Effective radiation exposure in evaluation and follow-up of patients with urolithiasis.

OBJECTIVE To quantify the effective radiation dose associated with the evaluation and follow-up of patients with urolithiasis. METHODS Retrospective review was performed for consecutive patients presenting to a tertiary stone clinic with acute stone episodes between November 2007 and December 2008, and had at least 2 years of follow-up. Number and modality of imaging studies were collected. Effective radiation exposure (ERE) doses were calculated from the dose length product values reported with each computed tomography (CT) scan. RESULTS There were 72 males and 32 females with a mean age of 49 years (range 21-78). Patients underwent an average 1.8 (range 0-5) and 0.7 (range 0-2) plain radiographs, 0.82 (range 0-4) and 0.15 (range 0-2) CTs, 0.09 (range 0-1) and 0.03 (range 0-1) intravenous urograms, and 0.3 (range 0-1) and 0.6 (range 0-2) ultrasounds (US) during the first and second years, respectively (all P<.05). The average calculated ERE dose per CT scan was 23.16 mSv (range 4.94-72.77). The calculated mean ERE dose per patient significantly decreased from 29.29 mSv (range 1.7-77.27) in the first year to 8.04 mSv (range 1.4-24.72) in the second year (P<.01). This was because of significantly fewer CT scans and significantly more US imaging during the second year (P<.05). Although 18 (17.3%) patients exceeded 50 mSv during the first year, none exceeded this threshold during the second year. The mean ERE dose did not correlate with stone location, patient age, and sex. CONCLUSION The calculated mean ERE dose significantly decreased during the second year of follow-up in patients with urolithiasis because of significantly higher use of US.

[1]  G. Bongartz,et al.  Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  B. Yeh,et al.  CT radiation dose: what can you do right now in your practice? , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  M. Pearle,et al.  Radiation exposure in the acute and short-term management of urolithiasis at 2 academic centers. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[4]  Philip H Heintz,et al.  CT scanning: a major source of radiation exposure. , 2002, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[5]  J. Heldt,et al.  Effect of low dose radiation computerized tomography protocols on distal ureteral calculus detection. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[6]  J. Damilakis,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT EFFECTIVE RADIATION DOSE AND ASSOCIATED RADIOGENIC RISK FROM EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY , 2002, Health physics.

[7]  C. Iselin,et al.  Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  C. McCollough,et al.  CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[9]  Patrik Rogalla,et al.  Does Ultra-Low-Dose CT With a Radiation Dose Equivalent to That of KUB Suffice to Detect Renal and Ureteral Calculi? , 2006, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  Division on Earth.  Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 , 2006 .

[11]  Uday Patel,et al.  What radiation exposure can a patient expect during a single stone episode? , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[12]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  K. Anson,et al.  Urinary tract stones--Part I: role of radiological imaging in diagnosis and treatment planning. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[14]  F. Thorsen,et al.  Comparison of effective radiation doses in patients undergoing unenhanced MDCT and excretory urography for acute flank pain. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Plain abdominal radiography with transabdominal native tissue harmonic imaging ultrasonography vs unenhanced computed tomography in renal colic , 2007, BJU International.

[16]  M. Monga,et al.  Imaging modalities for urolithiasis: impact on management , 2008, Current opinion in urology.

[17]  Mannudeep K Kalra,et al.  Detection of urinary tract stones at low-radiation-dose CT with z-axis automatic tube current modulation: phantom and clinical studies. , 2005, Radiology.