Weapon System Capability Assessment under uncertainty based on the evidential reasoning approach

Abstract Weapon System Capability Assessment (WSCA) is the initial point of quantification of capabilities in the military capability planning (MCP). WSCA is often a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problem with both quantitative and qualitative information under uncertain environment. In this paper, the analysis process and algorithm for WSCA problem is proposed on the basis of belief structure (BS) model and evidential reasoning (ER) approach which were developed to deal with various types of uncertainties such as ignorance and subjectiveness. First of all, the WSCA criteria hierarchy is built by analyzing how the capability is measured. Secondly, a weapon system capability model is formulated using BS. Thirdly, both qualitative and quantitative information involved in capability measure are transformed into BSs by the data transformation algorithm based on rules. Then, the analytical ER approach is used to aggregate the capability measurement information from sub-capability criteria to top-capability criterion, and the assessed weapon systems are ranked and analyzed according to utility intervals. Finally, a case study of real Main Battle Tank capability assessment is explored to show the proposed process for WSCA.

[1]  Tiejun Jiang,et al.  Study on Tradeoffs Between Weapon System Cost and Performance Based on Support Vector Machine , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[2]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  A General Multi-Level Evaluation Process for Hybrid MADM With Uncertainty , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[3]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Group-based ER-AHP system for product project screening , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Timothy Hanratty,et al.  Technology and tank maintenance: An AI-based diagnostic system for the Abrams tank , 1996 .

[6]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  An evidential reasoning based approach for quality function deployment under uncertainty , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[8]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  M. Singh,et al.  An Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multiple-Attribute Decision Making with Uncertainty , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[10]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Situational ME-LOWA Aggregation Model for Evaluating the Best Main Battle Tank , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[12]  Technical Cooperation Program Guide to Capability-based Planning , 1969 .

[13]  Don-lin Mon,et al.  Evaluating weapon system by Analytical Hierarchy Process based on fuzzy scales , 1994 .

[14]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[16]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Evaluating weapon systems using ranking fuzzy numbers , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[17]  Cunbao Ma,et al.  A New Fuzzy MCDM Method Based on Trapezoidal Fuzzy AHP and Hierarchical Fuzzy Integral , 2005, FSKD.

[18]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Paul K. Davis,et al.  Analytic Architecture for Capabilities-Based Planning, Mission-System Analysis, and Transformation , 2002 .

[20]  Serkan Yavuz,et al.  Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Deng Yong,et al.  Evaluating the Main Battle Tank Using Fuzzy Number Arithmetic Operations , 2006 .

[23]  Ching-Hsue Cheng Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function , 1997 .

[24]  Hussein A. Abbass,et al.  A MULTI-OBJECTIVE RISK-BASED FRAMEWORK FOR MISSION CAPABILITY PLANNING , 2009 .

[25]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .