Who Passes Business’s “Model Bills”? Policy Capacity and Corporate Influence in U.S. State Politics

Which policymakers are most likely to enact legislation drafted by organized business interests? Departing from the business power scholarship that emphasizes structural, electoral, or financial mechanisms for corporate influence, I argue that lawmakers are likely to rely on businesses' proposals when they lack the time and resources to develop legislation on their own, especially when they also hold an ideological affinity for business. Using two new datasets of “model bills” developed by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a policy group that promotes pro-business legislation across the states, I find strong support for this theory. These results indicate that ALEC provides private policy capacity to state legislators who would otherwise lack such support, and relatedly, that low state policy capacity may favor certain organized interests over others—namely the business interests affiliated with ALEC. My findings have implications for the study of business influence in policymaking, as well as for state politics.

[1]  Robert A. Dahl,et al.  Politics, Economics, and Welfare. , 1953 .

[2]  George Rogers Taylor,et al.  Politics, Economics and Welfare. , 1953 .

[3]  Robert A. Dahl,et al.  Politics, Economics and Welfare , 1954 .

[4]  R. Dahl Business and Politics: A Critical Appraisal of Political Science , 1959, American Political Science Review.

[5]  E. E. Schattschneider The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America , 1960 .

[6]  Robert A. Dahl,et al.  Who Governs: Democracy and Power in an American City. , 1961 .

[7]  P. Bachrach,et al.  Two Faces of Power , 1962, American Political Science Review.

[8]  Richard F. Fenno Congressmen in committees , 1973 .

[9]  C. Lindblom,et al.  Politics And Markets: The World's Political-economic Systems , 1977 .

[10]  J. T. Tierney,et al.  More of the Same: Washington Pressure Group Activity in a Decade of Change , 1983, The Journal of Politics.

[11]  T. Edsall The new politics of inequality , 1984 .

[12]  W. Korpi Power Resources Approach vs. Action and Conflict: On Causal and Intentional Explanations in the Study of Power , 1985 .

[13]  Joel Rogers,et al.  Right Turn: The Decline of the Democrats and the Future of American Politics , 1986 .

[14]  J. Isaac,et al.  Beyond the Three Faces of Power: A Realist Critique , 1987, Polity.

[15]  David Vogel Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America , 1989 .

[16]  Wayne L. Francis The Legislative Committee Game: A Comparative Analysis of Fifty States , 1989 .

[17]  R. Arnold The logic of congressional action , 1990 .

[18]  G. J. Miller Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America , 1990 .

[19]  Keith Krehbiel,et al.  Organization of Informative Committees by a Rational Legislature , 1990 .

[20]  Money Talks: Corporate PACs and Political Influence. , 1992 .

[21]  Jr. James M. Snyder Long-Term Investing in Politicians; Or, Give Early, Give Often , 1992, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[22]  Steven P. Croley,et al.  Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919-1981 , 1992 .

[23]  David Austen-Smith,et al.  Information and influence: Lobbying for agendas and votes , 1993 .

[24]  E. W. Hawley Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919-1981 , 1994 .

[25]  Virginia Gray,et al.  The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States , 1996 .

[26]  Anthony J. Nownes,et al.  Interest Group Activity in the States , 1998, The Journal of Politics.

[27]  Anthony J. Nownes Solicited Advice and Lobbyist Power: Evidence from Three American States , 1999 .

[28]  Cathie J. Martin,et al.  Stuck in Neutral: Business and the Politics of Human Capital Investment Policy , 1999 .

[29]  J. Judis The Paradox of American Democracy: Elites, Special Interests, and the Betrayal of Public Trust , 2000 .

[30]  Mark A Smith American Business and Political Power: Public Opinion, Elections, and Democracy , 2000 .

[31]  Michael B. Berkman Legislative Professionalism and the Demand for Groups: The Institutional Context of Interest Population Density , 2001 .

[32]  Steven J. Balla,et al.  Interstate Professional Associations and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations , 2001 .

[33]  J. Hacker,et al.  Business Power and Social Policy: Employers and the Formation of the American Welfare State , 2002 .

[34]  Stephen Ansolabehere,et al.  Why is There so Little Money in Politics , 2003 .

[35]  Peter A. Swenson Varieties of Capitalist Interests: Power, Institutions, and the Regulatory Welfare State in the United States and Sweden , 2004, Studies in American Political Development.

[36]  Lynda W. Powell,et al.  Full-Time, Part-Time, and Real Time: Explaining State Legislators' Perceptions of Time on the Job , 2006, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[37]  Alan V. Deardorff,et al.  Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy , 2006, American Political Science Review.

[38]  A. Karch Democratic Laboratories: Policy Diffusion among the American States , 2007 .

[39]  Jules Townshend,et al.  Power, A Radical View , 2007 .

[40]  P. Squire,et al.  Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited , 2007, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[41]  Benjamin I. Page,et al.  Oligarchy in the United States? , 2009, Perspectives on Politics.

[42]  Jeffrey R. Lax,et al.  Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness , 2009, American Political Science Review.

[43]  W. S. Robinson,et al.  Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. , 1950, International journal of epidemiology.

[44]  J. Hacker,et al.  Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer--and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class , 2010 .

[45]  R. Pollin Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age , 2010 .

[46]  Nolan McCarty,et al.  The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures , 2010, American Political Science Review.

[47]  Pepper D. Culpepper Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan , 2010 .

[48]  William D. Berry,et al.  Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the U.S. States: A Re-appraisal , 2010, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[49]  Keith E. Hamm,et al.  Committee Specialization in U.S. State Legislatures during the 20th Century , 2011, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[50]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Republic, Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress--and a Plan to Stop It , 2011 .

[51]  Jeffrey R. Lax,et al.  The Democratic Deficit in the States , 2012 .

[52]  Julie F. Mead,et al.  A Smart ALEC Threatens Public Education , 2012 .

[53]  Lee Fang The Machine: A Field Guide to the Resurgent Right , 2012 .

[54]  Kay Lehman Schlozman,et al.  The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy , 2012 .

[55]  Duane H. Swank,et al.  The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth, and Equality , 2012 .

[56]  Martin Gilens,et al.  Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America , 2012 .

[57]  David E. Broockman The “Problem of Preferences”: Medicare and Business Support for the Welfare State* , 2012, Studies in American Political Development.

[58]  Lynda W. Powell The Influence of Campaign Contributions in State Legislatures: The Effects of Institutions and Politics , 2012 .

[59]  C. Witko,et al.  Federalism and American Inequality , 2012 .

[60]  B. Highton,et al.  How Does Multilevel Regression and Poststratification Perform with Conventional National Surveys? , 2013, Political Analysis.

[61]  F. Block The Fracturing of the American Corporate Elite , 2014 .

[62]  Lynda W. Powell,et al.  Perceptions of Time on the Job Full-Time, Part-Time, and Real Time: Explaining State Legislators' , 2014 .

[63]  Ivan Ermakoff Strength in Numbers: The Political Power of Weak Interests , 2015 .