Convolution kernels are essential tools in signal processing: they are used to filter noisy signal, interpolate discrete signals, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\ldots $$\end{document}. However, in a given application, it is often hard to select an optimal shape of the kernel. This is why, in practice, it may be useful to possess efficient tools to perform a robustness analysis, talking the form in our case of an imprecise convolution. When convolution kernels are positive, their formal equivalence with probability distributions allows one to use imprecise probability theory to achieve such an imprecise convolution. However, many kernels can have negative values, in which case the previous equivalence does not hold anymore. Yet, we show mathematically in this paper that, while the formal equivalence is lost, the computational tools used to describe sets of probabilities by intervals on the singletons still retain their key properties when used to approximate sets of (possibly) non-positive kernels. We then illustrate their use on a single application that consists of filtering a human electrocardiogram signal by using a low-pass filter whose order is imprecisely known. We show, in this experiment, that the proposed approach leads to tighter bounds than previously proposed approaches.
[1]
P. Wakker,et al.
Nonmonotonic Choquet Integrals
,
2001
.
[2]
Sébastien Destercke,et al.
F-boxes for filtering
,
2011,
EUSFLAT Conf..
[3]
Sébastien Destercke,et al.
Filtering with clouds
,
2012,
Soft Comput..
[4]
Olivier Strauss,et al.
Where the domination of maxitive kernels is extended to signed values
,
2019,
2019 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE).
[5]
Luis M. de Campos,et al.
Probability Intervals: a Tool for uncertain Reasoning
,
1994,
Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..
[6]
DesterckeS.,et al.
Unifying practical uncertainty representations -- I
,
2008
.
[7]
Didier Dubois,et al.
Unifying practical uncertainty representations - I: Generalized p-boxes
,
2008,
Int. J. Approx. Reason..
[8]
F. Porée,et al.
Stability analysis of the 12-lead ECG morphology in different physiological conditions of interest for biometric applications
,
2009,
2009 36th Annual Computers in Cardiology Conference (CinC).
[9]
Kevin Loquin,et al.
On the granularity of summative kernels
,
2008,
Fuzzy Sets Syst..
[10]
Sébastien Destercke,et al.
Density Estimation with Imprecise Kernels: Application to Classification
,
2018,
SMPS.
[11]
Jiří Jan,et al.
Digital signal filtering, analysis and restoration
,
2000
.