Cellular Statistical Models of Broken Cloud Fields. Part II: Comparison with a Dynamical Model and Statistics of Diverse Ensembles

Cellular statistical models are designed to provide a simple two-parameter characterization of the structure of broken cloud fields described through distributions of cloud fraction and of chord lengths for clouds and clear gaps. In these analytical models cloud fields are assumed to occur on a semiregular grid of cells (which can be vaguely interpreted as atmospheric convective cells). In a simple, discrete cell model, cell size is fixed and each cell can either be completely filled with cloud with some probability or remain empty. Extending the discrete model to a continuous case provides more realism by allowing arbitrary cloud and gap sizes. Here the continuous cellular model is tested by comparing its statistics with those from large-eddy simulations (LES) of marine boundary layer clouds based on case studies from three trade-cumulus field projects. The statistics largely agree with some differences in small sizes approaching the LES model grid spacing. Exponential chord-length distributions follow from the assumption that the probability of any cell being cloudy is constant, appropriate for a given meteorological state (narrow sampling). Relaxing that assumption, and instead allowing this probability to have its own distribution, leads to a power-law distribution of chord lengths, appropriate to a broader sample of meteorological states (diverse sampling).

[1]  Evgueni I. Kassianov,et al.  Temporal Variability of Fair-Weather Cumulus Statistics at the ACRF SGP Site , 2008 .

[2]  Manfred Wendisch,et al.  Reproducing cloud microphysical and irradiance measurements using three 3D cloud generators , 2007 .

[3]  3D Radiative Transfer in Stochastic Media , 2005 .

[4]  Robert F. Cahalan Bounded cascade clouds: albedo and effective thickness , 1994 .

[5]  Sarah F. Kew,et al.  A 3D stochastic cloud model for investigating the radiative properties of inhomogeneous cirrus clouds , 2005 .

[6]  Richard C. J. Somerville,et al.  Radiative Transfer through Broken Clouds: Observations and Model Validation , 2002 .

[7]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  A three-dimensional atmospheric radiative transfer model based on the discrete-ordinates method , 1994 .

[8]  R. A. Groeneveld,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics (2nd ed). , 1981 .

[9]  H. Riehl,et al.  Mass and Energy Transports in an Undisturbed Atlantic Trade-Wind Flow , 1973 .

[10]  M. F. Fuller,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics; Nonparametric Statistical Inference , 1973 .

[11]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  Fractal Statistics of Cloud Fields , 1989 .

[12]  D. Schertzer,et al.  Physical modeling and analysis of rain and clouds by anisotropic scaling multiplicative processes , 1987 .

[13]  I. S. Gradshteyn,et al.  Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 1976 .

[14]  Larry Di Girolamo,et al.  A general formalism for the distribution of the total length of a geophysical parameter along a finite transect , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[15]  P. A. Jones Cloud-cover distributions and correlations , 1992 .

[16]  Vernon G. Plank,et al.  The Size Distribution of Cumulus Clouds in Representative Florida Populations , 1969 .

[17]  Mikhail D. Alexandrov,et al.  Cellular Statistical Models of Broken Cloud Fields. Part I: Theory , 2010 .

[18]  L. Remer,et al.  How small is a small cloud , 2008 .

[19]  Radiative Transfer in Cloud Fields with Random Geometry , 1995 .

[20]  G. C. Pomraning,et al.  A Stochastic Description of a Broken Cloud Field , 1994 .

[21]  S. Esbensen,et al.  Heat and Moisture Budget Analyses Using BOMEX Data , 1974 .

[22]  M. Abrams The Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER): Data products for the high spatial resolution imager on NASA's Terra platform , 2000 .

[23]  M. Isichenko Percolation, statistical topography, and transport in random media , 1992 .

[24]  Ronald M. Welch,et al.  Cumulus Cloud Properties Derived Using Landsat Satellite Data , 1986 .

[25]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  A Large Eddy Simulation Intercomparison Study of Shallow Cumulus Convection , 2003 .

[26]  A. Marshak,et al.  A Simple Stochastic Model for Generating Broken Cloud Optical Depth and Cloud-Top Height Fields , 2009 .

[27]  A. P Prudnikov,et al.  Direct Laplace transforms , 1992 .

[28]  S. Nicholls The structure of radiatively driven convection in stratocumulus , 1989 .

[29]  Guangyu Zhao,et al.  Statistics on the macrophysical properties of trade wind cumuli over the tropical western Atlantic , 2007 .

[30]  K.,et al.  Simulations of Trade Wind Cumuli under a Strong Inversion , 2001 .

[31]  C. Simmer,et al.  Statistical characteristics of surrogate data based on geophysical measurements , 2006 .

[32]  I. Astin,et al.  A Case for Exponential Cloud Fields , 1998 .

[33]  L. W. Falls,et al.  The beta distribution - A statistical model for world cloud cover , 1974 .

[34]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  Rain in Shallow Cumulus Over the Ocean: The RICO Campaign , 2007 .

[35]  Harm J. J. Jonker,et al.  Size Distributions and Dynamical Properties of Shallow Cumulus Clouds from Aircraft Observations and Satellite Data , 2003 .

[36]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  Nearest Neighbor Spacing of Fair Weather Cumulus Clouds. , 1990 .

[37]  Marshak,et al.  Bounded cascade models as nonstationary multifractals. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[38]  K. Nagel,et al.  Self-organizing criticality in cloud formation? , 1992 .

[39]  Guangyu Zhao,et al.  Scale effect on statistics of the macrophysical properties of trade wind cumuli over the tropical western Atlantic during RICO , 2008 .

[40]  Warren J. Wiscombe,et al.  An algorithm for generating stochastic cloud fields from radar profile statistics , 2004 .

[41]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing , 2004, Nature.