Fleet Management for HDVs and CAVs on Highway in Dense Fog Environment

Adverse weather conditions have a significant impairment on the safety, mobility, and efficiency of highway networks. Dense fog is considered the most dangerous within the adverse weather conditions. As to improve the traffic flow throughput and driving safety in dense fog weather condition on highway, this paper uses a mathematical modeling method to study and control the fleet mixed with human-driven vehicles (HDVs) and connected automatic vehicles (CAVs) in dense fog environment on highway based on distributed model predictive control algorithm (DMPC), along with considering the car-following behavior of HDVs driver based on cellular automatic (CA) model. It aims to provide a feasible solution for controlling the mixed flow of HDVs and CAVs more safely, accurately, and stably and then potentially to improve the mobility and efficiency of highway networks in adverse weather conditions, especially in dense fog environment. This paper explores the modeling framework of the fleet management for HDVs and CAVs, including the state space model of CAVs, the car-following model of HDVs, distributed model predictive control for the fleet, and the fleet stability analysis. The state space model is proposed to identify the status of the feet in the global state. The car-following model is proposed to simulate the driver behavior in the fleet in local. The DMPC-based model is proposed to optimize rolling of the fleet. Finally, this paper used the Lyapunov stability principle to analyze and prove the stability of the fleet in dense fog environment. Finally, numerical experiments were performed in MATLAB to verify the effectiveness of the proposed model. The results showed that the proposed fleet control model has the ability of local asymptotic stability and global nonstrict string stability.

[1]  S. Barnett Linear system theory and design: By C.-T. Chen , 1986, Autom..

[2]  Wei Wang,et al.  Development of a variable speed limit strategy to reduce secondary collision risks during inclement weathers. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  David Q. Mayne,et al.  Invariant approximations of the minimal robust positively Invariant set , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[4]  Bart De Schutter,et al.  Model predictive control for optimal coordination of ramp metering and variable speed limits , 2005 .

[5]  Liping Fu,et al.  Effects of winter weather on traffic operations and optimization of signalized intersections , 2019, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition).

[6]  Ting Fu,et al.  Investigating rear-end collision avoidance behavior under varied foggy weather conditions: A study using advanced driving simulator and survival analysis. , 2020, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Ghulam H Bham,et al.  A HIGH FIDELITY TRAFFIC SIMULATION MODEL BASED ON CELLULAR AUTOMATA AND CAR-FOLLOWING CONCEPTS , 2004 .

[8]  Gao Jian-ping,et al.  Research on the fixation transition behavior of drivers on expressway in foggy environment , 2019, Safety Science.

[9]  David Q. Mayne,et al.  Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality , 2000, Autom..

[10]  Mohamed M Ahmed,et al.  Real-time assessment of fog-related crashes using airport weather data: a feasibility analysis. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Chen Jianyang DENSE FOG AND FREEWAY TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS , 1998 .

[12]  Wang Yanli,et al.  Real-time prediction of crash risk on freeways under fog conditions , 2020 .

[13]  Wei Wang,et al.  Identifying crash-prone traffic conditions under different weather on freeways. , 2013, Journal of safety research.

[14]  Chi-Tsong Chen,et al.  Linear System Theory and Design , 1995 .

[15]  Felix Siebert,et al.  How speed and visibility influence preferred headway distances in highly automated driving , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[16]  Lili Du,et al.  Cooperative platoon control for a mixed traffic flow including human drive vehicles and connected and autonomous vehicles , 2018, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[17]  Bin Ran,et al.  An asymmetric cellular automata model for heterogeneous traffic flow on freeways with a climbing lane , 2019 .

[18]  William B. Dunbar,et al.  Distributed receding horizon control for multi-vehicle formation stabilization , 2006, Autom..

[19]  Sina Bahrami,et al.  Optimal traffic management policies for mixed human and automated traffic flows , 2020 .

[20]  Jin-hua Tan Impact of risk illusions on traffic flow in fog weather , 2019 .

[21]  Xiaohua Zhao,et al.  Influence of adverse weather on drivers’ perceived risk during car following based on driving simulations , 2019, Journal of Modern Transportation.

[22]  Leonard Evans,et al.  Fatal crashes involving large numbers of vehicles and weather. , 2017, Journal of safety research.

[23]  Bart De Moor,et al.  Cellular automata models of road traffic , 2005, physics/0509082.

[24]  Toshiyuki Yamamoto,et al.  An Analysis on Mixed Traffic Flow of Conventional Passenger Cars and Microcars Using a Cellular Automata Model , 2012 .

[25]  Soyoung Ahn,et al.  Traffic dynamics under speed disturbance in mixed traffic with automated and non-automated vehicles , 2019 .

[26]  Lili Du,et al.  Constrained optimization and distributed computation based car following control of a connected and autonomous vehicle platoon , 2016 .

[27]  Zbigniew Galias,et al.  Study of zero-order holder discretization in single input sliding mode control systems , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[28]  Juneyoung Park,et al.  Effects of crash warning systems on rear-end crash avoidance behavior under fog conditions , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[29]  Feng Chen,et al.  Techniques for efficient detection of rapid weather changes and analysis of their impacts on a highway network , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data).

[30]  Fabrice Vienne,et al.  Driver behaviour in fog is not only a question of degraded visibility – A simulator study , 2017 .

[31]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Area-wide real-world test scenarios of poor visibility for safe development of automated vehicles , 2018 .

[32]  Nathan van de Wouw,et al.  Graceful Degradation of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[33]  Juneyoung Park,et al.  Effects of real-time warning systems on driving under fog conditions using an empirically supported speed choice modeling framework , 2018 .

[34]  Hany M. Hassan,et al.  Predicting reduced visibility related crashes on freeways using real-time traffic flow data. , 2013, Journal of safety research.

[35]  Soyoung Ahn,et al.  Distributed model predictive control approach for cooperative car-following with guaranteed local and string stability , 2019, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[36]  Juneyoung Park,et al.  Developing an algorithm to assess the rear-end collision risk under fog conditions using real-time data , 2018 .

[37]  Wuhong Wang,et al.  A cross-cultural analysis of driving behavior under critical situations: A driving simulator study , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[38]  Ashley Martin,et al.  Speed choice and driving performance in simulated foggy conditions. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[39]  Soyoung Ahn,et al.  A behavioural car-following model that captures traffic oscillations , 2012 .