Effects of a computerized decision support system on care planning for pressure ulcers and malnutrition in nursing homes: An intervention study

BACKGROUND Nursing documentation is essential for facilitating the flow of information to guarantee continuity, quality and safety in care. High-quality nursing documentation is frequently lacking; the implementation of computerized decision support systems is expected to improve clinical practice and nursing documentation. AIM The present study aimed at investigate the effects of a computerized decision support system and an educational program as intervention strategies for improved nursing documentation practice on pressure ulcers and malnutrition in nursing homes. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS An intervention study with two intervention groups and one control group was used. Fifteen nursing homes in southern Norway were included. A convenience sample of electronic healthcare records from 46 units was included. Inclusion criteria were records with presence of pressure ulcers and/or malnutrition. The residents were assessed before and after an intervention of a computerized decision support system in the electronic healthcare records. Data were collected through a review of 150 records before (2007) and 141 records after the intervention (2009). METHODS The nurses in intervention group 1 were offered educational sessions and were trained to use the computerized decision support system, which they used for eight months in 2008 and 2009. The nurses in intervention group 2 were offered the same educational program but did not use the computerized decision support system. The nurses in the control group were not subject to any intervention. The resident records were examined for the completeness and comprehensiveness of the documentation of pressure ulcers and malnutrition with three data collection forms and the data were analyzed with non-parametric statistics. RESULTS The implementation of the computerized decision support system and the educational program resulted in a more complete and comprehensive documentation of pressure ulcer- and malnutrition-related nursing assessments and nursing interventions. CONCLUSION This study provides evidence that the computerized decision support system and an educational program as implementation strategies had a positive influence on nursing documentation practice.

[1]  Robert A. Greenes,et al.  Clinical Decision Support: The Road Ahead , 2006 .

[2]  J. Larrabee,et al.  Evaluation of documentation before and after implementation of a nursing information system in an acute care hospital. , 2001, Computers in nursing.

[3]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[4]  Ping Yu,et al.  Caregivers' acceptance of electronic documentation in nursing homes , 2008, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[5]  S. Pang,et al.  Pressure ulcer development in older residents in nursing homes: influencing factors. , 2009, Journal of advanced nursing.

[6]  S. Georgiades.  Quality of Nursing Home Care in Cyprus: Are Elder Residents Content with Their Treatment? , 2008, Journal of gerontological social work.

[7]  P. Voutilainen,et al.  Nursing documentation in nursing homes--state-of-the-art and implications for quality improvement. , 2004, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[8]  Ping Yu,et al.  The changes in caregivers' perceptions about the quality of information and benefits of nursing documentation associated with the introduction of an electronic documentation system in a nursing home , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[9]  Catrin Björvell,et al.  Long-term increase in quality of nursing documentation: effects of a comprehensive intervention. , 2002, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[10]  Gregory L. Alexander,et al.  Effects of a computerized decision support system on pressure ulcers and malnutrition in nursing homes for the elderly , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[11]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  Effects of a Computer-based Nursing Documentation System on the Quality of Nursing Documentation , 2007, Journal of Medical Systems.

[12]  D. Bates,et al.  Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  A. Forsberg,et al.  Evaluation of documented nursing care plans by the use of nursing-sensitive outcome indicators. , 2010, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[14]  M Ehnfors,et al.  The accuracy of patient records in Swedish nursing homes: congruence of record content and nurses' and patients' descriptions. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[15]  M Ehnfors,et al.  Nursing care as documented in patient records. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[16]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[17]  Nancy M. Lorenzi,et al.  Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Computer-based Intensive Insulin Therapy Nih Public Access Author Manuscript , 2022 .

[18]  Kaija Saranto,et al.  Evaluating nursing documentation - research designs and methods: systematic review. , 2009, Journal of advanced nursing.

[19]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  Nursing process documentation systems in clinical routine - prerequisites and experiences , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[20]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  J M Grimshaw,et al.  Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[22]  D. Berlowitz,et al.  Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Nursing Home , 2001, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[23]  S. Sprigle,et al.  Assessing evidence supporting redistribution of pressure for pressure ulcer prevention: a review. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[24]  A. Ehrenberg,et al.  Accuracy and Quality in the Nursing Documentation of Pressure Ulcers: A Comparison of Record Content and Patient Examination , 2004, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[25]  S. Pocock,et al.  Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach , 1984 .

[26]  A. Ehrenberg,et al.  Auditing nursing content in patient records. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[27]  M. Rantz,et al.  Nursing Home Quality and Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management Practices , 2004, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[28]  Ragnhild Hellesø,et al.  The quality of home care nurses' documentation in new electronic patient records. , 2010, Journal of clinical nursing.

[29]  N. Mitchell,et al.  Clinical decision support systems in nursing , 2009 .

[30]  Karen New,et al.  Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[31]  C. Hankey,et al.  Nutritional issues and potential interventions in older people , 2011 .

[32]  F. Timmins.  Nursing Research Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice , 2013 .

[33]  Y. Guigoz.  The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) review of the literature--What does it tell us? , 2006, The journal of nutrition, health & aging.

[34]  J. Schols,et al.  Malnutrition prevalence in The Netherlands: results of the annual dutch national prevalence measurement of care problems. , 2008, The British journal of nutrition.

[35]  Ruth A. Anderson,et al.  Barriers to and Facilitators of Clinical Practice Guideline Use in Nursing Homes , 2007, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[36]  Greg Alexander,et al.  Cost, staffing and quality impact of bedside electronic medical record (EMR) in nursing homes. , 2010, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[37]  Steven R. Simon,et al.  The relationship between electronic health record use and quality of care over time. , 2009, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[38]  Anna Ehrenberg,et al.  Improved quality and comprehensiveness in nursing documentation of pressure ulcers after implementing an electronic health record in hospital care. , 2009, Journal of clinical nursing.

[39]  Bernice W. Polemis.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1959 .

[40]  Patient records in nursing homes. Effects of training on content and comprehensiveness. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[41]  C. R.J.,et al.  Statistics with Confidence (2nd ed.) , 2003 .

[42]  J. Hamers,et al.  Monitoring quality of care in nursing homes and making information available for the general public: state of the art. , 2010, Patient education and counseling.

[43]  Walter Ricciardi,et al.  The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review , 2010, BMC health services research.

[44]  Luke Vale,et al.  Toward evidence-based quality improvement , 2006 .

[45]  Rebecca Randell,et al.  Effects of computerized decision support systems on nursing performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review , 2007, Journal of health services research & policy.

[46]  Walter Sermeus,et al.  Prevalence of accurate nursing documentation in patient records. , 2010, Journal of advanced nursing.

[47]  A. Ehrenberg,et al.  Patient problems, needs, and nursing diagnoses in Swedish nursing home records. , 1999, Nursing diagnosis : ND : the official journal of the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association.

[48]  B. Vincenzi,et al.  'If it is not recorded, it has not been done!'? consistency between nursing records and observed nursing care in an Italian hospital. , 2010, Journal of Clinical Nursing.

[49]  Christine Urquhart,et al.  Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practice and healthcare outcomes. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[50]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  Research Paper: Factors Affecting and Affected by User Acceptance of Computer-based Nursing Documentation: Results of a Two-year Study , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[51]  Eva Törnvall,et al.  Advancing nursing documentation - An intervention study using patients with leg ulcer as an example , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[52]  M. Smithson.  Statistics with confidence , 2000 .

[53]  P. Willson,et al.  Clinical Decision Support Systems in Nursing: Synthesis of the Science for Evidence-Based Practice , 2008, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[54]  S. Holm.  A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[55]  B. Saveman,et al.  Inadequate care in Norwegian nursing homes--as reported by nursing staff. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[56]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[57]  Lars-Erik Strender,et al.  A guideline-based computerised decision support system (CDSS) to influence general practitioners management of chronic heart failure. , 2008, Informatics in primary care.

[58]  Cynthia J Brown,et al.  Undernutrition in Hospitalized Older Adults: Patterns and Correlates, Outcomes, and Opportunities for Intervention with a Focus on Processes of Care , 2010, Journal of nutrition for the elderly.

[59]  P. King.  What does it tell us , 2010 .

[60]  Rebecca Randell,et al.  Organisational Influences on Nurses' Use of Clinical Decision Support Systems Senior Lecturer in Clinical Decision Making , 2014 .

[61]  Joseph Finkelstein,et al.  The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in medical informatics. , 2006, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[62]  V. Sørlie,et al.  Dignity of older people in a nursing home: Narratives of care providers , 2010, Nursing ethics.