Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403.

Abstract : Even today, many complex and important skills, such as those required for language use and social interaction, are learned informally through apprenticeshiplike methods -- i.e., methods involving not didactic teaching, but observation, coaching, and successive approximation while carrying out a variety of tasks and activities. The differences between formal schooling and apprenticeship methods are many, but for our purposes, one is most important. Perhaps as a by-product of the specialization of learning in schools, skills and knowledge taught in schools have become abstracted from their uses in the world. In apprenticeship learning, on the other hand, target skills are not only continually in use by skilled practitioners, but are instrumental to the accomplishment of meaningful tasks. Said differently, apprenticeship embeds the learning of skills and knowledge in the social and functional context of their use. This difference is not academic, but has serious implications for the nature of the knowledge that students acquire. This paper attempts to elucidate some of those implications through a proposal for the retooling of apprenticeship methods for the teaching and learning of cognitive skills. Specifically, we propose the development of a new cognitive apprenticeship to teach students the thinking and problem-solving skills involved in school subjects such as reading, writing and mathematics.

[1]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Teaching the process of reading comprehension , 1980 .

[2]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The psychology of written composition , 1987 .

[3]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Designing Computer Games to Help Physics Students Understand Newton's Laws of Motion , 1984 .

[4]  Bill Bruns,et al.  Vic Braden's Tennis for the future , 1977 .

[5]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Diagnostic Models for Procedural Bugs in Basic Mathematical Skills , 1978, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  Repair Theory: A Generative Theory of Bugs in Procedural Skills , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  R. Glaser Advances in Instructional Psychology , 1978 .

[8]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Problem Solving in the Mathematics Curriculum. A Report, Recommendations, and an Annotated Bibliography. MAA Notes, Number 1. , 1983 .

[9]  Allan Collins,et al.  A Cognitive Theory of Interactive Teaching. , 1981 .

[10]  J. W. Getzels,et al.  The Creative Vision: A Longitudinal Study of Problem Finding in Art , 1977 .

[11]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Teachability of Reflective Processes in Written Composition , 1984, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension Strategies: A Natural History of One Program for Enhancing Learning. Technical Report No. 334. , 1985 .

[14]  Gary M. Olson,et al.  Learning and motivation in the classroom , 1983 .

[15]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[16]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Process versus Product: A Perspective on Tools for Communal and Informal Electronic Learning , 1985 .

[17]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  The hidden costs of rewards , 1976 .

[18]  W. Timothy Gallwey,et al.  The Inner Game of Tennis , 1974 .

[19]  Allan Collins,et al.  THE COMPUTER AS A TOOL FOR LEARNING THROUGH REFLECTION , 1986 .

[20]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 1988, Cognitive Science.

[21]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[22]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Progressions of Qualitative Models as a Foundation for Intelligent Learning Environments. Report No. 6277. , 1986 .

[23]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Inference in text understanding , 2017 .

[24]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Mathematical Problem Solving , 1985 .