Economic difficulties and physical functioning in Finnish and British employees: contribution of social and behavioural factors.

BACKGROUND Childhood and current economic difficulties are associated with physical health. However, evidence concerning the factors underlying these associations is sparse. This study examines the contribution of a range of social and behavioural factors to associations between economic difficulties and physical functioning. METHODS We used comparable data on middle-aged white-collar employees from the Finnish Helsinki Health Study cohort (n = 3843) and the British Whitehall II Study cohort (n = 3052). Our health outcome was physical functioning measured by the SF-36 Physical Component Summary. Relative indices of inequality (RII), calculated using logistic regression analysis, were used to examine associations between economic difficulties and physical functioning, and the contribution of further socio-economic circumstances, health behaviours, living arrangements and work-family conflicts to these associations. RESULTS In age-adjusted models, childhood (RII = 1.76-3.06) and current (RII = 1.79-3.03) economic difficulties were associated with poor physical functioning in both cohorts. Further adjusting for work-family conflicts attenuated the associations of current economic difficulties with physical functioning in both cohorts, and also those of childhood economic difficulties in the Helsinki cohort. Adjustments for other socio-economic circumstances also caused some attenuation, while health behaviours and living arrangements had small or negligible effects. CONCLUSIONS Conflicts between work and family contribute to the associations of economic difficulties with physical functioning among employees from Finland and Britain. This suggests that supporting people to cope with economic difficulties, and efforts to improve the balance between paid work and family may help employees maintain good physical functioning.

[1]  M. Marmot,et al.  Work–Family Conflicts and Health Behaviors Among British, Finnish, and Japanese Employees , 2010, International journal of behavioral medicine.

[2]  P. Martikainen,et al.  The effects of individual taxable income, household taxable income, and household disposable income on mortality in Finland, 1998–2004 , 2009, Population studies.

[3]  M. Marmot,et al.  Economic difficulties and common mental disorders among Finnish and British white-collar employees: the contribution of social and behavioural factors , 2009, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[4]  M. Marmot,et al.  Associations of multiple socio-economic circumstances with physical functioning among Finnish and British employees. , 2008, European journal of public health.

[5]  M. Marmot,et al.  Socioeconomic circumstances and common mental disorders among Finnish and British public sector employees: evidence from the Helsinki Health Study and the Whitehall II Study. , 2007, International journal of epidemiology.

[6]  R. Araya,et al.  Socio-economic position and common mental disorders , 2006, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[7]  L. Pearlin,et al.  Financial Strain over the Life Course and Health among Older Adults∗ , 2006, Journal of health and social behavior.

[8]  M. Metzler,et al.  Socioeconomic status in health research: one size does not fit all. , 2005, JAMA.

[9]  Wayne Katon,et al.  Socioeconomic status, depression disparities, and financial strain: what lies behind the income-depression relationship? , 2005, Health economics.

[10]  P. Martikainen,et al.  Occupational class inequalities across key domains of health: results from the Helsinki Health Study. , 2005, European journal of public health.

[11]  L. Pearlin,et al.  The Sense of Mastery as a Mediator and Moderator in the Association Between Economic Hardship and Health in Late Life , 2005, Journal of aging and health.

[12]  P. Martikainen,et al.  Socioeconomic position and self-rated health: the contribution of childhood socioeconomic circumstances, adult socioeconomic status, and material resources. , 2005, American journal of public health.

[13]  M. Marmot,et al.  Self-reported economic difficulties and coronary events in men: evidence from the Whitehall II study. , 2005, International journal of epidemiology.

[14]  Michael Marmot,et al.  Cohort Profile: the Whitehall II study. , 2005, International journal of epidemiology.

[15]  P. Royston Multiple Imputation of Missing Values , 2004 .

[16]  D. Williamson,et al.  Assessing the reliability of retrospective reports of adverse childhood experiences among adult HMO members attending a primary care clinic. , 2004, Child abuse & neglect.

[17]  Y. Ben-Shlomo,et al.  Life course epidemiology , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[18]  A. Caspi,et al.  For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission from the Lancet Publishing Group , 2022 .

[19]  K. Judge,et al.  Income and health: the time dimension. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[20]  P. Lavrakas,et al.  Over the limit: the association among health, race and debt. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[21]  P. Martikainen,et al.  Bias related to the exclusion of the economically inactive in studies on social class differences in mortality. , 1999, International journal of epidemiology.

[22]  M. Marmot,et al.  Psychosocial Work Characteristics and Social Support as Predictors of SF-36 Health Functioning: The Whitehall II Study , 1998, Psychosomatic medicine.

[23]  N. Krieger,et al.  Adult female twins' recall of childhood social class and father's education: a validation study for public health research. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[24]  G. Watt,et al.  Education and occupational social class: which is the more important indicator of mortality risk? , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[25]  J. Mackenbach,et al.  Measuring the magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in health: an overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[26]  Robert McMurrian,et al.  Development and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales. , 1996 .

[27]  Gower Street,et al.  Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study , 1991, The Lancet.

[28]  L. Pearlin The sociological study of stress. , 1989, Journal of health and social behavior.

[29]  L. Pearlin,et al.  The structure of coping. , 1978, Journal of health and social behavior.

[30]  J. Lynch,et al.  Measuring socioeconomic position in health research. , 2007, British medical bulletin.

[31]  Susan Egerter,et al.  Socioeconomic Status in Health Research , 2005 .

[32]  J. Ware,et al.  Interpreting SF&-36 summary health measures: A response , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[33]  J. Grzywacz,et al.  Reconceptualizing the work-family interface: an ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. , 2000, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[34]  P. Gottschalk,et al.  Cross-National Comparisons of Earnings and Income Inequality , 1997 .

[35]  Aldi J. M. Hagenaars,et al.  Poverty Statistics in the Late 1980s: Research Based on Micro-data , 1994 .

[36]  John E. Ware,et al.  SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales : a user's manual , 1994 .

[37]  G. Smith,et al.  Social selection: what does it contribute to social class differences in health? , 1993 .

[38]  G. Esping‐Andersen,et al.  The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism , 1990 .

[39]  D. Watson Intraindividual and interindividual analyses of positive and negative affect: their relation to health complaints, perceived stress, and daily activities. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.