitive ERP component) was only sensitive to the orientation of the mother's face, suggesting that “tuning” of the neural response to faces is realized jointly across multiple dimensions of face appearance.

[1]  Y. Sugita.  Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Jesse S. Husk,et al.  Inverting houses and textures: Investigating the characteristics of learned inversion effects , 2007, Vision Research.

[3]  O. Pascalis,et al.  The Other-Race Effect Develops During Infancy , 2007, Psychological science.

[4]  Benjamin Balas,et al.  The Effect of Real-World Personal Familiarity on the Speed of Face Information Processing , 2007, PloS one.

[5]  O. Pascalis,et al.  A Domain-General Theory of the Development of Perceptual Discrimination , 2007, Current directions in psychological science.

[6]  Yumiko Otsuka,et al.  Neural activation to upright and inverted faces in infants measured by near infrared spectroscopy , 2007, NeuroImage.

[7]  Charles A. Nelson,et al.  A behavioural and ERP investigation of 3-month-olds’ face preferences , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  P. Bauer.  Constructing a past in infancy: a neuro-developmental account , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preference for face-relevant stimuli: effects of contrast polarity. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces. , 2005, Developmental science.

[11]  Mark H Johnson,et al.  Face-sensitive cortical processing in early infancy. , 2004, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[12]  Chiara Turati,et al.  Evidence of the Face Inversion Effect in 4-Month-Old Infants. , 2004, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[13]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Expression Influences the Recognition of Familiar Faces , 2004, Perception.

[14]  Raymond Bruyer,et al.  Ethnic Categorisation of Faces is Not Independent of Face Identity , 2004, Perception.

[15]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Cortical specialisation for face processing: face-sensitive event-related potential components in 3- and 12-month-old infants , 2003, NeuroImage.

[16]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Is sex categorization from faces really parallel to face recognition? , 2002 .

[17]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Representation of the Gender of Human Faces by Infants: A Preference for Female , 2002, Perception.

[18]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Is Face Processing Species-Specific During the First Year of Life? , 2002, Science.

[19]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Inversion and Contrast Polarity Reversal Affect both Encoding and Recognition Processes of Unfamiliar Faces: A Repetition Study Using ERPs , 2002, NeuroImage.

[20]  Olivier Pascalis,et al.  Specialization of Neural Mechanisms Underlying Face Recognition in Human Infants , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Recognition of individual faces and average face prototypes by 1- and 3-month-old infants , 2001 .

[22]  C. Nelson.  The Development and Neural Bases of Face Recognition , 2001 .

[23]  C. Nelson,et al.  Brain activity differentiates face and object processing in 6-month-old infants. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[24]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[25]  Olivier Pascalis,et al.  Mother's face recognition by neonates: A replication and an extension , 1995 .

[26]  G. Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[27]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[28]  T. Valentine.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[29]  C. McManus,et al.  Sensitivity to the Displacement of Facial Features in Negative and Inverted Images , 1990, Perception.

[30]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[31]  V. Bruce.  Influences of Familiarity on the Processing of Faces , 1986, Perception.

[32]  R. Galper,et al.  Recognition of faces in photographic negative , 1970 .

[33]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .