Carbon management and environmental consequences of agricultural biomass in a Danish Renewable Energy strategy

This paper addresses the conversion of Danish agricultural land from food/feed crops to energy crops. To this end, a life cycle inventory, which relates the input and output flows from and to the environment of 528 different crop systems, is built and described. This includes seven crops (annuals and perennials), two soil types (sandy loam and sand), two climate types (wet and dry), three initial soil carbon level (high, average, low), two time horizons for soil carbon changes (20 and 100 years), two residues management practices (removal and incorporation into soil) as well as three soil carbon turnover rate reductions in response to the absence of tillage for some perennial crops (0%, 25%, 50%). For all crop systems, nutrient balances, balances between aboveand below-ground residues, soil carbon changes, biogenic carbon dioxide flows, emissions of nitrogen compounds and losses of macroand micronutrients are presented. The inventory results highlight Miscanthus as a promising energy crop, indicating it presents the lowest emissions of nitrogen compounds, the highest amount of carbon dioxide sequestrated from the atmosphere, a relatively high carbon turnover efficiency and allows to increase soil organic carbon. Results also show that the magnitude of these benefits depends on the harvest season, soil types and climatic conditions. Inventory results further highlight winter wheat as the only annual crop where straw removal for bioenergy may be sustainable, being the only annual crop not involving losses of soil organic carbon as a result of harvesting the straw. This, however, is conditional to manure application, and is only true on sandy soils.

[1]  B. M. Petersen,et al.  Developments in greenhouse gas emissions and net energy use in Danish agriculture - how to achieve substantial CO(2) reductions? , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[2]  Barbara Amon,et al.  Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment , 2006 .

[3]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Marginal production technologies for life cycle inventories , 1999 .

[4]  Timothy D. Searchinger,et al.  Biofuels and the need for additional carbon , 2010 .

[5]  Ruedi Müller-Wenk,et al.  Climatic impact of land use in LCA—carbon transfers between vegetation/soil and air , 2010 .

[6]  Kristian Kristensen,et al.  Winter wheat yield response to climate variability in Denmark , 2010, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[7]  J. Olesen,et al.  Region‐specific assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation with different manure management strategies in four agroecological zones , 2009 .

[8]  M. Andersson Reducing ammonia emissions by cooling of manure in manure culverts , 1998, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[9]  B. Mary,et al.  Biofuels, greenhouse gases and climate change. A review , 2011, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[10]  Bruno Mary,et al.  Modeling consequences of straw residues export on soil organic carbon , 2008 .

[11]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Agricultural crop-based biofuels – resource efficiency and environmental performance including direct land use changes , 2011 .

[12]  A. Lindroth,et al.  Assessment of regional willow coppice yield in Sweden on basis of water availability , 1999 .

[13]  J. Hermansen,et al.  Environmental consequences of different beef production systems in the EU , 2010 .

[14]  Alissa Kendall,et al.  Time-adjusted global warming potentials for LCA and carbon footprints , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[15]  B. Mathiesen,et al.  Energy system analysis of marginal electricity supply in consequential LCA , 2010 .

[16]  T. Ochsner,et al.  Tillage and soil carbon sequestration—What do we really know? , 2007 .

[17]  T. Minayeva,et al.  Assessment on Peatlands, Biodiversity and Climate Change , 2008 .

[18]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Slurry Management Technologies , 2009 .

[19]  E. Hansen,et al.  Nitrate leaching as influenced by soil tillage and catch crop , 1997 .

[20]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Environmental assessment of Ronozyme® P5000 CT phytase as an alternative to inorganic phosphate supplementation to pig feed used in intensive pig production , 2007 .

[21]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Environmental assessment of products , 1997 .

[22]  Jane M. F. Johnson,et al.  Estimating Source Carbon from Crop Residues, Roots and Rhizodeposits Using the National Grain-Yield Database , 2006 .

[23]  Eric D. Larson,et al.  A review of life-cycle analysis studies on liquid biofuel systems for the transport sector , 2006 .

[24]  L. S. Jensen,et al.  Catch crops and green manures as biological tools in nitrogen management in temperate zones , 2003 .

[25]  P. Balsari,et al.  Gaseous emissions from the storage of untreated slurries and the fractions obtained after mechanical separation , 2008 .

[26]  R. Clift,et al.  Soil Organic Carbon Changes in the Cultivation of Energy Crops: Implications for GHG Balances and Soil Quality for Use in LCA , 2011 .

[27]  Jørgen E. Olesen,et al.  A simplified modelling approach for quantifying tillage effects on soil carbon stocks , 2009 .

[28]  Ute Skiba,et al.  How do soil emissions of N2O, CH4 and CO2 from perennial bioenergy crops differ from arable annual crops? , 2012 .

[29]  J. Huijsmans,et al.  Ammonia volatilization from crop residues and frozen green manure crops , 2010 .

[30]  Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.  Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment - the EDIP-2003 methodology. Guidelines from the Danish EPA , 2004 .

[31]  Jørgen E. Olesen,et al.  A flexible tool for simulation of soil carbon turnover , 2002 .

[32]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  Energy system analysis of 100% renewable energy systems-The case of Denmark in years 2030 and 2050 , 2009 .

[33]  P. Weiland Biogas production: current state and perspectives , 2009, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[34]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[35]  B. Mathiesen,et al.  100% Renewable energy systems, climate mitigation and economic growth , 2011 .

[36]  N. Hutchings,et al.  Emissions of gaseous nitrogen species from manure management: a new approach. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[37]  R. Dalgaard The environmental impact of pork production from a life cycle perspective , 2007 .

[38]  T. Suzuki [Nitrogen oxides]. , 1971, Naika. Internal medicine.

[39]  Matthew J. Aylott,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from four bioenergy crops in England and Wales: Integrating spatial estimates of yield and soil carbon balance in life cycle analyses , 2009 .

[40]  A. Hastings,et al.  Food vs. fuel: the use of land for lignocellulosic ‘next generation’ energy crops that minimize competition with primary food production , 2012 .

[41]  Michael O'Hare,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels' indirect land use change are uncertain but may be much greater than previously estimated. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  Edwards Robert,et al.  Biofuels in the European Context , 2007 .

[43]  Root carbon input in organic and inorganic fertilizer-based systems , 2012, Plant and Soil.

[44]  K. Henriksen,et al.  Observations of production and emission of greenhouse gases and ammonia during storage of solids separated from pig slurry: Effects of covering , 2006 .

[45]  R. Harrison,et al.  A review of the effect of N fertilizer type on gaseous emissions , 2001 .

[46]  G. Robertson,et al.  Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere , 2000, Science.

[47]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Life Cycle Inventories of Agricultural Production Systems , 2007 .

[48]  A. M. Buswell,et al.  The Methane Fermentation of Carbohydrates1,2 , 1933 .

[49]  MICHAEL B. Jones,et al.  The impact of biomass crop cultivation on temperate biodiversity , 2010 .

[50]  B. Ahring,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of swine manure: Inhibition by ammonia , 1998 .

[51]  Uffe Jørgensen,et al.  Nitrate leaching during establishment of willow (Salix viminalis) on two soil types and at two fertilization levels , 1998 .

[52]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Methodology, tools and case studies in product development , 2000 .

[53]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Life cycle inventory modelling of land use induced by crop consumption , 2007 .

[54]  S. Godbout,et al.  Evaluating ammonia emission potential from concrete slat designs for pig housing , 2010 .

[55]  Finn Strudsholm,et al.  Fodermiddeltabel 12. Sammensætning og foderværdi af fodermidler til kvæg , 1992 .

[56]  Uffe Jørgensen,et al.  Genotypic variation in dry matter accumulation and content of N, K and Cl in Miscanthus in Denmark. , 1997 .

[57]  Jannick H. Schmidt System delimitation in agricultural consequential LCA , 2008 .

[58]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Environmental consequences of future biogas technologies based on separated slurry. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[59]  T. V. Kempen,et al.  Dietary adipic acid reduces ammonia emission from swine excreta. , 2001 .

[60]  E. Robert,et al.  Indirect Land Use Change From Increased Biofuels Demand - Comparison of Models and Results for Marginal Biofuels Production from Different Feedstocks , 2010 .

[61]  E. Hansen,et al.  Tillage effects on N2O emissions as influenced by a winter cover crop , 2011 .

[62]  K V Afonin,et al.  CALCULATIONS OF EMISSIONS SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS , 2014 .

[63]  E. Hertwich,et al.  CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming , 2011 .