Breast ultrasound despeckling using anisotropic diffusion guided by texture descriptors.

Breast ultrasound (BUS) is considered the most important adjunct method to mammography for diagnosing cancer. However, this image modality suffers from an intrinsic artifact called speckle noise, which degrades spatial and contrast resolution and obscures the screened anatomy. Hence, it is necessary to reduce speckle artifacts before performing image analysis by means of computer-aided diagnosis systems, for example. In addition, the trade-off between smoothing level and preservation of lesion contour details should be addressed by speckle reduction schemes. In this scenario, we propose a BUS despeckling method based on anisotropic diffusion guided by Log-Gabor filters (ADLG). Because we assume that different breast tissues have distinct textures, in our approach we perform a multichannel decomposition of the BUS image using Log-Gabor filters. Next, the conduction coefficient of anisotropic diffusion filtering is computed using texture responses instead of intensity values as stated originally. The proposed algorithm is validated using both synthetic and real breast data sets, with 900 and 50 images, respectively. The performance measures are compared with four existing speckle reduction schemes based on anisotropic diffusion: conventional anisotropic diffusion filtering (CADF), speckle-reducing anisotropic diffusion (SRAD), texture-oriented anisotropic diffusion (TOAD), and interference-based speckle filtering followed by anisotropic diffusion (ISFAD). The validity metrics are the Pratt's figure of merit, for synthetic images, and the mean radial distance (in pixels), for real sonographies. Figure of merit and mean radial distance indices should tend toward '1' and '0', respectively, to indicate adequate edge preservation. The results suggest that ADLG outperforms the four speckle removal filters compared with respect to simulated and real BUS images. For each method--ADLG, CADF, SRAD, TOAD and ISFAD--the figure of merit median values are 0.83, 0.40, 0.39, 0.51 and 0.59, and the mean radial distance median results are 4.19, 6.29, 6.39, 6.43 and 5.88.

[1]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Scale-Space and Edge Detection Using Anisotropic Diffusion , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  T. Loupas,et al.  An adaptive weighted median filter for speckle suppression in medical ultrasonic images , 1989 .

[3]  P. Rousseeuw,et al.  Alternatives to the Median Absolute Deviation , 1993 .

[4]  E. Costa,et al.  Ultrasound speckle reduction using modified gabor filters , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  H. Chenga,et al.  Automated breast cancer detection and classification using ultrasound images A survey , 2009 .

[6]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[7]  Wei Wang,et al.  Design and implementation of Log-Gabor filter in fingerprint image enhancement , 2008, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[8]  M. Giger,et al.  Automatic segmentation of breast lesions on ultrasound. , 2001, Medical physics.

[9]  Tomy Varghese,et al.  Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for testing elastography systems. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  A. Tannenbaum,et al.  Despeckling of medical ultrasound images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  Detection of lines and boundaries in speckle images-application to medical ultrasound , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Vicent Caselles,et al.  Texture-Oriented Anisotropic Filtering and Geodesic Active Contours in Breast Tumor Ultrasound Segmentation , 2007, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[13]  F. M. Cardoso,et al.  Edge-preserving speckle texture removal by interference-based speckle filtering followed by anisotropic diffusion. , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  S. Katyal,et al.  US artifacts. , 2009, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[15]  Martin D. Fox,et al.  Speckle Reduction and Structure Enhancement by Multichannel Median Boosted Anisotropic Diffusion , 2004, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[16]  Y. Chou,et al.  Stepwise logistic regression analysis of tumor contour features for breast ultrasound diagnosis. , 2001, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[17]  Nixon,et al.  Using the Mode for Speckle Filtering in Ultrasound Images for Feature Extraction , 1993 .

[18]  E. Nezry,et al.  Adaptive speckle filters and scene heterogeneity , 1990 .

[19]  V. Jackson The role of US in breast imaging. , 1990, Radiology.

[20]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  Nicolai Petkov,et al.  Nonlinear operator for oriented texture , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[22]  Peter Kovesi,et al.  Symmetry and Asymmetry from Local Phase , 1997 .

[23]  E. R. Davies Computer and Machine Vision: Theory, Algorithms, Practicalities , 2012 .

[24]  E.E. Pissaloux,et al.  Image Processing , 1994, Proceedings. Second Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing.

[25]  Enzo Galligioni,et al.  Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[26]  André Victor Alvarenga,et al.  Breast Ultrasound Segmentation Using Morphologic Operators and a Gaussian Function Constraint , 2008 .

[27]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Unsupervised texture segmentation using Gabor filters , 1990, 1990 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Conference Proceedings.

[28]  Yuxuan Wang,et al.  Completely automated segmentation approach for breast ultrasound images using multiple-domain features. , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[29]  Joachim Weickert,et al.  Anisotropic diffusion in image processing , 1996 .

[30]  Martial Hebert,et al.  Toward Objective Evaluation of Image Segmentation Algorithms , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[31]  G. Trahey,et al.  A seminar on k-space applied to medical ultrasound , 2000 .

[32]  Abd-elrahma Hassan,et al.  Benign Versus Malignant Solid Breast Masses: US Differentiation , 2015 .

[33]  W. Pereira,et al.  Assessing the performance of morphological parameters in distinguishing breast tumors on ultrasound images. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[34]  Johan M. Thijssen,et al.  Ultrasonic speckle formation, analysis and processing applied to tissue characterization , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[35]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[36]  Wendie A Berg,et al.  Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for qualification of Investigators for ACRIN Protocol 6666. , 2006, Radiology.