COMPETITIVE RESPONSE HIERARCHIES FOR GERMINATION, GROWTH, AND SURVIVAL AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON ABUNDANCE

Among plants, differences in competition intensity and in the ranking of competitive ability for traits such as germination, growth, and survival may suggest that the importance of competition for population success varies with the trait measured. If a species is a good competitor when measured by one component of fitness (e.g., seedling growth), but a poor competitor when measured by a different component of fitness (e.g., seedling survival), understanding the relative importance of each component of fitness for persistence in the community is critical to understanding how communities are structured. Using a field and a garden experiment in southeastern Michigan, we generated competitive response hierarchies among 4-8 old-field perennials for five components of fitness (ger- mination, seedling growth, seedling survival, adult growth, and adult survival). We ex- amined how the overall response to neighbors changes among components of fitness, the concordance of hierarchies within and among components of fitness, and the correlations between competitive hierarchies and natural abundance. We found little to no overall effect of neighbors on germination and seedling survival, indicating a high tolerance (= strong response competitive ability) of species for neighbors as measured by these components of fitness. We found a strong effect of neighbors on seedling growth, and on adult survival and growth, indicating poorer response competitive ability overall for these components. Although rankings of competitive ability were concordant among species across all com- ponents of fitness, certain demographic parameters were more consistent in their rankings than others. Specifically, competitive response hierarchies based on size were strongly concordant, while those based on survival were not. This suggests that future studies may effectively estimate response competitive ability for growth with a single estimate, but that estimates of response competitive ability for survival at both the seedling and adult stages may be required. Finally, competitive response rankings based on germination and seedling growth were most strongly correlated with abundance, suggesting that these components of fitness more strongly influence success in the community than do seedling survival and adult growth and survival.

[1]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  13 – Competitive Hierarchies and Centrifugal Organization in Plant Communities , 1990 .

[2]  Janis Antonovics,et al.  Analysis of frequency and density effects on growth in mixtures of Salvia splendens and Linum grandiflorum using hexagonal fan designs. , 1985 .

[3]  L. Aarssen,et al.  Effect of nutrient level on competition intensity in the field for three coexisting grass species , 1991 .

[4]  G. Aplet,et al.  Relative performance of four Hawaiian shrubby plants (asteraceae) under greenhouse conditions with implications for rarity , 1993 .

[5]  Scott D. Wilson,et al.  Competitive responses of eight old-field plant species in four environments , 1995 .

[6]  J. Gurevitch.  Competition and the Local Distribution of the Grass Stipa Neomexicana , 1986 .

[7]  S. Wilson,et al.  Competition, Fire, and Nutients in a Mixed-Grass Prairie , 1990 .

[8]  Arthur Cronquist,et al.  Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada , 2004 .

[9]  J. Grace.  Juveniles vs. Adult Competitive Abilities in Plants: Size‐dependence in Cattails (Typha) , 1985 .

[10]  Andrew R. Watkinson,et al.  Density-dependence in single-species populations of plants , 1980 .

[11]  D. Steven.  EXPERIMENTS ON MECHANISMS OF TREE ESTABLISHMENT IN OLD-FIELD SUCCESSION: SEEDLING EMERGENCE' , 1991 .

[12]  D. Goldberg.  Seedling Colonization of Experimental Gaps in Two Old-Field Communities , 1987 .

[13]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Competitive Interactions in Plant Communities of Different Successional Ages , 1982 .

[14]  D. Goldberg.  Influence of Competition at the Community Level: An Experimental Version of the Null Models Approach , 1994 .

[15]  R. Reader.  Control of seedling emergence by ground cover and seed predation in relation to seed size for some old-field species , 1993 .

[16]  James B. Grace,et al.  On the Measurement of Plant Competition Intensity , 1995 .

[17]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Competition and relative yield: estimation and interpretation at different densities and under various nutrient concentrations using Silybum marianum and Cirsium vulgare , 1988 .

[18]  Deborah E. Goldberg,et al.  NEIGHBORHOOD COMPETITION IN AN OLD-FIELD PLANT COMMUNITY' , 1987 .

[19]  Scott D. Wilson,et al.  The Influence of Initial Size on the Competitive Responses of Six Plant Species , 1995 .

[20]  J. Gurevitch,et al.  Competition among old-field perennials at different levels of soil fertility and available space , 1990 .

[21]  P. Dixon,et al.  Competitive Abilities of Sparse Grass Species: Means of Persistence or Cause of Abundance , 1984 .

[22]  C. Welden,et al.  The Intensity of Competition Versus its Importance: An Overlooked Distinction and Some Implications , 1986, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[23]  D. Steven.  Experiments on Mechanisms of Tree Establishment in Old-Field Succession: Seedling Survival and Growth , 1991 .

[24]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  EMPIRICAL APPROACHES TO QUANTIFYING INTERACTION INTENSITY: COMPETITION AND FACILITATION ALONG PRODUCTIVITY GRADIENTS , 1999 .

[25]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  A Neighborhood Model of Annual‐Plant Interference , 1982 .

[26]  S. Wilson.  Initial size and the competitive responses of two grasses at two levels of soil nitrogen: a field experiment , 1994 .

[27]  C. Collet,et al.  Effect of two forest grasses differing in their growth dynamics on the water relations and the growth of Quercus petraea seedlings , 1996 .

[28]  P. Grubb.  THE MAINTENANCE OF SPECIES‐RICHNESS IN PLANT COMMUNITIES: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE REGENERATION NICHE , 1977 .

[29]  L. Walker,et al.  Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities , 1997 .

[30]  Charles D. Canham,et al.  Growth and Canopy Architecture of Shade‐Tolerant Trees: Response to Canopy Gaps , 1988 .

[31]  P. Werner.  COLONIZATION SUCCESS OF A "BIENNIAL" PLANT SPECIES: EXPERIMENTAL FIELD STUDIES OF SPECIES COHABITATION AND REPLACEMENT' , 1977 .

[32]  T. Miller,et al.  Competitive Effects and Responses Between Plant Species in a First‐Year Old‐Field Community , 1987 .

[33]  W. Kunin.  Sex and the single mustard : population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed-set , 1993 .

[34]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Coexistence Mediated by Recruitment Fluctuations: A Field Guide to the Storage Effect , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[35]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[36]  P. Grubb,et al.  CONTROL OF RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF PERENNIALS IN CHALK GRASSLAND IN SOUTHERN ENGLAND I. CONSTANCY OF RANK ORDER AND RESULTS OF POT- AND FIELD-EXPERIMENTS ON THE ROLE OF INTERFERENCE , 1986 .

[37]  J. Grace,et al.  Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients: the elements of a predictive theory of competition. , 1990 .

[38]  Charles D. Canham,et al.  Competition vs. Facilitation of Tree Seedling Growth and Survival in Early Successional Communities , 1995 .

[39]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[40]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Equivalence of competitors in plant communities: a null hypothesis and a field experimental approach. , 1983 .

[41]  V. T. Parker,et al.  Vegetational and Environmental Changes beneath Isolated Live Oak Trees (Quercus agrifolia) in a California Annual Grassland , 1982 .

[42]  D. Tilman,et al.  Component of Plant Competition Along an Experimental Gradient of Nitrogen Availability , 1991 .

[43]  P. Keddy,et al.  Competitive Effect and Response Rankings in 20 Wetland Plants: Are They Consistent Across Three Environments? , 1994 .

[44]  Timothy G. Howard.  The relationship of total and per‐gram rankings in competitive effect to the natural abundance of herbaceous perennials , 2001 .

[45]  Variation in the effects of vegetation and litter on recruitment across productivity gradients , 1999 .

[46]  P. Keddy,et al.  Mechanisms producing plant zonation along a water depth gradient: a comparison with the exposure gradient , 1991 .